--- On Sun, 2/20/11, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Oh, I expect CGN/LSN to be connectivity of last resort, no
> question.
Ok, so let's just deploy it and not even try to fix it? Even when it is a
required functionality for IPv6-only hosts to access the IPv4 domain? That'll
go down real well with end-us
--- On Sun, 2/20/11, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> So, in essence, you are advocating not to
>> interconnect the IPv4-only and IPv6-only domains in any way?
>
> I'm advocating not depending on any such interaction
> working as it's pretty clear that
> the available solution set is fairly broken.
Fair
--- On Sat, 2/19/11, Owen DeLong wrote:
> > Are you willing to bet that IPv4 address
> exhaustion will not result in IPv6-only hosts before we run
> out of meaningful IPv4-only hosts?
> No, but, I am willing to bet that we will not meaningfully
> make the situation better for those IPv4-only host
--- On Sat, 2/19/11, Owen DeLong wrote:
> You only need to solve those problems to the
> extent that there are meaningful things still
> trapped in an IPv4-only world.
Are you willing to bet that IPv4 address exhaustion will not result in
IPv6-only hosts before we run out of meaningful IPv4-onl
--- On Fri, 2/18/11, Owen DeLong wrote:
> > Now correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't some kind of
> NAT/PAT going to be required to join the IPv4 and IPv6
> domains in all foreseeable futures? If so, aren't we going
> to have to deal with these issues in any case?
> >
> No, we need to move forward
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 14:17, Chris Grundemann wrote:
> In case you have not already found this:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-donley-nat444-impacts-01
There's a bit of critique on the NAT444 document on the BEHAVE IETF WG list.
"draft-donley-nat444-impacts-01 is somewhat misleading. It
With marketing campaigns like these, no consumer will want to use IPv6, if it
becomes associated with privacy problems.
http://torrentfreak.com/huge-security-flaw-makes-vpns-useless-for-bittorrent-100617/
It is, of course, totally irrelevant whether the reporting is factually correct
or even ba
Hi!
I seem to suffer from an acute lack of 10GE CWDM optics options. Is it just me
or am I just looking in all the wrong places?
You'd think that by now there would be an upgrade market from 1GE to 10GE. DWDM
wavelenghts are not always available, but CWDM often are.
- Zed
Hi all!
There's been some discussion on the list regarding software routers lately and
this piqued my interest. Does anybody have any recent performance and
capability statistics (eg. forwarding rates with full BGP tables and N ethernet
interfaces) or any pointer to what the current state of ar
9 matches
Mail list logo
