On Wednesday, August 04, 2010 11:06:22 am Greg Whynott wrote:
> it works, i see folks creating networks of hosts under ESXi protected by an
> ASA instance.. not for production.I'm sure its not legal but Cisco
> doesn't seem to have a strong stand on it, I'd think as long as you are
> using
t; To: Xavier Beaudouin
> Cc: nanog
> Subject: Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers
>
> On Aug 4, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
>
>>
>> Le 4 août 2010 à 15:14, Mirko Maffioli a écrit :
>>
>>> 2010/7/25 Laurens Vets :
>>>>
>>>&g
On 8/4/2010 9:53 AM, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
Le 4 août 2010 à 15:14, Mirko Maffioli a écrit :
2010/7/25 Laurens Vets:
Cisco PIX: no, Cisco ASA: yes. It even runs under VMware... It's however
very hackish... :)
Cisco ASA under VMware?? :|
CiscoASA is based on x86, the
it works, i see folks creating networks of hosts under ESXi protected by an
ASA instance.. not for production.I'm sure its not legal but Cisco doesn't
seem to have a strong stand on it, I'd think as long as you are using it for
educational use and not commercial, they may not care a whole
iances for some of their
products like they did for the Nexus 1000V.
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: Daryl G. Jurbala [mailto:da...@introspect.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 10:54 AM
To: Xavier Beaudouin
Cc: nanog
Subject: Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers
On Aug 4, 2010,
On Aug 4, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
>
> Le 4 août 2010 à 15:14, Mirko Maffioli a écrit :
>
>> 2010/7/25 Laurens Vets :
>>>
>>> Cisco PIX: no, Cisco ASA: yes. It even runs under VMware... It's however
>>> very hackish... :)
>>
>> Cisco ASA under VMware?? :|
>
> CiscoASA is bas
Le 4 août 2010 à 15:14, Mirko Maffioli a écrit :
> 2010/7/25 Laurens Vets :
>>
>> Cisco PIX: no, Cisco ASA: yes. It even runs under VMware... It's however
>> very hackish... :)
>
> Cisco ASA under VMware?? :|
CiscoASA is based on x86, there is no reasons you cannot run this into VMWare
or Xe
2010/7/25 Laurens Vets :
>
> Cisco PIX: no, Cisco ASA: yes. It even runs under VMware... It's however
> very hackish... :)
Cisco ASA under VMware?? :|
--
Ciao
Mirko
The (more often than not) unofficial answer: using a custom platform
raises the entry barrier for cloning/abuse/etc. It's a bit hard to
run your appliance MIPS software on an off-the-shelf PC; but it (used)
to be possible to run PIX software on a PC (and in a VM too, IIRC.)
Cisco PIX: no, Cisc
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Tarig Yassin wrote:
> I'm wondering why the software based router is not preferable in
> business even if they have high featured Processers, and high capcity of
> memory.
>
> What is the main deferent between Appliance router and Software based routers?
http://w
> They are all software based routers... It really shouldn't matter
> whether an Appliance Application (i.e. some routing program is running
> on a minimal runtime environment ) or a routing program is running as
> part of an OS or as an Application on an OS. It is all Software until
> it
> becomes
On 7/25/2010 9:07 AM, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
>> I'm wondering why the software based router is not preferable in
>> business even if they have high featured Processers, and high capcity
>> of memory.
> It may be helpful before proceeding if you provide some examples of each, so
> we can understa
> I'm wondering why the software based router is not preferable in
> business even if they have high featured Processers, and high capcity
> of memory.
It may be helpful before proceeding if you provide some examples of each, so we
can understand your definition of a 'appliance' vs 'software rout
On Jul 25, 2010, at 12:31 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
> Tarig Yassin wrote:
>> What is the main deferent between Appliance router and Software based
>> routers?
>
> I believe the main difference is the ability to handle features at line rate
> speeds. The more interfaces/speed + CoS/ACL, the harder
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 10:20:43 +0300, Tarig Yassin said:
> I'm wondering why the software based router is not preferable in business
Sorry, but you've gone wrong already. You can't ask "why something is true"
until you first establish that the something is in fact true. There are
*plenty* of busine
The official answer: commodity hardware doesn't handle all the features needed
at "line rate".
The (more often than not) unofficial answer: using a custom platform
raises the entry barrier for cloning/abuse/etc. It's a bit hard to
run your appliance MIPS software on an off-the-shelf PC; but it (us
Tarig Yassin wrote:
What is the main deferent between Appliance router and Software based routers?
I believe the main difference is the ability to handle features at line
rate speeds. The more interfaces/speed + CoS/ACL, the harder it is for a
software based router to keep up.
Jack
Dear all
Greetings
I'm wondering why the software based router is not preferable in business even
if they have high featured Processers, and high capcity of memory.
What is the main deferent between Appliance router and Software based routers?
thank you all in adavance.
--
Tari
18 matches
Mail list logo
