On 2010.03.16 21:06, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> On 2010.03.16 17:01, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03/16/2010 07:38 AM, Rick Ernst wrote:
>>> Regurgitating the original e-mail for context and follow-up.
>>>
>>> General responses (some that didn't make it to the list):
>>> - "There really is that m
On 2010.03.16 17:01, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>
>
> On 03/16/2010 07:38 AM, Rick Ernst wrote:
>> Regurgitating the original e-mail for context and follow-up.
>>
>> General responses (some that didn't make it to the list):
>> - "There really is that much space, don't worry about it."
>> - /48s for
On 03/16/2010 07:38 AM, Rick Ernst wrote:
> Regurgitating the original e-mail for context and follow-up.
>
> General responses (some that didn't make it to the list):
> - "There really is that much space, don't worry about it."
> - /48s for those that ask for it is fine, ARIN won't ask unles
On Mar 16, 2010, at 7:38 AM, Rick Ernst wrote:
> Regurgitating the original e-mail for context and follow-up.
>
> General responses (some that didn't make it to the list):
> - "There really is that much space, don't worry about it."
> - /48s for those that ask for it is fine, ARIN won't ask un
Rick Ernst wrote:
[..]
> I haven't seen anything on the general feel for prefix filtering. I've seen
> discussions from /48 down to /54. Any feel for what the "standard" (widely
> deployed) IPv6 prefix filter size will be?
There have been a lot of discussions on this before.
(See also http://lis
Regurgitating the original e-mail for context and follow-up.
General responses (some that didn't make it to the list):
- "There really is that much space, don't worry about it."
- /48s for those that ask for it is fine, ARIN won't ask unless it's a
bigger assignment
- /52 (or /56) on smaller
On Mar 13, 2010, at 9:49 PM, Rick Ernst wrote:
A couple of different incantations searching the archive didn't
enlighten
me, and I find it hard to believe this hasn't been discussed.
Apologies and
a request for pointers if I'm rehashing an old question.
Don't have the pointers handy, but
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Rick Ernst wrote:
A /48 seems to be the standard end-user/multi-homed customer allocation and
is the minimum allocation size from ARIN. A /32 provides 65K /48s so, in
theory, we could give each of our customers a /48 and still have room for
growth. A /48 also appears to be
A couple of different incantations searching the archive didn't enlighten
me, and I find it hard to believe this hasn't been discussed. Apologies and
a request for pointers if I'm rehashing an old question.
As a small/regional ISP, we got our /32 assigned and it's time to start
moving forward (cu
9 matches
Mail list logo
