Besides Netflix, does anyone else offer CDN boxes for their services?
I'm also guessing that most content won't benefit from multicast to homes
too much?
I can see where multicast benefits sports and news (and probably catching
commercials for people). But in a world where I'm more than happy to
Cpan? Cpan minus? Or just download [1] and there's probably a Make::Maker
or similar Build.PL to build a makefile or just install it for you -
there's a #perl channel on freenode if you need more and Google doesn't get
you set.
1.
http://search.cpan.org/~chromatic/Modern-Perl-1.20161005/lib/Modern
The OP is also asking someone to register a throwaway email, subscribe, and
respond "yes" so that the owner can't be tracked to their employer. That's
kind of a steep ask for something that's almost moot.
On May 9, 2016 23:16, "Greg Sowell" wrote:
I haven't had a request in ages...back then all o
AFAIK (IDK how either) this hasn't been a big issue in the past few years.
Is it really worth worrying about? I notified the MARC admin and it was
removed there within a few hours too - a dozen easily tracked messages in a
few hours and a few hours after that, it's done (or more like, filteres).
N
Hey!
New message, please read <http://funezy.com/outside.php?rl5>
shawn wilson
---
Този имейл е проверен за вируси от Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Hey!
New message, please read <http://kovvali.org/matter.php?sj44>
shawn wilson
---
Този имейл е проверен за вируси от Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On Oct 16, 2015 6:52 AM, "MKS" wrote:
>
> Now I'm looking for an inexpensive url-filtering database, for integration
> into a squid like solution.
> Perhaps there is another mailing-list more relevant for this kind of
issues?
Squid like or squid? I'd ask on the squid list if there's nothing her
On Jun 22, 2015 6:14 PM, "William Herrin" wrote:
>
>
> Two-way satellite systems based on SV's in geostationary orbit (like
> the two you're considering) have high latency. 22,000 miles out,
> another 22,000 miles back and do it again for the return packet.
Just a minor nitpick - that's 22,300 m
On Jun 23, 2015 6:26 AM, "Nick Hilliard" wrote:
>
>
> Blocking NTP at the NTP edge will probably work fine for most situations.
> Bear in mind that your NTP edge is not necessarily the same as your
network
> edge. E.g. you might have internal GPS / radio sources which could
> unexpectedly inject
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015, 08:29 Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 01:15:41PM +0100,
> Tony Finch wrote
> a message of 15 lines which said:
>
> > The problems are that UTC is unpredictable,
>
> That's because the earth rotation is unpredictable. Any time based on
> this buggy pla
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015, 14:16 Harlan Stenn wrote:
>
> shawn wilson writes:
> > ... I mean letting computers figure out slower earth rotation on the
> > fly would seem more accurate than leap seconds anyway. And then all of
> > us who do earthly things and would like simp
On Jun 19, 2015 2:05 PM, "Saku Ytti" wrote:
>
> On (2015-06-19 13:06 -0400), Jay Ashworth wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> > The IERS will be adding a second to time again on my birthday;
> >
> > 2015-06-30T23:59:60
>
> Hopefully this is last leap second we'll ever see. Non-monotonic time is
an
> abomination a
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Nick B wrote:
> Having worked for several departments like this, I can assure you her
> flustsration was not about her "inability to hire competent people" or "the
> lack of her superiors to prioritize the modernization project". Unless you
> have worked for the F
On Jun 17, 2015 8:56 PM, "Ronald F. Guilmette"
wrote:
>
>
> *) The Director of the Office of Personnel Management, Ms. Katherine
> Archueta was warned, repeatedly, and over several years, by her
> own department's Inspector General (IG) that many of OPM's systems
> we
On Jun 11, 2015 7:07 AM, "jim deleskie" wrote:
>
> There is a good reason there aren't LOTS of "good" neteng in the 30-35 or
> under 30 range with lots of experience. Its call the hell we went though
> for a while after 2000 working in this industry. Many of us lost jobs and
> couldn't find new
On Jun 8, 2015 10:11 PM, "Shane Ronan" wrote:
>
> Certs have ruined the industry.
Certs have made the industry more interesting. After all, without certs,
we'd have less stupid to point at and laugh (or scream). And HR screeners
would need to know something about the position they're screening.
On Jun 8, 2015 1:42 AM, "shawn wilson" wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 7, 2015 10:59 PM, "Jay Ashworth" wrote:
> >
>
> > I don't
> > RTFM, I google. It's often faster, so many of TFMs are online now.
> >
>
> Until Google supports reg
On Jun 7, 2015 10:59 PM, "Jay Ashworth" wrote:
>
> I don't
> RTFM, I google. It's often faster, so many of TFMs are online now.
>
Until Google supports regex and some of the duckduckgo module features,
I'll be faster getting to reference to you will on Google. Notice I said
reference, not an an
On Jun 7, 2015 4:12 AM, "Joshua Riesenweber"
wrote:
>
> (In my experience it takes more time to study a certification track than
to learn just what you need to get a job done.)
>
Stated different, no job is going to teach you how to pass a cert. And no
cert is going to teach a job. One can help
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 6:53 AM, Brandon Ross wrote:
>> I also concur. There is most certainly a negative correlation between certs
>> and clue in my experience, having met 10s of certificate holders.
>
> Oh good. Maybe my total lack of ever pur
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 8:33 AM, tvest wrote:
> You are such an optimist ;-)
>
> Sometimes those who can remember the past get to repeat it anyway.
>
I remember seeing a slide deck for devs saying all new web apps are
recreating mail, write, wall, and finger (the person posted it on FB,
so of cour
My first thought on reading that was "who the hell cares if a person
knows about internet culture". But than I had to reconsider - it's a
very apt way of telling if someone read the right books :)
I would also add Ritchie, Thompson, and Diffie to that list (since you
ask about Larry, it's only app
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 9:57 PM, James Laszko wrote:
> I asked one of my guys to tracert in windows for something and he executed
> pathping. I have never seen that in 25 years Go figure!
>
Yep, I learned something new (though IDK I'll ever use it - I'm
guessing it's useless trivia, esp sin
Well, I was kinda thinking this would turn out to be a dumb question / have
an obvious answer. Apparently not. But it seems I can't go buy a solution
either. I guess there isn't much of a market (though I am just talking
software - maybe someone could make an update :) ).
Is there a way to stack PDUs? like, with 30A 220, we need more plugs
than power but I'd like them to communicate to make sure we don't over
power the circuit. Do any APC or Triplite systems support this?
On May 28, 2015 10:11 AM, "Christopher Morrow"
wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 5:29 AM, Robert Kisteleki wrote:
> >
> >> Bcrypt or PBKDF2 with random salts per password is really what anyone
> >> storing passwords should be using today.
> >
One thing to remember is the hardware determines num
Ok I've got a few comments offlist too and they all seem to draw the same
conclusion - crimp your own length. Thanks all for the input.
On Apr 17, 2015 4:11 PM, "William Herrin" wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Joe McLeod wrote:
> > Or you build the cable to fit the span. I must be get
Asked archive.org?
On Apr 18, 2015 12:03 PM, "Roy" wrote:
>
> Is there an archive of POCs for some of the early netblocks (1985 or so)?
> We are trying to figure out some corporate history.
>
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Bob Evans wrote:
> You must build them if you want the professional look. No way around that
> - unless you want to take up rack space with some sort of cable management
> wrapping system and that becomes a pain to make future changes or replace
> cables.
>
>> Or
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Justin Wilson - MTIN wrote:
> Copper and fiber patch panels are key. This way you can control the length
> from the patch to the device (router, switch,server).
>
Yeah, I am talking about just the runs in the rack - I don't see
a(nother) patch panel helping here
This is probably a stupid question, but
We've got a few racks in a colo. The racks don't have any decent cable
management (square metal holes to attach velcro to). We either order
cable too long and end up with lots of loops which get in the way (no
place to loop lots of excess really) or too
On Apr 8, 2015 7:19 AM, "Rob Seastrom" wrote:
>
>
> Blair Trosper writes:
>
> > MaxMind (a great product)
>
> I've heard anecdotal accounts of MaxMind intentionally marking all
> address blocks assigned to a VPN vendor as "open proxy" even when
> advised repeatedly that the disputed addresses (a)
On Mar 12, 2015 11:01 AM, "Ca By" wrote:
>
> For the first time to the public
>
http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf
>
> Enjoy.
Uh yeah, I'll wait for the reviews when y'all get done trudging through
that...
On Jan 8, 2015 4:23 AM, "Franck Martin" wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 7, 2015, at 10:38 AM, shawn wilson wrote:
>
> > Is there a list of NIC (and other popular whois server) features (what
> > can be searched on) and what data they provide (and what title they
> >
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 11:23 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
> Google is your friend.
>
Woops, you're right
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 10:22 PM, John Levine wrote:
> ARIN, APNIC, and RIPE have prototypes already that are a lot easier to
> script than the text WHOIS.
>
Meaning the data structure is in place or they have a RDAP service up?
If so, is it publicly accessible?
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:32 PM, anthony kasza wrote:
> Scripting languages have modules that can parse many registrar whois
> formats. However, most are incomplete due to the plurality of output formats
> as stated above. I, and i suspect many others, wouls *love* to see a more
> concrete key valu
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>>> So, you’re not running into a poorly-documented mystery, you’ve run afoul
>>> of one of the rotten armpits of the shub-Internet.
>>>
>> So there's no consensus between NICs for the information they should
>> have in whois and what search me
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>
>> On Jan 7, 2015, at 10:38 AM, shawn wilson wrote:
>>
>> Is there a list of NIC (and other popular whois server) features (what
>> can be searched on) and what data they provide (and what title they
>> gi
Is there a list of NIC (and other popular whois server) features (what
can be searched on) and what data they provide (and what title they
give it)?
A quick search yields:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-358
https://www.arin.net/resources/whoisrws/whois_diff.html
https://www.apnic.net/apnic-inf
On Jan 4, 2015 8:04 AM, "Rob Seastrom" wrote:
>
>
> symack writes:
>
> > Hello Everyone,
> >
> > Have a few FC cards and a switch that I would like to use for backplane
> > related packets (ie, local network). I am totally new to FC and would
like
> > to know will I need a router to be able to co
I asked on this on another list I'm on and didn't get any reply, so I
figured I might have better luck here
Anyone know what malware.watch. is doing? Below is basically
everything I could find:
http://www.robtex.net/en/advisory/dns/watch/malware/ssl-scanning-015/
They've got a web page, but noth
./CN=Starfield Root Certificate Authority - G2
2 s:/C=US/ST=Arizona/L=Scottsdale/O=Starfield Technologies,
Inc./CN=Starfield Root Certificate Authority - G2
i:/C=US/O=Starfield Technologies, Inc./OU=Starfield Class 2
Certification Authority
---
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 1:21 PM, shawn wilson wrot
.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:57 AM, shawn wilson wrote:
> We get lots of probes from subdomains of southwestdoor.com and
> secureserver.net 's SOA and I'm curious who these guys are?
>
> The only web page I could find was southwestdoor redirects to
> http://www.arcad
We get lots of probes from subdomains of southwestdoor.com and
secureserver.net 's SOA and I'm curious who these guys are?
The only web page I could find was southwestdoor redirects to
http://www.arcadiacustoms.com and then to http://arcadia-custom.com/
(a hardware company is causing unwanted netw
On Oct 20, 2014 11:54 PM, "Doug Barton" wrote:
>
> On 10/20/14 4:07 PM, shawn wilson wrote:
>>
>>
>> Do we really have any prior examples that are even .1 the size of the
>> usgov public system? Again, I'm not just referring to BIND and Windows
On Oct 20, 2014 9:33 PM, "Bill Woodcock" wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 21, 2014, at 9:23 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> > Breaking tons of things is an interesting opinion of "why not”.
>
> Eh. Off the top of my head, I see two categories of breakage:
>
>1) things that hard-code a list of “real” TLDs, and
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> 3. Set a target date for the removal of those TLDs for 10 years in the
> future
>
Because this worked for IPv6?
> Obviously there are various implementation details for effecting the move,
> but application-layer stuff will be as obvious to
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:44 AM, wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:45:44 -0400, shawn wilson said:
>
>> 3. I don't want to see the report on how many Allaire ColdFusion with
>> NT 3.5 .gov sites are out there
>>
>> any other reasons not to do this? May
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Stephen Satchell wrote:
> On 10/20/2014 07:20 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 05:58:01 -0400, shawn wilson said:
>>
>>> Bad idea. I'm betting we'd find half of gov web sites down due to not being
&g
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:20 AM, wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 05:58:01 -0400, shawn wilson said:
>
>> Bad idea. I'm betting we'd find half of gov web sites down due to not being
>> able to reboot and issues in old coldfusion and IIS and the like (and
>> needi
On Oct 19, 2014 9:53 AM, "Mike." wrote:
>
>
> I'd rather see .gov (and by implication, .edu) usage phased out and
> replaced by country-specific domain names (e.g. fed.us).
>
> imo, the better way to fix an anachronism is not to bend the rules so
> the offenders are not so offensive, but to bring
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 8:21 AM, shawn wilson wrote:
> [snip]
>> So, kinda the same idea - just put IPMI on another network and use ssh
>> forwards to it. You can have multiple boxes connected in this fashion
>> but
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
>
> Java only used for mouting images. KVM is transfered via VNC protocol iirc.
They're not re-inventing the wheel, but I think KVM is generally some
VNC stream embedded in http(s) which VNC clients can't seem to
understand (at least, at a gl
iLo is a value add to HP. DRAC sucks (so I'd replace it and then Dell
would have hardware under support with some unknown IPMI). Supermicro,
Tyan, etc - idk. Really, it would be nice to have an open card that
does this. Even if the card were limited to what you could do with DMA
and some serial (i2
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> My IPMI (super micro) you can put v6 and v4 filters into for protecting the
> ip space from trusted sources. Has my home static ip ranges and a few
> intermediary ranges that I also have access to.
>
Mmmm, and an ip has never been spoofed an
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> I use OpenVPN to access an Admin/sandboxed network with insecure portals,
>> wiki, and ipmi.
>
> h. 'cept when it is the openvpn server's ipmi. but good hack. i
> may use it, as i already do openvpn. thanks.
>
So, kinda the same idea -
But it doesn't really matter if you zero out freed memory. Maybe it'll
prevent you from gaining some stale session info and the like. But even if
that were the case, this would still be a serious bug - you're not going to
reread your private key before encrypting each bit of data after all -
that'd
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:52 AM, wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:07:36 +0100, Fabien Bourdaire said:
>
>> # Log rules
>> iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 443 -m u32 --u32 \
>> "52=0x1803:0x1803" -j LOG --log-prefix "BLOCKED: HEARTBEAT"
>
> That 52= isn't going to work if it's
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Sholes, Joshua
wrote:
> On 3/13/14, 7:35 PM, "Larry Sheldon" wrote:
>
>>Not sure I can agree with that. I have been in this game for a very
>>long time, but for most of it in places where the world's population
>>cleaved neatly into two parts: "Authorized Users"
On Mar 13, 2014 7:37 PM, "Larry Sheldon" wrote:
>
> On 3/13/2014 8:22 AM, Sholes, Joshua wrote:
>>
>> On 3/13/14, 12:35 AM, "shawn wilson" wrote:
>>>
>>> A note on terminology - whether you know what you're doing, actually
break
On Mar 11, 2014 3:09 AM, "Dobbins, Roland" wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 11, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Markus wrote:
>
> > Any advice?
>
> Start with CERT-BUND, maybe?
>
That is the correct answer, if you want something less settle (and possibly
illegal), there were discussions on 'hacking back'. That is, basical
db is logarithmic, .3 might be enough to matter?
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Dan Shoop wrote:
>
> On Feb 20, 2014, at 4:08 AM, shawn wilson wrote:
>
>> A while ago I got Comcast's business service. Semi-idle connections
>> are get dropped (I haven't really diagnosed t
ed with before on other jobs. He managed to get a hold
> of one of the SMCs from their warehouse. No more issues.
>
> -A
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:08 AM, shawn wilson wrote:
>
>> A while ago I got Comcast's business service. Semi-idle connections
>> are get
A while ago I got Comcast's business service. Semi-idle connections
are get dropped (I haven't really diagnosed this - I just no that it
isn't the client or server but some network in between). However the
second and most obvious issue is that intermittently, the service will
grind to a halt:
--- 8
Does anyone have a list of all of the ranges Microsoft uses for
Windows Update? I've found domains but not a full list of subnets.
Doh, tired and not reading - the util should help after you get a dump
though.
On Jan 13, 2014 7:29 AM, "shawn wilson" wrote:
> dd kmem and see if it's what you'd expect (size of ram+swap). If so you
> should be able to look at it
>
> Also see Volatility
&g
dd kmem and see if it's what you'd expect (size of ram+swap). If so you
should be able to look at it
Also see Volatility
On Jan 13, 2014 7:21 AM, "Tassos Chatzithomaoglou"
wrote:
> Saku Ytti wrote on 13/1/2014 12:51:
> > On (2014-01-13 12:46 +0200), Saku Ytti wrote:
> >> On (2014-01-13 12:26 +02
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
> This whole backdoor business is a very, very, dangerous game.
While I agree with this (and the issues brought up with NSA's NIST
approved PRNG that RSA used). If I were in their shoes, I would have
been collecting every bit of data I could (ie,
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Lorell Hathcock wrote:
> NANOG:
>
> Here's the really scary question for me.
>
> Would it be possible for NSA-payload traffic that originates on our private
> networks that is destined for the NSA to go undetected by our IDS systems?
>
Yup. Absolutely. Without a d
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
>
> I hope Cisco, Juniper, and others respond quickly with updated images for
> all platforms affected before the details leak.
So, if this plays out nice (if true, it won't), the fix will come
months before the disclosure. Think, if you're leasi
Saku Ytti wrote:
>On (2013-12-30 20:30 +1100), sten rulz wrote:
>
>I really think we're doing disservice to an issue which might be at
>scale of
>human-rights issue, by spamming media with 0 data news. Where is this
>backdoor? How does it work? How can I recreate on my devices?
I don't really
Chris Adams wrote:
>Once upon a time, Shawn Wilson said:
>> I was hoping someone could give technical insight into why this is
>good or not and not just "buy a box branded as a router because I said
>so or your business will fail". I'm all for hearing about the
This has gotten a bit ridiculous.
I was hoping someone could give technical insight into why this is good or not
and not just "buy a box branded as a router because I said so or your business
will fail". I'm all for hearing about the business theory of running an ISP
(not my background or day
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 1:33 AM, wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 11:16:53 -0800, Seth Mattinen said:
>> On 12/26/13, 9:24, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
>> >
>> > If he can afford a 10G link... he should be buying real gear... I mean,
>> > look, I've got plenty of infrastructure horror stories, but lets no
Totally agree that a routing box should be standalone for tons of reasons. Even
separating network routing and call routing.
It used to be that BSD's network stack was much better than Linux's under load.
I'm not sure if this is still the case - I've never been put in the situation
where the Li
I'm not sure of te topology around there, but you can get these 2.4Ghz
dishes for *cheap* (I got one at a hamfest for $20 - spent as much on the
rp-sma converter cost almost as much). If someone (or a colo) is near
there, you might convince them to put up the same thing and work with that.
I think
0:00 AM, Christopher Morrow <
morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Shawn Wilson wrote:
> >
> >
> > Christopher Morrow wrote:
> >>On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Don Wilder
> >>wrote:
> >>> I wrote a script in
Christopher Morrow wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Don Wilder
>wrote:
>> I wrote a script in Linux that watches for unauthorized login
>attempts and
>> adds the ip address to the blocked list in my firewall. You might
>want to
>> search sourceforge for a DYN Firewall and modify it fro
There are indeed "FreePublicWiFi" nodes in some areas like Dupont Circle but
it's not very convenient most of the time (signal strength or speed issues).
IIRC there's a Commotion mesh around Columbia Heights which should be much
faster. Personally, I just use a Mifi and never have any issues.
On Jul 14, 2013 5:36 AM, "Bill Woodcock" wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 14, 2013, at 2:12 AM, shawn wilson wrote:
>
>> You're on a continent with the second least amount of light pollution
>> of all of the continents on earth (iirc) and are somehow surprised
>&g
You're on a continent with the second least amount of light pollution
of all of the continents on earth (iirc) and are somehow surprised
about bad net access? I would question the wisdom of planning a tech
conference there, but not the facility itself.
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 4:16 AM, David Conrad
Well, I think Google has the right idea with providing Internet by floating
balloons. And the way that cell phone tech has been improving, we might all
have 10G in... 10 years or so?
If Google is providing it, it'll be monitored by our government but hey,
we'll have enough bandwidth to hang oursel
On Jun 29, 2013 12:23 AM, "Christopher Morrow"
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Octavio Alvarez
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:20:21 -0700, Christopher Morrow
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> "Runs in top of UDP"... "Is not UDP"...
> >>
> >> If it has protocol set to 17 it is UDP.
> >
>
al rack mountables with management? We're
> looking at these for our remote sites.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On Jun 24, 2013, at 6:10 AM, Måns Nilsson
> wrote:
> >
> >> Subject: Re: PDU recommendations Date: Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 09:3
So, that's not a very good endorsement :)
Idk why you'd use a fuse in a PDU.
The management interface can be rebooted without taking anything down on
the TrippLite but it's at a colo and it *shouldn't* time out like it does.
I think of this like a vehicle computer - if it goes down, you might sti
I know, old) turning on/off outlets than either of APC or TrippLite.
>
> -Petter
>
>
> From: trit...@cox.net [trit...@cox.net]
> Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2013 12:05 PM
> To: shawn wilson; North American Network Operators Group
> Subject:
We currently use Triplite stuff but they've got an issue where after a few
minutes, they stop accepting new tcp connections. We're adding a new 30A
circuit and I'm thinking of going with APC (ran them in the past and never
had any issues). However, I figured I'd see if there was a better brand /
sp
RFC 3587 - IPv6 Global Unicast Address Format
On Jun 22, 2013 6:50 AM, "John Curran" wrote:
> On Jun 22, 2013, at 1:45 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> > Yes… It will probably settle out somewhere around 100-125K routes.
>
> Owen -
>
> Can you elaborate some on this estimate? (i.e. what approximati
I think ICANN would have to add a delay in where a request was sent out to
make sure everyone was on the same page and then what happens the couple
thousand (more) times a day that someone isn't updated or is
misconfigured?
I think Netsol should be fined. Maybe even a class action suite filed
aga
Johnathan is correct about not using perl for this. There are some iptables
modules, but they're all out of date or incomplete (I mention this because
if you get around to making them work decent, I'll love you for it).
Otherwise, perl -> IPC::Run -> ipt isn't going to gain you anything. And
I'd be
Getting back to the topic. I just saw quite a few of our hosts scanned
for this by 192.111.155.106 which doesn't say much on its own as
http://dacentec.com/ is a hosting company.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Ricky Beam wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 22:52:52 -0400, Jimmy Hess wrote:
>>
>> Who
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Aaron Glenn wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:17 AM, shawn wilson wrote:
>>
>>
>> Banks and insurance companies supposedly have some interesting actuarial
>> data on this.
>>
>
> Do you know of any publicly available s
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:51 AM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On 6/12/13, shawn wilson wrote:
>>> The scope is constantly changing.
>> Not really. The old tricks are the best tricks. And when a default install
> By best, you must mean effective against the greatest number of target
This is basically untrue. I can deal with a good rant as long as there's
some value in it. As it is (I'm sorta sorry) I picked this apart.
On Jun 12, 2013 12:04 AM, "Ricky Beam" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 22:55:12 -0400, wrote:
>>
>
> But seriously, how do you measure one's security?
Banks
On Jun 6, 2013 9:30 PM, "Jeff Kell" wrote:
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 6/6/2013 9:22 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> > On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 21:12:35 -0400, "Robert Mathews (OSIA)" said:
> >> On 6/6/2013 7:35 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> >>> [ . ] Happily, no
If anyone is interrested, here's a little Perl CLI util to lookup what
countries registered networks within a block. There's no documentation
yet, it's a .pl where it should probably be a command with a makefile
installer, and Net::CIDR overlaps Net::IP. At any rate, hopefully it
is useful to someo
I knew this would come up. Actually I'm surprised and glad it waited until
I got a solution first.
I'll address a few points:
- this is mainly to stop stupid things from sending packets from countries
we will probably never want to do business with (I'm looking mainly at that
big country under APN
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On 2013-05-23, at 16:56, shawn wilson wrote:
>
>> It looks you're right and everyone does have the same data in
>> historical format. Looks like RIPE has everything compiled into what
>> is current. So if a b
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:40 PM, shawn wilson wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
>>
>> On 2013-05-23, at 15:47, shawn wilson wrote:
>>
>>
>> ftp://ftp.apnic.net/public/apnic/stats/apnic/
>> ftp://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/dbase/
>
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
