le - it's hard to go back.
If your environment is rapidly growing, stay away from low CAM
limits,anything that's runs in software, (C7200, C7330, J6350), and
make the jump to line-rate hardware devices.
-b
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Chris Enger wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am r
odwin [mailto:na...@studio442.com.au]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 5:09 PM
To: 'nanog@nanog.org'
Cc: Chris Enger
Subject: Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table size
considerations
On 09/03/11 12:08, Julien Goodwin wrote:
> On 09/03/11 11:57, Chris Enger wrote:
>>
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 4:33 PM
To: Chris Enger; 'nanog@nanog.org'
Subject: Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table size
considerations
have you looked into juniper networks?
- Reply message -----
From: "Chris Enger"
Date: Tue, Mar 8,
rrent routing tables,
let alone years of growth. BGP tweaks may keep us going but I can't see how
16k or fewer IPv6 routes on a router is going to be viable a few years from now.
Thank you,
Chris Enger
4 matches
Mail list logo
