Re: Request for Deployment of Google/YouTube Global Cache Servers in Türkiye (Istanbul, Izmir and Ankara of TURKEI)

This mailing list is not the appropriate avenue for such requests. No idea why you would think it was. Google lays out their process here : https://support.google.com/interconnect/answer/9058809?hl=en On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 6:33 PM Volkan SALiH wrote: > *Subject:* Request for Deployment

Request for Deployment of Google/YouTube Global Cache Servers in Türkiye (Istanbul, Izmir and Ankara of TURKEI)

*Subject:* Request for Deployment of Google/YouTube Global Cache Servers in Türkiye *To Whom It May Concern,* I am a government officer and a colleague of Mr. Ahmet Hamdi Atalay (ahata...@turksat.com.tr), who serves at Türksat. Currently, internet users in Türkiye experience *Google/YouTube

** Keynote: Q&A With Google Cloud’s Freund on ‘AI-Powered Network 5.0’ + More!

*** Keynote: Q&A With Google Cloud’s Freund on ‘AI-Powered Network 5.0’* *Yun Freund will Present “AI-Powered Network 5.0 – A Paradigm Shift” and Usher in “A New Era of Possibilities”* NANOG caught up with Freund to explore how A

Re: Google Geo IP contact

You can make an account on https://isp.google.com and submit your geofeed there once they create your account. Takes a couple of days for your application to get processed. Best Phin 2025年1月13日(月) 23:37 Lou Devictoria : > Hi Nanog > > Is there anyone from Google who can help me correct

Google Geo IP contact

Hi Nanog Is there anyone from Google who can help me correcting GeoIP information for my sites . Please contact me

Re: google imap timeouts / slowness from Toronto Canada ?

Hoi, On 22.05.2024 19:37, mike tancsa wrote: Anyone else seeing google imap timeouts / slowness ? Cannot confirm - pim@squanchy:~$ echo QUIT | time openssl s_client -host imap.gmail.com -port 993     0.14 real 0.05 user 0.06 sys pim@squanchy:~$ echo QUIT | time openssl

google imap timeouts / slowness from Toronto Canada ?

Anyone else seeing google imap timeouts / slowness ?  We hit their services in Toronto Canada for ipv6 and ipv4 via gtt (However, ipv4 seems to come back via Torix). I am not seeing packet loss, just a lot of slowness in response at the app layer. google status says all ok.  Problems started

Re: Stalled IX requests in Google peering

Will You can send me the ticket number(s) by email. Also, if anyone else has (have) similar issues feel free to email me. Regards as On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 15:17, Will OBrien via NANOG wrote: > Since google is abandoning RS routes, we worked on setting up IX peering > across the

Re: Stalled IX requests in Google peering

In my experience I have a ticket unanswered for half a year. Not a great experience. Best Regards, Dominik Dobrowolski W dniu pon., 4.03.2024 o 16:15 Will OBrien via NANOG napisał(a): > Since google is abandoning RS routes, we worked on setting up IX peering > across the board. >

Stalled IX requests in Google peering

Since google is abandoning RS routes, we worked on setting up IX peering across the board. All of those requests have been completed but one seems to be stalled out for a couple of weeks now. I put in a noc ticket and got a tone deaf response of ‘that’s another group and the ticket is still

Re: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

On 05/12/2023 20:08, Christopher Morrow wrote: is the test framework documented where others could setup/run the test(s)? :) (perhaps for mr hare I mean, or me! :) ) https://github.com/isc-projects/perflab https://www.isc.org/docs/bellis-oarc-perflab.pdf Are the tests for authoritative o

Re: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 10:17 AM Ray Bellis wrote: > > > > On 05/12/2023 12:29, Michael Hare via NANOG wrote: > > > At quick glance following the ISC link I didn’t see the compute > > infrastructure [core count] needed to get 1Mpps. There is an obvious > > difference between 99% load of ~500rps an

Re: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

On 05/12/2023 12:29, Michael Hare via NANOG wrote: At quick glance following the ISC link I didn’t see the compute infrastructure [core count] needed to get 1Mpps.  There is an obvious difference between 99% load of ~500rps and 1M, so we can maybe advise to not undersize ADNS if that's an i

RE: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

Damian- Not Google or ISCs fault, our customers have made some decisions that have exasperated the issues. By and away the biggest problem facing my customers is that they have chosen a stateful border firewall that collapses due to session exhaustion and they put everything, including aDNS

Re: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

On Mon, 4 Dec 2023, Damian Menscher wrote: have more redundancy/capacity). Based on these estimates, we haven't treated mitigation of small attacks as a high priority. If O(25Kpps) attacks are causing real problems for the community, I'd appreciate that feedback and some hints as to why your ex

Re: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

Google Public DNS (8.8.8.8) attempts to identify and filter abuse, and while we think we're fairly effective for large attacks (eg, those above 1Mpps), it gets more challenging (due to risk of false positives) to adequately filter small attacks. I should note that we generally see the a

Re: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

Just set TC=1 for those clients. If you get queries over TCP then they where not spoofed. If they are using DNS COOKIE (RFC 7873) you can send back BADCOOKIE to the initial (client cookie only) UDP request with your server cookie. Identifying real DNS clients has been possible for years now.

Re: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

> On 4 Dec 2023, at 08:21, Michael Hare via NANOG wrote: > > John- > > This is little consolation, but at AS3128, I see the same thing to our > downstream at times, claiming to come from both 13335 and 15169 often > simultaneously at the tune of 25Kpps , "assuming it's not spoofed", which i

RE: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

out. I pine for the internet of the 1990s. Assuming it's really Google and Cloudflare, it is probably not malicious, just very inept mail admins. They assume that abuse.net is some sort of DNSBL so they configure their mail server to query it for every domain in every message they see,

RE: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

Sunday, December 3, 2023 1:18 PM > To: Peter Potvin > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server? > > > Did a bit of digging on Google's developer site and came across this: > > https://developers.google.com/speed/publ

Re: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

their site. They could also be spoofed though from a DNS AMP attack, so keep that in mind. Per my recent message, the replies are tiny so if it's an amplification attack, it's a very incompetent one. The queries are case randomized so I guess it's really Google. Sigh. If anyo

Re: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

172.253.X.X are Google DNS : https://www.gstatic.com/ipranges/publicdns.json 172.71.X.X are Cloudflare : https://www.cloudflare.com/ips-v4/# On Sun, Dec 3, 2023 at 1:49 PM John Levine wrote: > At contacts.abuse.net, I have a little stunt DNS server that provides > domain contact inf

Re: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

es, no addditional section, no DNSSSEC, no nothing. Any other ideas? One clue is that the queries have random capitalization which would be consistent with them really coming from Google. Every once in a while someone decides to look up every domain in the world and DoS'es it until I updat

Re: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

net > comcast.net.contacts.abuse.net host information "lookup" "comcast.net" > > Every once in a while someone decides to look up every domain in the > world and DoS'es it until I update my packet filters. This week it's > been this set of IPs that belong t

Re: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

hinfo comcast.net.contacts.abuse.net > comcast.net.contacts.abuse.net host information "lookup" "comcast.net" > > Every once in a while someone decides to look up every domain in the > world and DoS'es it until I update my packet filters. This week it's > been this set of

Re: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

- Original Message - From: "John Levine" To: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Sunday, December 3, 2023 12:48:11 PM Subject: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server? At contacts.abuse.net, I have a little stunt DNS server that provides domain contact info, e

What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

e.net host information "lookup" "comcast.net" Every once in a while someone decides to look up every domain in the world and DoS'es it until I update my packet filters. This week it's been this set of IPs that belong to Google. I don't think they're 8.8.8.8. Any

Google ISP portal repeatedly denied for peer

Anyone from Google that could help get us isp portal access? We're directly period with Google but continually get denied portal access. Ticket 72617. Thank you in advance, TJ Trout Volt Broadband -- Forwarded message - From: TJ Trout Date: Tue, Oct 17, 2023, 6:

Re: Providing geofeed info to Google

c: if one doesn't have access to https://isp.google.com how > does one update their geo-location data so Google sees it? > > Thanks, > > Hank > > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 12:34:41PM -0700, Hugo Slabbert wrote: > >> Google folks: > >> > >>

Re: Providing geofeed info to Google

Old topic: if one doesn't have access to https://isp.google.com how does one update their geo-location data so Google sees it? Thanks, Hank On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 12:34:41PM -0700, Hugo Slabbert wrote: Google folks: I see historical reference to needing to use the Google Peering P

Re: Google Contact

https://www.peeringdb.com/net/433 Please read the notes in their PeeringDB entry. It lists instructions on how to set that up. Cheers, Mike On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 1:07 PM Pascal Masha wrote: > > Hello Folks, > > Anyone from Google who can assist setup BGP peering through SFMI

Re: Google Contact

llo Folks, >> >> Anyone from Google who can assist setup BGP peering through SFMIX IX, >> kindly contact me off list. >> >> Thanks >> Regards >> >> Paschal Masha >> >

Re: Google Contact

Thank Robert! This is the way. On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:11 PM Robert Story wrote: > On Thu 2023-09-14 19:33:42+0300 Pascal wrote: > > Anyone from Google who can assist setup BGP peering through SFMIX IX, > > kindly contact me off list. > > I have contacts at google, and w

Re: Google Contact

Having trouble using the route servers? On Thu, Sep 14, 2023, 9:37 AM Pascal Masha wrote: > Hello Folks, > > Anyone from Google who can assist setup BGP peering through SFMIX IX, > kindly contact me off list. > > Thanks > Regards > > Paschal Masha >

Google Contact

Hello Folks, Anyone from Google who can assist setup BGP peering through SFMIX IX, kindly contact me off list. Thanks Regards Paschal Masha

Google peering assistance

Hello If someone from Google peering is on, would you kindly contact me? Thanks Jason

Anyone from Google Global Cache ?

Hello, Is there someone on this list from the Google Global Cache program (GGC) who could contact me off-list? If so I would greatly appreciate that. I would need a favor to get some information and look up a case because the responses to the tickets in the ISP portal I am getting are not giving

Re: Google Speed Test

I maintain a fleet of 15 "flent" servers across the globe, leveraging irtt, iperf, netperf, and a few other tools. I do not have the resources to publish them widely (flent.org's tools are by design, intended more for folk to quickly spin up a server and client for internal tests, because most of t

Re: Google Speed Test

Cloudflare has https://speed.cloudflare.com and Apple has http://test.edge.apple/debug/ too. The Cloudflare speed test usually gives lesser results vs. Ookla while Apple's test URL is only useful to test on which cluster an end-customer ends up. I'll take notes about the "networkQuality" command!

Re: Google Speed Test

> On Jan 3, 2023, at 08:24, Mike Hammett wrote: > > I think this is why Netflix came out with fast.com , but > AFAIK, they're the only ones that have their own tool using their own > infrastructure. macOS have a built-in “networkQuality” command line tool (`man networkQuali

Re: Google Speed Test

idwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Tom Beecher" To: "Mike Hammett" Cc: "Jared Mauch" , "NANOG" Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2023 10:17:24 AM Subject: Re: Google Speed Test Totally see your perspective. I'

Re: Google Speed Test

st-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > -- > *From: *"Jared Mau

Re: Google Speed Test

while your service could deliver Y megabit. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Jared Mauch" To: "Mike Hammett" Cc: "Tom Beecher" , "NANOG" Sent: Tuesday, Jan

Re: Google Speed Test

Ok. But to the layperson, that is still not a meaningful test of Google's capacity. Say I'm a 'layperson' residential customer of an ISP with 1G service. I run this speedtest, and I only get 500M to Google. 1. That may still be plenty of capacity for what the user WANTS

Re: Google Speed Test

On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:31:27AM -0600, Mike Hammett wrote: > Is there enough available capacity for {insert whatever the customer is > trying to do here}. > > Can they run 4 YouTubeTV streams or can they run 20? > Can they download a file at 5 megabits/s or 15 gigabits/s? > > > There's no

Re: Google Speed Test

to be gleaned for a variety of purposes. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Tom Beecher" To: "Mike Hammett" Cc: "NANOG" Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2023 9:07:57

Re: Google Speed Test

fxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > -- > *From: *"Tom Beecher" > *To: *"Mike Hammett" > *Cc: *"NANOG" > *Sent: *Tuesday, January 3, 2023 8:50:35 AM > *Subject: *Re: Google Speed Test > > Does AS15169 have a speed test? It wou

Re: Google Speed Test

ary 3, 2023 8:50:35 AM Subject: Re: Google Speed Test Does AS15169 have a speed test? It would be nice to gauge the capacity to a particular network that's something laypeople could do. 15169 has enough capacity to external networks that a speed test from a random 'laypers

Re: Google Speed Test

> > Does AS15169 have a speed test? It would be nice to gauge the capacity to > a particular network that's something laypeople could do. > 15169 has enough capacity to external networks that a speed test from a random 'layperson' is never going to give you any meaningful information. On Wed, Dec

Re: Google Speed Test

ostic tool for network issues, not a speed test tool. There are many academic papers on this point. On 12/28/22, 16:06, "NANOG on behalf of Mike Hammett" mailto:cable.comcast@nanog.org> on behalf of na...@ics-il.net <mailto:na...@ics-il.net>> wrote: Searching

Re: Google Speed Test

same here Josh. . . *Glenn S. Kelley, *I am a Connectivity.Engineer Text and Voice Direct: 740-206-9624 a Division of CreatingNet.Works IMPORTANT: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential. They are intended for the named recipient(s) only. I

Re: Google Speed Test

All of those links time out for me (at speedtest.cloud). On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 11:06 AM Adam Blackington wrote: > https://www.speedtest.cloud > are also GCP endpoints. > > Adam > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 4:55 PM Dave Taht wrote: > >> Waveform leverages cloud flare's CDN. >> >> I have a world

Re: Google Speed Test

https://www.speedtest.cloud are also GCP endpoints. Adam On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 4:55 PM Dave Taht wrote: > Waveform leverages cloud flare's CDN. > > I have a worldwide fleet of iperf, netperf, flent and irtt servers folk > are welcome to use, as I don't trust the web best tests > > On Wed,

Re: Google Speed Test

Waveform leverages cloud flare's CDN. I have a worldwide fleet of iperf, netperf, flent and irtt servers folk are welcome to use, as I don't trust the web best tests On Wed, Dec 28, 2022, 11:44 AM Douglas Fischer wrote: > I have recollection of something like embeded quality testing on yout

Re: Google Speed Test

; , "North American Network Operators' Group" Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2022 12:02:52 PM Subject: Re: Google Speed Test None of them are accurate. The one from a Google search gave me around 280Mbps, the stadia gave me 39Mbps, and Ookla gave me close to 500Mbps.. On We

Re: Google Speed Test

Searching Google for speed test presents a speedtest that runs on MLab, which doesn't necessarily run on Google's network. https://www.measurementlab.net/status/ - Mike Hammett [ http://www.ics-il.com/ | Intelligent Computing Solutions ] [ https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL

Re: Google Speed Test

They axed all that years ago, it was here: https://www.google.com/get/videoqualityreport On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 2:43 PM Douglas Fischer wrote: > I have recollection of something like embeded quality testing on youtube. > I don't remember if it was a speed test or a latency/jitter test. > > I lo

Re: Google Speed Test

I have recollection of something like embeded quality testing on youtube. I don't remember if it was a speed test or a latency/jitter test. I looked quickly to see if I could find it... But I couldn't find it. Em qua., 28 de dez. de 2022 às 13:43, Mike Hammett escreveu: > Does AS15169 have a sp

Re: Google Speed Test

Those are all M-Lab tests - Stadia and google search results. They're not always certainly through Google's network (I would have to imagine they're typically not). On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 1:17 PM Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Robert Webb said: > > None of th

Re: Google Speed Test

Once upon a time, Robert Webb said: > None of them are accurate. The one from a Google search gave me around > 280Mbps, the stadia gave me 39Mbps, and Ookla gave me close to 500Mbps.. Browser-based speed testing is a crapshoot for anything above about 100M... Ookla has a native client fo

Re: Google Speed Test

None of them are accurate. The one from a Google search gave me around 280Mbps, the stadia gave me 39Mbps, and Ookla gave me close to 500Mbps.. On Wed, Dec 28, 2022, 12:51 Lukas Tribus wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, 28 Dec 2022 at 17:41, Mike Hammett wrote: > > > > Does

Re: Google Speed Test

On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 12:50 PM Lukas Tribus wrote: > > Hello, > > On Wed, 28 Dec 2022 at 17:41, Mike Hammett wrote: > > > > Does AS15169 have a speed test? > > Stadia speedtest is still up today: > > https://stadia.google.com/speedtest "Google partners

Re: Google Speed Test

Hello, On Wed, 28 Dec 2022 at 17:41, Mike Hammett wrote: > > Does AS15169 have a speed test? Stadia speedtest is still up today: https://stadia.google.com/speedtest Lukas

Re: Google Speed Test

Search "speed test" and Google search had one built in On Wed, 28 Dec 2022, 16:43 Mike Hammett, wrote: > Does AS15169 have a speed test? It would be nice to gauge the capacity to > a particular network that's something laypeople could do. I could host > something in

Google Speed Test

Does AS15169 have a speed test? It would be nice to gauge the capacity to a particular network that's something laypeople could do. I could host something in GCP myself, but cloud is expensive. - Mike Hammett [ http://www.ics-il.com/ | Intelligent Computing Solutions ] [ https://www.faceb

Re: Providing geofeed info to Google

Good call, thanks. That appears to be via the assigned resources bit ("IP Addresses" heading in Arin Online). Will give that a shot, thanks! -- Hugo Slabbert On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 1:38 PM Job Snijders wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 01:28:18PM -0700, Hugo Slabbert wrote: > > @Job: > > > >

Re: Providing geofeed info to Google

On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 01:28:18PM -0700, Hugo Slabbert wrote: > @Job: > > Thanks! I was aware of the RIPE whois option, but the relevant resources > for us are in ARIN. I wasn't aware of the RPSL *remark* option for > providing that. We should be able to give that a bash. Hmmm, there might be

Re: Providing geofeed info to Google

@Job: Thanks! I was aware of the RIPE whois option, but the relevant resources for us are in ARIN. I wasn't aware of the RPSL *remark* option for providing that. We should be able to give that a bash. Can anyone confirm if Google respects the remark-based option? Given the authors and s

Re: Providing geofeed info to Google

Dear Hugo, On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 12:34:41PM -0700, Hugo Slabbert wrote: > Google folks: > > I see historical reference to needing to use the Google Peering Portal ( > http://peering.google.com) if you need to provide Google with geofeed info > for GeoIP info on network bloc

Re: Providing geofeed info to Google

<http://isp.google.com>) which does have Geofeed processing for my AS, but I am unsure if you will get access without being an eyeball network. On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 3:37 PM Hugo Slabbert wrote: Google folks: I see historical reference to needing to use the Google Peering P

Re: Providing geofeed info to Google

I was able to get access without peering with 15169 by getting access to the ISP portal (isp.google.com) which does have Geofeed processing for my AS, but I am unsure if you will get access without being an eyeball network. On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 3:37 PM Hugo Slabbert wrote: > Google fo

Providing geofeed info to Google

Google folks: I see historical reference to needing to use the Google Peering Portal ( http://peering.google.com) if you need to provide Google with geofeed info for GeoIP info on network blocks, ref https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2015-May/075229.html. Is that still the case? Are

Re: [External] Re: Google Abuse

Someone in this discussion has a good mindset for security. Everyone in it has responsibilities towards protecting users from harm. Thank you. Jason Jason Kinney Ethical Technologist Surrey, BC, Canada jkinne...@yahoo.ca On Wednesday, August 17, 2022, 09:22:33 a.m. PDT, Tom Beecher wro

Re: [External] Re: Google Abuse

> > some might conclude that "T-Mobile filters links to right-leaning news > outlets. > That conclusion, based on the methodology described, would be wrong, and that should be called out. On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 12:09 PM Hunter Fuller wrote: > Sure, that's why I said that in my third paragrap

Re: [External] Re: Google Abuse

Sure, that's why I said that in my third paragraph. But once we know that they do, in fact, filter messages, we can understand why it might *seem* like they filter based on political content. For example, if a left-leaning news outlet uses bit.ly URLs, and a right-leaning one uses goo.gl URLs, and

Re: [External] Re: Google Abuse

Spam filtering is clearly not the accusation that was laid out. On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 11:48 AM Hunter Fuller wrote: > I wouldn't call it a serious claim. By their own admission T-Mobile > filters messages based on content. > > > https://community.t-mobile.com/accounts-services-4/can-t-send-rec

Re: [External] Re: Google Abuse

I wouldn't call it a serious claim. By their own admission T-Mobile filters messages based on content. https://community.t-mobile.com/accounts-services-4/can-t-send-receive-texts-that-contain-goo-gl-7776 Now, there is no indication I'm aware of, that it is political in nature. But they do, factua

Re: Google Abuse

It's a pretty serious claim to say that cell providers were selectively not delivering messages based on content. Unless you have some more concrete evidence beyond "I sent a few texts" , this list is no place for such things, nor the insinuation of political agendas. On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:5

Re: Google Abuse

They may tell you they are not but there is no doubt in my mind they are and if they got caught their response would be “Oopsie, my bad”. -richey During Covid hysteria cellular carriers were definitly scrubbing text messages that contained things against whatever the agenda was. There was no

Re: Google Abuse

m going to make another go at it > within my own. > > And anything we can do to make it harder for networks and cloud providers > to ignore abuse reports and stop it is an Innovation that might move the > burden of network attacks off of the recipients and onto the sources. > > B

Re: Google Abuse

en of network attacks off of the recipients and onto the sources. Beckman On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, richey goldberg wrote: “thought that google fi was a neutral pipe.” There is nothing neutral about Google or any of companies that are their competitors.They all have some sort of agenda which is

Re: Google Abuse

“thought that google fi was a neutral pipe.” There is nothing neutral about Google or any of companies that are their competitors.They all have some sort of agenda which is to do what’s best for them or what they *think* is best for everyone else. Even if it’s not. “are google, like fb

Re: Google Abuse

well, that isn’t exactly true. ALL of the fraudsters, business email compromisers, spoofing accounts are now from gmail and as far as i can tell, there is no evidence that they do ANYTHING about them.i recently gave a talk on fraudulent restaurant reviews in google maps. easy for humans

Re: Google Abuse

On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Cristian Cardoso wrote: Hi I'm receiving thousands of requests from a Google Clou VM on my network, I've already sent reports to Abuse from GCP, but without success, does anyone happen to have a Google abuse contact to indicate? There is no Google abuse.

Re: Google Abuse

Google is pretty unresponsive when it comes to this stuff.I wasted a lot of time trying to report attacks against our networks that turned out to be a futile exercise.It’s an issue that’s all too common to the large providers. Microsoft, Digital Ocean, Amazon, etc, all of them make

Google Abuse

Hi I'm receiving thousands of requests from a Google Clou VM on my network, I've already sent reports to Abuse from GCP, but without success, does anyone happen to have a Google abuse contact to indicate?

Re: [External] Peering with Google and Microsoft

Hi Tom and Oskar, Thanks for surfacing this. We are indeed continuing to pause IX peering as we work to implement IRR filtering on our peering to increase the reliability of Google. This is a very active area of development and a high priority for Google. As we understand that this has been the

RE: [External] Peering with Google and Microsoft

Hi Oskar, I’m in the exact same boat as you. To help clarify for the list. When following the process for Google outlined at https://peering.google.com/#/options/peering we only receive a message stating: “Thank you for requesting Internet Exchange (IX) peering with Google. IX Peering

Re: Peering with Google and Microsoft

: +46 406 68 80 96 Vi bygger broar mellan internet och människor On 2022-08-10 13:49, Marco Paesani wrote: Hi Oskar, for Google https://peering.google.com/#/options/peering Regards, - Marco Paesani Skype: mpaesani Mobile: +39 348 6019349 Success depends on the right choice ! Emai

Re: Peering with Google and Microsoft

Hi Oskar, for Google https://peering.google.com/#/options/peering Regards, - Marco Paesani Skype: mpaesani Mobile: +39 348 6019349 Success depends on the right choice ! Email: ma...@paesani.it Il giorno mer 10 ago 2022 alle ore 13:47 Siyuan Miao ha scritto: > For Microsoft Peer

Re: Peering with Google and Microsoft

For Microsoft Peering you might need to create an Azure account. You can find the how-to document below: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/internet-peering/howto-exchange-portal On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 1:39 PM Oskar Borgqvist wrote: > Hi Nanog > > We have tried to get peering wi

Peering with Google and Microsoft

Hi Nanog We have tried to get peering with Google but only get answers that they are making their peering system better. I have received this answer for over 1 year. The reason why we needed peering to Google is that they do not send out exact prefixes over IXP RS, which means that our traffic

Google Ads

Hello, If you have experience fixing banned google ads accounts please email me off-list. Thanks in advance.

Re: Cogent & Google reachability stable?

Are we discussing direct connectivity between 15169/174? or via a third party(ies)? I ask, because i looks like RouteViews has, in: http://archive.routeviews.org/bgpdata/2020.07/UPDATES/updates.20200715.0345.bz2 at last this bit of clues: BGP4MP_ET|1594784883.404691|A|91.218.184.60|49788|35.213.0

Re: Cogent & Google reachability stable?

On 6/8/22 15:41, David Hubbard wrote: Appears HE (ASN6939) is still unreachable though…  I feel like less entities are single homed to HE, but it would still be a calculated risk. HE is the 800-pound gorilla of IPv6. I would be leery of a carrier without reachability to AS6939. -- Jay Henni

Re: Cogent & Google reachability stable?

I've had zero issues reaching Google via Cogent, however Google didn't pick up transit from Cogent themselves: They got transit from Tata, which makes them reachable via Cogent due to the peering relationship between Cogent and Tata. Regards, Peter On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 6:45 PM Dav

Cogent & Google reachability stable?

It seemed like a decade in the making but has the IPv6 transit between Cogent and Google (via that showed up last fall remained stable? I’d ruled them out on a number of projects for this reason but may reconsider if it has been reliable. Appears HE (ASN6939) is still unreachable though… I

Re: Google Fi IPs

On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 12:55 PM Christopher Morrow wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 12:22 PM John Von Essen wrote: > >> Feel free to contact me off-list if your associated with Google Fi. >> >> I’m trying to narrow down some IP abuse that I believe is coming fr

Re: Google Fi IPs

On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 12:22 PM John Von Essen wrote: > Feel free to contact me off-list if your associated with Google Fi. > > I’m trying to narrow down some IP abuse that I believe is coming from > Google Fi mobile devices. The IPs are all coming up as generic Google LLC > in

Google Fi IPs

Feel free to contact me off-list if your associated with Google Fi. I’m trying to narrow down some IP abuse that I believe is coming from Google Fi mobile devices. The IPs are all coming up as generic Google LLC in whois, and they dont have any reverse DNS. I’m trying to see how I can confirm

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >