Ivan Pepelnjak wrote:
Let me be the devil's advocate: why would you need full Internet routing?
Taking reasonably sized neighborhoods of your upstreams (AS paths up to X AS
numbers) plus a default to your best upstream might do the trick.
Ivan
We currently do exactly that - dropping anythin
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, Arie Vayner wrote:
I would second Ivan's comment.
Unless you are a major transit operator (which beats the "small ISP"
requirement), you don't really need a full view, and can do we a limited
view with a default route.
Until something breaks or the next big depeering chick
Give Vyatta on a decent x86 server a try.
http://www.vyatta.com/downloads/appbrief/Vyatta_app_BGP.pdf
-Original Message-
From: Mark Radabaugh [mailto:m...@amplex.net]
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 9:42 AM
To: nanog list
Subject: BGP Growth projections
I'm looking for new core ro
> On 2009-07-12-06:09:12, Arie Vayner wrote:
> > Unless you are a major transit operator (which beats the "small ISP"
> > requirement), you don't really need a full view, and can do we a
> > limited view with a default route.
>
> Disagree. Protection against big-provider depeerings,
> interd
On 2009-07-12-06:09:12, Arie Vayner wrote:
> Unless you are a major transit operator (which beats the "small ISP"
> requirement), you don't really need a full view, and can do we a
> limited view with a default route.
Disagree. Protection against big-provider depeerings, interdomain
capacity pro
On 10 jul 2009, at 19:03, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
IPv6 is going to explode the routing table in the next 5 years.
More like, ipv4 is going explode the routing table in the next 5
years?
IPv6 is now at something like 1.2 - 1.4 prefixes per AS. So it will
take a LONG time before we reach 100k
://blog.ioshints.info/
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mark Radabaugh [mailto:m...@amplex.net]
> > Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 6:42 PM
> > To: nanog list
> > Subject: BGP Growth projections
> >
> > I'm looking for new core routers for a
Mark Radabaugh wrote:
I'm looking for new core routers for a small ISP and having a hard time
finding something appropriate and reasonably priced. We don't have
huge traffic levels (<1Gb) and are mostly running Ethernet interfaces to
upstreams rather than legacy interfaces (when did OC3 beco
>> IPv6 is going to explode the routing table in the next 5 years.
> More like, ipv4 is going explode the routing table in the next 5
> years?
more like the routing table will continue to grow, mostly proportional
to growth in multi-homed sites and richer inter-provider topology.
randy
.info/
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Radabaugh [mailto:m...@amplex.net]
> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 6:42 PM
> To: nanog list
> Subject: BGP Growth projections
>
> I'm looking for new core routers for a small ISP and having a
> hard time
> finding something ap
On 2009-07-10-12:42:24, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
[...]
> What projections are you using regarding the default free zone over the
> next 5 years when picking new hardware?
Geoff Huston, et al provide some useful trending:
http://bgp.potaroo.net/index-bgp.html
With that said, I've been treating
Mark Radabaugh wrote:
> I'm looking for new core routers for a small ISP and having a hard time
> finding something appropriate and reasonably priced. We don't have
> huge traffic levels (<1Gb) and are mostly running Ethernet interfaces to
> upstreams rather than legacy interfaces (when did OC
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
I'm looking for new core routers for a small ISP and having a hard time
finding something appropriate and reasonably priced. We don't have huge
traffic levels (<1Gb) and are mostly running Ethernet interfaces to upstreams
rather than legacy interfa
I'm looking for new core routers for a small ISP and having a hard time
finding something appropriate and reasonably priced. We don't have
huge traffic levels (<1Gb) and are mostly running Ethernet interfaces to
upstreams rather than legacy interfaces (when did OC3 become legacy?).
Lot's
14 matches
Mail list logo
