Re: [Nanog] Re: LISP

2011-04-11 Thread Jason Frisvold
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Apr 11, 2011, at 11:02 AM, harbor235 wrote: > http://www.lisp4.net/ This sounds a lot like LNP in the telco world. Is the goal here to make IP's "portable" ? Or is this a viable way to access IPv6

Re: dns interceptors

2010-02-14 Thread Jason Frisvold
On Feb 14, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > How does that help? It still sends port 53 requests to the authorities, > which will be intercepted. Hrm.. Maybe I misunderstood. Are the packets being intercepted, or is the problem the local resolvers? Well, in either case, another

Re: dns interceptors

2010-02-14 Thread Jason Frisvold
On Feb 13, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > i am often on funky networks in funky places. e.g. the wireless in > changi really sucked friday night. if i ssh tunneled, it would multiply > the suckiness as tcp would have puked at the loss rate. You can always run your own local resolver... O

Re: Telecom Collapse?

2008-12-04 Thread Jason Frisvold
On Dec 4, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Wayne E. Bouchard wrote: That the old ILECs are having problems due to the fact that few if any of them know how to run a decent business is not exactly news. IMO, it might be best if some of them were finaly placed in the position of figuring out how to come into the

Re: hat tip to .gov hostmasters

2008-09-22 Thread Jason Frisvold
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Chris Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chicken, meet egg. > > I think the point of the original post is that one end or the other has to > start things. At least we have one US zone doing something on the server > end of things. Oh, agreed, absolutely. And it's

Re: hat tip to .gov hostmasters

2008-09-22 Thread Jason Frisvold
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Scott Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > nice to see a wholesale DNSSEC rollout underway (I must confess to being a > little surprised at the source, too!). Granted, it's a much more manageable > problem set than, say, .com - but if one US-controlled TLD can do i

Re: Paul Vixie: Re: [dns-operations] DNS issue accidentally leaked?

2008-07-24 Thread Jason Frisvold
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Paul Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > in spite of that caution i am telling you all, patch, and patch now. if you > have firewall or NAT configs that prevent it, then redo your topology -- NOW. > and make sure your NAT isn't derandomizing your port numbers on the