questions regarding about RPKI/invalids
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 01:29:25PM +, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Ex 45.176.191.0/24 3356 3549 11172 270150
>
> RPKI ROA entry for 45.176.191.0/24-24
> Origin-AS: 265621
>
> Two questions:
>
> First, are you also seeing this on this s
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 10:35 AM Job Snijders via NANOG
wrote:
>
> I'd reject them. Why carve out an exception merely because the
> number is 'large'? :-)
>
>
To add to this, many routes does not equal lots of traffic or even
important traffic.
If it continues to be invalid, someone didn't bothe
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 01:29:25PM +, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Ex 45.176.191.0/24 3356 3549 11172 270150
>
> RPKI ROA entry for 45.176.191.0/24-24
> Origin-AS: 265621
>
> Two questions:
>
> First, are you also seeing this on this specific route?
It is visible in a few places, but the 61% sc
On Wed, 30 Mar 2022, Drew Weaver wrote:
We’ve noticed that there are a number of routes being passed along from 3356
with invalid origin AS.
Of those, almost all of them are being passed to 3356 from 3549 (legacy Global
Crossing) and there is no valid path available for any of these prefixes
Seeing this prefix with exactly same path coming from Zayo.
My path is 6461 3356 3549 11172 270150 I
Kind regards,
Andrey
Drew Weaver писал(а) 2022-03-30 09:29:
Hello,
We've noticed that there are a number of routes being passed along
from 3356 with invalid origin AS.
Of those, almost all of
Hello,
We've noticed that there are a number of routes being passed along from 3356
with invalid origin AS.
Of those, almost all of them are being passed to 3356 from 3549 (legacy Global
Crossing) and there is no valid path available for any of these prefixes (at
least according to the ROA).
6 matches
Mail list logo
