Sorry Fredy, but you are living in a care bear world ? Do you think some people build an intense national backbone
You were @GPF last week, when Martin asked : Who want this to be regulated ? And Who want to have his peering controled ? why you didn't raise your hand ? In my memory, no one did. I didn't get my peering with France Telecom, so I get in touch with them and I have a fair contrat and I have a good backbone quality. In my market, I need for now direct access to them, and that's life. My business is not made on the "wishes" to have free peering with my incumbent. -- Raphaël Maunier NEO TELECOMS CTO / Directeur Ingénierie AS8218 -----Original Message----- From: Fredy Kuenzler <kuenz...@init7.net> Organization: Init Seven AG - http://www.init7.net/ Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 23:06:39 +0200 To: 'NANOG list' <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: French Regulator to ask all your information about your Peering >Am 30.03.2012 20:21, schrieb Raphael MAUNIER: >> This is now the end. The French regulator ( Arcep ) is now asking all >>the >> people with an ASN in France ( with a L33 license ) to get all their >> information on their peering. >> >> The Arcep claim it's for the "net neutrality" and still don't understand >> it works because it's self regulated. > >I suggest to stop whining. Why do we see regulators stepping in? Simply >because some networks (mainly, but not only incumbents) abused their >market >power. It doesn't surprise me that it starts in France, as it's a common >knowledge that the French incumbent has only one default answer, which is >'no'. > >> [...] >> >> You have to give them information twice a year >> >> We ( @Neo Telecoms ) and other folks in France will probably setup >> something with other carriers ( I already had some discussion with some >> of you ) to talk to them on a single voice. > >Much appreciated. They certainly will come to some automated solution >where >they can generate reports on BGP feeds we send to their route collector. >Everyone with proper route tagging should be ok and live happily. > >If, after all, the French incumbent has trouble to find an appropriate >explanation for the regulator to justify their policy, so be it... >
