On 1/12/09, Jim Shankland wrote:
>
> Adam Young wrote:
>
>> I wouldn't take my word for it but truthfully, you get what you pay for.
>> Given you have other, more reliable transit, adding Cogent may be ok.
>> I wouldn't rely on it for anything serious though.
>>
>
> That has not been my experienc
Adam Young wrote:
I wouldn't take my word for it but truthfully, you get what you pay for.
Given you have other, more reliable transit, adding Cogent may be ok.
I wouldn't rely on it for anything serious though.
That has not been my experience. Peering wars have been an issue, but
aside from
Mike Bartz wrote:
> I like the haiku! On a serious note, we are considering getting a
> connection from Cogent. We currently have connections to at&t, Level
> 3 and TW Telecom. The low cost and high number of peer AS number's
> seems appealing to us. Every carrier has its issues, so I don't kno
3 matches
Mail list logo
