suggestion if this concern for status quo of lawlessness
was based on flimsy ground as you make it out to be -
https://www.uscourts.gov/rules-policies/archives/suggestions/suresh-kalkunte-16-cv-g)
like I have and they say this path of enquiry is based on falsehood, go
ahead, call it a conspiracy.
When you
020, Jon Sands wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2020, 8:00 PM Suresh Kalkunte wrote:
>
>> raw garlic assimilation
>>
>
> This thread is definitely going to be used in a future court case
>
>>
>> Following staff home and picking them off with a rifle is so much
>> cheaper and carries a better probability of success.
>>
And give law enforcement much better probability of success as well.
> The safety measures were thorough and
> rigorous: it would have been very hard to
> screw up and ev
t-Charles?entry=gmail&source=g>
> P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7
> Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.netFax: 514-990-9443
>
> On 11/5/20 10:22 AM, Suresh Kalkunte wrote:
>
> > Can you provide a case where this may
> > have happened?
> &g
x.netFax: 514-990-9443
>
> On 11/4/20 12:24 PM, Matt Harris wrote:
>
> Matt Harris
>
> |
>
> Infrastructure Lead Engineer
>
> 816‑256‑5446
>
> |
>
> Direct
>
> *Looking for something?*
>
> *Helpdesk Portal <https://help.netfire.net/>*
>
> |
> ...who THINKS he MIGHT have identified
> something to the contrary does not instantly
> disqualify the thousands of studies that have
> already been completed on the topic
>
I am not a doctor. The majority of results you refer to is equivalent to
the Sun' impact on human situated on Earth's surfa
that reason, it's unfair to dismiss a physician's suggestion to
> look into a case as an "internet conspiracy". That's all.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sabri
>
>
> - On Nov 4, 2020, at 7:23 PM, Suresh Kalkunte
> wrote:
>
> Existing research on health effect
Oops, meant include this reference
*1 Mashevich M, Folkman D, Kesar A, et. al. Exposure of human peripheral
blood lymphocytes
to electromagnetic fields associated with cellular phones leads to
chromosomal instability.
Bioelectromagnetics. 2003;24:82–90.
On Thursday, November 5, 2020, Suresh
Hello,
> ...I agree with Suresh that at this time, there
> is no scientific evidence that links RF with
> any kind of bodily harm.
>
Please note that there is scientific evidence to link chronic exposure to
RF result in chromosome instability*1, however there is no diagnostic test
to attribute a d
iracy
>> theory
>> > nuttiness seems to be very high and the level of knowledge of basic
>> physics
>> > seems to be very low, but since this list is archived in a way that
>> lay-people
>> > may reference it at some point in the future, I'm going to go
lace safety in the ambit of internal sabotage, be it data
center or elsewhere.
On Thursday, November 5, 2020, William Herrin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 11:37 AM Suresh Kalkunte
> wrote:
> > Your comments gives me an overall impression that data center equipment
> are on average a
r
> 816‑256‑5446
> | Direct
> Looking for something?
> *Helpdesk Portal* <https://help.netfire.net/>
> | *Email Support*
> | *Billing Portal* <https://my.netfire.net/>
> We build and deliver end‑to‑end IT solutions.
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 10:48 AM Suresh Kalkunte
ngineer
> 816‑256‑5446
> | Direct
> Looking for something?
> *Helpdesk Portal* <https://help.netfire.net/>
> | *Email Support*
> | *Billing Portal* <https://my.netfire.net/>
> We build and deliver end‑to‑end IT solutions.
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 10:48 AM Suresh
ed
X-ray tube) during this lifetime to be committed to developing
diagnostic/forensic tests and making you all aware of this in the spirit of
'fore warned is fore armed'.
Regards,
Suresh
On Wednesday, November 4, 2020, William Herrin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 8:49 AM S
Hello,
I believe the below described method of causing intentional (1) damage to
equipment in data centers and (2) physical injury to a person at the
workplace is on-topic for the NANOG community, if not, I look forward to
your feedback. As a software developer who has subscribed to the NANOG
mail
15 matches
Mail list logo
