I actually think it's important to have contact information publicly
available. I realize this opens the door for abuse, but I've found that
using a call screening service (Google Voice) at least provides a bit of
shield.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Justin Vocke wrote:
> Sent this little e-
Racktables does support IPv6.
http://demo.racktables.org/
Login: admin
PW: admin
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Eric A Louie wrote:
> Racktables = no IPv6. Bummer, and it does more than what I need.
>
> Netdot looks very interesting. It didn't show up when I searched for
> "IPAM".
> I'll
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Tom Lanyon wrote:
> Finally - are there any reasons to avoid running next-hop-self on ibgp
> sessions? The upside is we get to avoid distributing all of our transit/peer
> upstream point to point links into the rest of the network. Again, I
> understand this
, and processes) that raising MTU in your
network might be an easier proposition. Thought you might have went
into it a bit in the video, that's all. Any insight?
-M
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Jan Schaumann wrote:
> Matt Hite wrote:
>> Might someone have the video for this pr
Might someone have the video for this presentation in their personal stash?
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog51/presentations/Monday/NANOG51.Talk45.nanog51-Schaumann.pdf
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog51/abstracts.php?pt=MTc1MyZuYW5vZzUx&nm=nanog51
It would be much appreciated!
-M
Sure. Sometimes it's nice/convenient to let firewalls advertise the
external blocks they use for NAT translations, etc. Otherwise you need
to statically route them to the firewall and redistribute the statics
from said routers into your IGP.
Also, in some cases, people want to do network-based loa
Now if only the slides were the full screen and the talking head was
in the corner... otherwise the quality is fantastic!
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
> Much better now. Probably was just me.
>
> John Springer wrote:
>>
>> Chromebook Flash 2 working OK in Pacific NW. Some ti
You didn't mention, but are you introducing a second border router? Is
the new upstream circuit from a new provider, or is it a second,
redundant circuit to the same provider in a different POP? Does your
customer have their own portable address space, or are they using
provider address space?
I'l
Hi Kevin,
Someone may want to throw RST traffic your way by spoofing their own
source (as you) and machine gunning TCP ACK or SYN packets to Internet
hosts such as this AT&T customer. Just a nice way of throwing traffic
at you in a fairly undetectable manner.
Just a guess,
-M
On Sun, Jun 27, 20
9 matches
Mail list logo
