On 06/10/2011 12:32 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
I think it's a fine solution as far as it goes and a good part of a complete 
solution. However,
documenting that a host which sees no RA should attempt DHCPv6 would also be a 
good thing, IMHO. As it currently stands, some hosts which are DHCPv6 capable 
will not attempt to query DHCP until they receive an RA with the M bit set.

If we go down this path, how long before we hear screaming about rogue DHCPv6 servers giving v4-only networks a false v6 path? (At least that could be nullified by adding actual v6 support and an RA without the M bit.)

     Jima

Reply via email to