Personally, I don't see this as a bad thing. Open disclosure of peering
relationships strikes me as a "sunlight is the best disinfectant" kind of
situation.
Will they be making this information public or accepting it under seal?
If they're making it public, then, I think overall it's a good thing
Hi Fredy,
On 30 Mar 2012, at 22:48, Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
> Now, obviously, the French regulator sees the trouble and trys to understand
> and 'regulate' it the way they do it usually. From our perspective certainly
> not a good way, but why blaming the regulator? Blame those which made it all
>
On Mar 30, 2012, at 23:46, "Fredy Kuenzler" wrote:
> Am 30.03.2012 23:20, schrieb Raphael MAUNIER:
>> Sorry Fredy, but you are living in a care bear world ?
>>
>> Do you think some people build an intense national backbone
>>
>> You were @GPF last week, when Martin asked : Who want this to be
Am 30.03.2012 23:20, schrieb Raphael MAUNIER:
Sorry Fredy, but you are living in a care bear world ?
Do you think some people build an intense national backbone
You were @GPF last week, when Martin asked : Who want this to be
regulated ? And Who want to have his peering controled ? why you didn
-Original Message-
From: Leo Bicknell
Organization: United Federation of Planets
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:37:51 -0700
To: 'NANOG list'
Subject: Re: French Regulator to ask all your information about your
Peering
>In a message written on Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 09:
In a message written on Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 09:20:10PM +, Raphael MAUNIER
wrote:
> You were @GPF last week, when Martin asked : Who want this to be regulated
> ? And Who want to have his peering controled ? why you didn't raise your
> hand ?
>
> In my memory, no one did.
It's also fearmonge
y
incumbent.
--
Raphaël Maunier
NEO TELECOMS
CTO / Directeur Ingénierie
AS8218
-Original Message-
From: Fredy Kuenzler
Organization: Init Seven AG - http://www.init7.net/
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 23:06:39 +0200
To: 'NANOG list'
Subject: Re: French Regulator to ask all your
Am 30.03.2012 20:21, schrieb Raphael MAUNIER:
This is now the end. The French regulator ( Arcep ) is now asking all the
people with an ASN in France ( with a L33 license ) to get all their
information on their peering.
The Arcep claim it's for the "net neutrality" and still don't understand
it w
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 07:50:43PM +0100, Mike
> Blanche wrote:
> > http://www.arcep.fr/index.php?id=9320
> >
> > That's quite a big list. :-( (assuming I understand that list to be
> > everyone licenced under L33-1)
>
>
> From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Fri Mar 30 13:30:19
> 2012
> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 20:29:03 +0200
> From: Stefan Neufeind
> To: "'NANOG list'"
> Subject: Re: French Regulator to ask all your information about your Peering
>
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:05:35PM -0700, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> On Mar 30, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Stefan Neufeind wrote:
> >> You have to give them information twice a year
> > Well, then for a few hundered peerings send them one letter each and
> > wait for a reaction :-)
>
> Remember, these are bu
In a message written on Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 07:50:43PM +0100, Mike Blanche
wrote:
> http://www.arcep.fr/index.php?id=9320
>
> That's quite a big list. :-( (assuming I understand that list to be
> everyone licenced under L33-1)
Can someone with more local knowledge explain a "L33" license?
Looki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mar 30, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Stefan Neufeind wrote:
>> You have to give them information twice a year
>
> Well, then for a few hundered peerings send them one letter each and
> wait for a reaction :-)
Remember, these are bureaucrats… Their react
On 30 March 2012 19:27, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> For those anglophones following this from afar, Malcolm Hutty's excellent
> submission is relevant to your interests:
>
>
> https://publicaffairs.linx.net/news/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/ARCEP-2012-02-09-FINAL.pdf
>
>
And here is who is caught:
http
interesting discussion of jurisdiction.
> In the present instance, we regard ARCEP’s proposed reporting requirement as
> constituting an extra-
> territorial obligation that ought not to be applied to operators who are
> neither established in France nor
> directly providing services within Fr
On 03/30/2012 08:21 PM, Raphael MAUNIER wrote:
>
> This is now the end. The French regulator ( Arcep ) is now asking all the
> people with an ASN in France ( with a L33 license ) to get all their
> information on their peering.
[...]
> You have to give them information twice a year
Well, then f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mar 30, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Raphael MAUNIER wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> This is now the end. The French regulator ( Arcep ) is now asking all the
> people with an ASN in France ( with a L33 license ) to get all their
> information on their peering.
Hello All,
This is now the end. The French regulator ( Arcep ) is now asking all the
people with an ASN in France ( with a L33 license ) to get all their
information on their peering.
The Arcep claim it's for the "net neutrality" and still don't understand
it works because it's self regulated.
S
18 matches
Mail list logo
