On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Dean Anderson wrote:
> > contains "So Harris banned me from NANOG." . Not sure if thats the
> > meeting, the NANOG list, or one of the NANOG/Merit other lists.
>
> The list, I don't know if this applies to meetings.
The Jan 2000 ban also
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Alan Hannan wrote:
> Is truth an actual defense to your assertions?
Yes. Everything in this message is true, and can be proved to a
certainty.
--Dean
> Dean Anderson wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Scott Doty wrote:
> >
> >
> &
http://www.iadl.org/sorbs/sorbs-story.html
For an account of Mr. Sullivan's assertions that IP blocks used by AV8
Internet are hijacked.
I'm going to put up a page fairly soon about Mr. Vixie's changing
support of SORBS. It seems that many people don't like SORBS, and to
those people, Vixie says
Since you so many facts wrong, a response is necessary.
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> I actually was thinking of the ARIN list that you had the temporary
> ban on :
>
> http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-discuss/2008-February/000897.html
I don't have a page on this be
>> Vixie, Conrad, Manning, Woodcock, Curran, Plzak, Ed Lewis, etc all
>> worked together at ARIN, and have had 22 ARIN employees attend NANOG,
>> including the ARIN executive secretary. ARIN is giving NANOG $50,000
>> checks, even though the Board members have undisclosed conflicts of
>> interest.
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Scott Doty wrote:
> First, the good news: so far, the NANOG conference has been very
> valuable and content-rich, covering a lot of issues that need to be
> discussed. For that, I am grateful.
>
> But now, the bad news(?): Maybe it's just me & my paranoia, but do I
> detec
The size of a mailing list can be judged from its participants over a
long time, and from meeting attendence records.
Every participant in a list eventually sends at least one message to a
mailing list. Those who don't ever send a message are just monitoring
the list; those people aren't partici
7 matches
Mail list logo
