the NAT64 support in ASA (although it sadly doesn't support the
Well-Known Prefix) -- no love in ScreenOS, as far as I've ever found.
- Jima
> On Apr 2, 2018, at 16:58, Joe Klein wrote:
>
> All,
>
> At security and network tradeshows over the last 15 years, I have asked
o's
email). Weird corner cases abound, but it sounds like someone dropped
the ball on getting this corrected. Tsk.
- Jima
om AfriNIC.
One might consider Hulu et al not so at-fault with that fact in
consideration.
- Jima
lso, I doubt the vast majority of CenturyLink's residential customer
base a) has non-tunneled IPv6 or b) receives a /48.)
If anyone from AS209 wants to clean up those SWIPs, they're welcome to
ping me off-list. :-)
- Jima
t with "I don't care about this, so fooey on your
initiative."
There may be a pointed statement in there -- thanks. ;-)
Jima
later AS35916
withdrew the announcement entirely, possibly because of the traffic
engineering implications of that filtering (not sure).
Short-term, it's a win, but long-term we may not have seen the last of
this prefix.
Jima
On 2017-08-03 06:24, Jima wrote:
A few years back, Ronald
fixes had one less upstream.
Years later now, I have a different job, and a circuit with AS209. I'll
see if I can't scare someone up (if it's still active by the time I get
into the office).
Thanks Ronald. Rest assured that many of us remember. :-)
Jima
On 2017-08-03 05
request, as long as you have a logical addressing
plan to justify it.
Jima
enough mergers & acquisitions),
RFC1918 runout becomes a serious, legitimate concern. That's been a big
selling point for me.
Jima
s and TWTC's mutual
customers, and probably a long list of other M&A I'm not thinking of
off-hand.)
OK, I lied about it being great anyway.
Jima
legacy space.
Apparently my data analytics skills are sharp enough to have found those
networks in under 5 minutes. A /16, a /22 (effectively), and two /24s,
right?
I see another /18 got transferred to RIPE the day after yours, so
apparently you're not the only one doing this.
Jima
I don't have any skin in the game, but the following devices popped
into my head while reading that paragraph:
http://www.gogo6.com/gogoware/gogoserver
http://www.gogo6.com/gogoware/gogocpe
Jima
On 2015-07-05 00:13, Mel Beckman wrote:
I predict some enterprising inventor will c
oject, the more expensive it sounds.
Jima
That might be a little more valid once we move past 2000::/3 -- at the
moment, more like IPv4 /29s.
Alas, /48 seems to be the generally accepted maximum prefix length, so,
yeah, this could be unfortunate.
Jima
On 2015-02-19 20:16, manning bill wrote:
and then there are the loons who
width, and look into
point-to-point wireless.
Jima
-inclusive, but I would look at
https://stat.ripe.net/widget/routing-history#w.resource=AS201640 .
Unlike last time, I don't have any contacts at the relevant ISPs. Shame.
Jima
ke a meme out of 64:ff9b::/96?
:-)
Jima
environment.
Jima
but they were about as
plentiful as the supporters.)
So, in theory, the model is great. In practice, it's too soon to tell
-- but only due to layer 8+ problems.
Jima
SF Bay Area.
Don't forget the various SLC suburbs with their sub-$100 1000/1000
FTTH service, and choice of eight layer-3 providers. (Sorry.)
Jima
s:
http://blog.level3.com/global-connectivity/verizons-accidental-mea-culpa/
BRB, I need to make some popcorn.
Jima
o have all but abandoned it.
Dave,
Thank you for clarifying what seemed, at a distance, to be a rather
strange decision. That assessment also explains away some routing
oddities I've observed over the years.
Jima
in:
https://www.peeringdb.com/private/facility_view.php?id=1875
Beyond that, I have no idea -- this is the 350-mile view.
Jima
"only true") IXP in Colorado, so
I'm honestly a bit puzzled as to a) your indignation and b) their decision.
Jima
7;t exist.
Except when, as in the original example, it's not.
Jima
those would be a hard sell for Netflix, no doubt about it.
I guess I'm just glad that my home ISP can justify anteing up for a
pipe to SIX, resources for hosting OpenConnect nodes, and, for that
matter, an ASN. Indeed, not everyone can.
Jima
site already
whether you like it or not.
Diodes
Is it wrong that I read that like this?
http://jima.us/201404/diodes.jpg
(Sorry.)
Jima
meter; no idea what the passive/active breakdown might be (they don't
appear to offer that information as freely). I've mostly used the
3-meter HP DACs so far, and I've been rather happy with them,
particularly the cost savings under 2x 10gbit SFP+ fiber transceivers.
Jima
O
rackmount Gen8.)
Jima
On 2013-08-31 13:38, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
WOL uses 100Mb/s, the phy draws less that way.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 31, 2013, at 10:13, Charles N Wyble
wrote:
On hp proliant gen8 servers with management and ilo on same port, with the
server off the ports show up as 100mb
On 2013-08-15 19:00, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Presumably, everyone else's are very religious as well.
Is anyone here stupid enough not to put the management interfaces behind
a firewall/VPN?
That was my initial thought, too.
Jima
On 2013-07-13 20:15, Jima wrote:
I can happily state that XMission is my home ISP, with UTOPIA
(city-involved fiber optic provider) as the local loop. (Really, who
has 100/100 at home?)
Thanks to everyone who responded -- my list of places I'm willing to
live is roundin
latest patches $network_vendor has sent Pete allows him
to get IPv6 to me, though. :-P
Jima
Esteemed colleagues,
Did anyone else get a Twitter invite from @washsuntimes to their
NANOG-use-only email addresses? Granted, mine was with my old one, but
it was still very much specific to this list. Maybe not the best place
to harvest addresses.
Jima
13-04-03; the
appropriate team was notified, but I guess someone dropped the ball.
Oops.
Jima
On 2013-04-27 11:01, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Apr 26, 2013, at 9:55 PM, Jima wrote:
On 2013-04-26 01:29, Don Gould wrote:
I agree with others that there is still way to much XP and other non
supporting platforms and I suspect that by the time we get those out of
the system we'll be most o
ctly connected to the internet anyway, even with ACLs
-- or so I gleaned from the nice folks from DHS. ;-)
Jima
P for IPv6 -- just enable
the stack. (It's not the greatest implementation, but `ipv6 install` is
still an easier sell than "replace your computer.")
Jima
good luck testing with
nmap (-S and -e are relevant) while running tcpdump (and filtering for
the protocols/ports) on a remote host. I can happily report that
someplace upstream of my home connection is doing some filtering --
nice. I still need to test at work.
Jima
enterprise
network deployment.
Yes and no. OS tuning can be rolled out via AD GPO, or other
configuration management frameworks that might be present for other OSes
(Puppet, CFEngine, etc).
Jima
ve advised.
Jima
On Thu, January 10, 2013 7:53 am, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> As for v6 how popular do you see it getting for mail?
Are you implying that when the internet otherwise moves on to IPv6, we'll
still inexplicably use IPv4 for mail?
Jima
iny of the exit node.
Jima
r) BT, Level 3/Global Crossing, and Verizon in
a number of countries. I suspect any of the three have access in all of
the countries listed. I imagine there are others, but those are the ones
that sprung to mind.
Jima
ther context, but
there's not a sites-online statistic for them.
I suppose it's worth noting that this wouldn't be the first time they've
caught flak for their (in)ability to cover NYC sufficiently.
Jima
facebook.com . I honestly never noticed that they added an
for www.ipv6.facebook.com .
Hardly scientific, but
http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=www.v6.facebook.com&word2=www.ipv6.facebook.com
seems to support my memory to some degree.
Jima
ploy all your internal assets on IPv6 -- thus reducing
the query load AND getting your systems ready for the future.
I'm _this_ close to turning IPv6 off entirely. Anyone want to talk me off this
ledge?
Go right ahead. But first, what company is this, so the rest of us
can know to avoid doing business? ;-)
Jima
Odd wording on the timing; I'm aware of at least one manufactured 1U
system with onboard SFP+ that's been available since Q1-Q2 of this year.
(I don't work for the manufacturer, just for a fairly happy customer.)
Jima
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012, at 7:54am, Drew Weaver wrote:
on't exist.
Jima
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:10pm, Andreas Echavez wrote:
> Mostly backwards compatibility; simplicity. We're planning for some
> super-high-density virtualization/storage projects mixed in with lower
> bandwidth gear, and sticking to one type of cable for eve
cables?
Those seem fairly well supported.
Jima
s
NAT64 instances (64:ff9b::/96 is a blocker if you actually want to allow
NAT64 to RFC1918 space). While I can see the potential appeal of the
second point, I'm not sure I'd agree with it myself.
Jima
han
the nuts-n-bolts side of things. However, if you really want to get
advice about the tech side of it, I'd consider looking for an internship
with an ISP.
Of course, another possible mistake was to assume that the majority of
NANOG members work for ISPs (as such). Other entities operate networks,
y'know.
Jima
> Once upon a time, Jima said:
>> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> > I was at Valley Fair mall the other day. Micr0$0ft is apparently
>> building
>> > a
>> > new store directly across from the Apple store there.
>>
>> It's funn
ross from the Apple store there.
It's funny; they did the exact same thing at Mall of America maybe a year
ago. I guess your report confirms it was a strategy, rather than a
really absurd coincidence.
Jima
since I had two StartSSL certs issued
yesterday afternoon.
Jima
38::/32 (SixXS tunnel)
2001:4978::/32 (SixXS tunnel)
2001:470::/32 (HE tunnel)
That gives me a really bad feeling of what might be wrong, but I'll
leave it to the professionals.
Jima
On 2011-09-05 19:57, Frank Bulk wrote:
Strange, not for me.
nagios:/etc/nagios3# ping6
lted
when UPSes for mission-critical installations need to be spec'd out.
(And by "mission-critical," I'm not talking about datacenters.)
Jima
have BGP or
anything; my DSL provider offered it to me half-jokingly once, but since
the other side (Time Warner Cable) wouldn't to it, I didn't take them up
on it.
Alas, I will maintain that any household that multi-homes at this
stage is, indeed, abnormal.
Jima
P.
AFAIK there's no byte counters or correlation between IPs and the
elements that were fetched from them.
Jima
s for the citation, right. I also probably should also have
cited
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_IPv6_support_in_operating_systems
-- the notable holdouts to RDNSS (that support DHCPv6) seem to be
Windows, Solaris, AIX, and IBM i. Unfortunate.
Jima
else (NTP servers, Domain Controllers,
etc) in DHCP!
Oh, oops; you did touch upon this. You might want to let the people
who've implemented RDNSS in software know that the IETF is working on
it. I'm sure that'll be a relief.
Jima
lesk barely has IPv6 support (>10.2) and I'm yet to hear
about it from CPanel.
FWIW: http://go.cpanel.net/ipv6 -- TL;DR: not there yet.
Jima
ation for 2001::/16 would have to go through their servers. Compare:
0.0.2.in-addr.arpa.
1.0.0.2.in-addr.arpa.
Oops. And yes, I tested this little theory -- it actually applies to
large chunks of 2000::/4.
Jima
the M bit.)
Jima
6 FUD this week.
Jima
those-Supermicro-board's part.
That's not to say there's a route back, by any means.
Jima
geeky plaything. :-(
Jima
some organizations still are).
Jima
soft's behalf. With the money they may be sinking into the
technology, I would contend they have something to lose by not making it
work.
As has been discussed at length on this list, this is NOT an unfixable
issue.
Jima
ument for your point anyway,
since apparently symmetric NAT monkey-wrenches it, too:
http://forums.adobe.com/message/3602495 )
Jima
producing in 2007,
although I don't know if it shipped with an IPv6-capable firmware.)
Even printing isn't the last holdout. :-)
Home entertainment devices, on the other hand... :-(
Jima
, but
I've seen some indications that there may be some inaccuracies
(Allstream announcing 2001:04c8::/33, for instance).
Jima
On 2011-04-26 20:00, Andrew Kirch wrote:
My goal here isn't to bash HE, just to note that I have _REALLY_ bad
routes to it. I had no trouble setting up a tunnel with them.
Have you checked Gogo6 at all?
Jima
thing that ambitious...but I might be wishing for too much.
(Also, that 123 block seems to have been allocated in 2006, so it'd be
even more unprofessional to start projects with that space since then.)
Jima
tural enemies of the Babushka.
Jima
prove
otherwise.
Thank you for your forthright answer. I can't speak for others, but I
appreciate the clarification.
Jima
to do with it.
I guess we can call this a victory for the community? I dunno.
Jima
/24 assuming he has the
correct information for his route objects and visible through the RIR
database.
Some transit providers dislike announcing smaller networks, and thus
have lower limits.
Jima
rds.ieee.org/develop/regauth/oui/oui.txt )
Jima
d need to be laid out and discussed, which
will probably cost us a few years...too bad we don't have a plan that
could be put into action sooner, or maybe even was already deployed.
Anyway, the needless ROT13 text fairly well convinced me that our
messages may be traveling over an ethernet bridge.
Jima
vehicle. What is your next move?
Wait for a winner to prevail. Whoever comes out on top is clearly more
prepared to deal with emergencies.
Jima
year.
I think you owe Mark $10.
Jima
he-internet-has-run-out-of-ip-addresses-and-what-happens-after-that-is-anyones-guess/story-e6frfro0-1225995086627
Of course, you won't find (most of) the inaccuracies there now; they
edited the article after the fact (and after Fox copied them). The only
proof I had for myself reading it l
we're quickly getting to the point where your
average joe IS somewhat likely to have different classes of devices that
might benefit from being on separate subnets.
Jima
e A record (i.e., under
skype.com), and based on a response (if any), replace the known IP value
with the IP which with one wants to connect.
A little weird, but it's a thought.
Jima
p; /48 mindset is flawed, but as a timely
counterpoint to people expounding the virtues of 3177 without cautiously
acknowledging that its recommendations aren't necessarily for everyone.
I apologize if my intentions weren't terribly clear -- that may be a
good cue for me to go to bed.
Jima
ot;Upon entering the PROBE state...")
Pardon me if that's the wrong RFC.
Jima
gning out /48 and /64's. I can sleep at night now! :P
http://tools.ietf.org/html//rfc3177
I can't tell if you're trolling, or if you didn't get the memo from
Monday. I guess I'll lean toward the latter.
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/current/msg06820.html
Jima
r maybe this type of thing isn¹t big of deal... ?
Out of curiosity, have you checked if there's a sticker on the board
with the MAC address(es)? I know a lot of vendors do that.
Jima
's
still IPv4, albeit with NAT.
Jima
ators). I'm pretty happy
with the results, but I'd love to hear if anyone's come up with more
elegant solutions.
Jima
inet is
> all about smaller conductors.
So 208/480 to each cabinet's UPS, and DC from there? I'm not sure how
feasible that is.
Jima
if you're running your AC power through UPSes --
especially online ones (where there's a constant AC-DC-AC conversion
happening). Go to DC for the batteries, never come back. It's a
tempting notion.
Jima
tware) has done a good job of
smarthost-ing mail away from solitary instances with minimal pain; any
reason you couldn't use that?
Jima
ocumentation disagrees.
As does the usage tracking system: http://jima.tk/201012/unlimited.png
Grandfathered-in account, now on a MiFi device.
Jima
94 matches
Mail list logo
