This seems to be missing some of the reasons/why things are remarked, perhaps
it would be wise to bring some of the people interested in this to the various
vendor-specific lists or such?
For example, for some hardware types, enabling any sort of rate shaping at all
will rewrite the DSCP values
I would argue that question 9 needs an option of "Both".
Secondly, two additional good questions to ask would be: are the ECN
values presently being treated as RFC3168?
Are the ECN values being modified by any AQM implementations (WRED,
FQ_CODEL, etc) on any switch or router in transit?
Hi – Comcast is working on the implementation of ultra-low latency networking,
leveraging the IETF’s upcoming L4S standard. This standard will require passing
ECN and DSCP markings across network boundaries. As a result, we are interested
in your perspective on this and in how you handle marking
3 matches
Mail list logo
