On Sat, 18 Aug 2007, Steven Haigh wrote:
>
> On 18/08/2007, at 3:00 AM, Raymond L. Corbin wrote:
> >
> > I am shocked this many people responded to this post...
> >
> > -Ray
> >
>
> Just because something is possible it doesn't mean it should be done.
> It really is a Bad Idea (tm) to do stuff
stuff. Sure, it's possible - but that
doesn't make it right.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jim Popovitch
Sent: Fri 8/17/2007 12:36 PM
To: nanog
Subject: Re: DNS not working
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 12:12 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
I'm
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 12:12 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> I'm also shocked someone would actually advocate this. I'm
> sure Google wouldn't be too happy to find out about it.
This begs the question... why is the OP trying to do this with DNS
instead of a caching proxy?
-Jim P.
(no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I try adding google.com to my dns server to get more visitors
but google.com still show search engine.
For which your customers are grateful
Please advise how to do so more visitor in return? May the Gods be with you!
Mine prefers not to cheat.
--
Jeff
4 matches
Mail list logo