On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 12:12 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > I'm also shocked someone would actually advocate this. I'm > sure Google wouldn't be too happy to find out about it.
This begs the question... why is the OP trying to do this with DNS instead of a caching proxy? -Jim P. (no legal disclaimer here)
