> On 17/01/2017, at 12:47 pm, Theodore Baschak wrote:
>
> I haven't ever tried to do multiple public IPs (I only enable caching server
> once inside my home network as a test), but it looks like from the settings
> window that it is possible to have more than one public IP using your cache.
> h
> On 14/01/2017, at 6:25 am, Blake Hudson wrote:
>
> lane.pow...@swat.coop wrote on 1/13/2017 7:43 AM:
>> I saw the apple caching server mentioned on an earlier thread. Is this
>> appropriate/functional/scaleable enough to implement as an ISP? It is an
>> intriguing idea. From the docs I could
Our DC (granted, not in the US!) charges a one-off fee of $75 to install the
XC, which includes the cable too. Terminated to a 1U patch panel at TOR. Only
one end pays the 1-off charge (the customer that requested the order). No
ongoing charges. No one else rummages in the overheads other than
Maybe it's time to use some reverse-psychology and try connecting through a
VPN provider? ;-)
Pete
Ps, I hope you succeed in getting an answer from an actual engineer. But if I
were a betting man...
> On 2/06/2016, at 3:27 pm, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
>
> Every device in my house i
> On 28/04/2016, at 6:36 pm, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 04:30:23 -, Ryan Finnesey said:
>> I was wondering if anyone had any recommendations on carrier grade fax boards
>> that are SIP based?
>
> What would "carrier grade" even *mean* for a fax board?
I took it to
Very succiently put, Owen!
I concur.
Is anything the ISP could avoid to alleviate this occurrence, or is it
entirely a 'server-side' issue to resolve?
Pete
> On 4/01/2016, at 8:42 pm, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> As I understand it, the problem being discussed is an oscillation that is
> creat
rvice
which was in the subject header.
Apologies for any confusion & full creds to dslreports!
Pete
On 11/11/2015, at 5:19 PM, Pete Mundy wrote:
>
> I see they support speed-test via IPv6 testing! Good job & kudos to them! :)
>
> I just wish their Australian server was p
I see they support speed-test via IPv6 testing! Good job & kudos to them! :)
I just wish their Australian server was part of the IPv6 selection pool.
150+ms to the nearest one from down here.
Pete
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On 30/09/2015, at 6:19 AM, Matthew Walster wrote:
> "lolz" as the kids say.
Current stats indicate it's actually only the old-timers that say lolz now
days! ;)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/facebook-study-laughter_55c8b148e4b0f1cbf1e5857e
Pete
On 10/06/2015 11:59 PM, "John Levine" wrote:
>
> Does anyone keep lists of the exit addresses of public VPN services?
You can get all known commercial v4 VPN endpoints with one declaration:
0.0.0.0/0
That'll guarantee you catch em!
Good luck :)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic
On 8/12/2014, at 5:48 AM, Teleric Team wrote:
> Again, with 64byte packet size? Or are you talking MTU?
You have a very good point. My 1gig tests have always been for throughput
rather than pps, and therefore was using MTU sized packets and though would be
much less load on the CPU.
Pete
s
On 11/11/2014, at 1:35 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
> I have not tried doing that myself, but the only thing that would even be
> possible that I know of is thunderbolt.
> A new MacBook Pro and one of these maybe:
> http://www.sonnettech.com/product/echoexpresssel_10gbeadapter.html
Or one of the
12 matches
Mail list logo
