On Wed, 26 Jul 2023, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote:
Subject: Re: American Internet Services (AXSCN) outage?
On 7/26/23 2:51 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
Wondering if anyone can shed some light on American Internet Services
going offline.
I saw a short (< 5 minute) blip with them earl
Wondering if anyone can shed some light on American Internet Services going
offline. Their nameservers (ns1/2.axscn.net) aren't even reachable.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
Are you trying to reduce the number of ACL rules that include a known set of
addresses but also minimize covered addresses that are not part of the
mandatory set?
Tony
> On Oct 27, 2019, at 12:29, Joe Maimon wrote:
>
>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 3:09 PM Joe Maimon wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>>
IPv6 connectivity and support.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
email earlier that that does work using a host firewall on an
affected client. For some reason my email is in hold state - not sure
what's up with that.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
ll rule on his Netflix viewer and made the problem
go away.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
Hey!
New message, please read <http://personaldevelopmentblog.co/leaving.php?w5>
Antonio Querubin
---
Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protección de avast!
Antivirus está activa.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
m and xbox.com
live.com has only DNS.
bing.com is a total fail.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
. I don't think your
end-users are gonna be moaning about IPv6 issues when there will likely be
other limitations they'll be cursing about :)
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
ay is more likely with an
ever increasing confidence level of complete runout by Independence Day.
I sense a metaphor in there somewhere :)
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
Trying to gather information on a connectivity issue between TW Telecom
and a specific government web server. If one of your upstream providers
is TW Telecom, could you report back whether you have connectivity to
https://safe.amrdec.army.mil. Thanks.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t
out of trouble has been statistical bandwidth peak usage data.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
Anybody have a good DNS tech contact at FEMA? I tried to report a dnssec
problem to them but apparently the contact listed in whois is out of the
office. In the meantime we have a near hurricane-strength storm
approaching.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Warren Bailey wrote:
There is a group called PTC.. Pacific Telecommunications Council.. That¹s
pretty much the biggest I can think of (lot¹s of MSO¹s.. Operators, etc.)
and it¹s in Hawaii every year.
Actually the conference moves around the Pacific.
Antonio Querubin
e
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
It would be slick if someone could patch mtr to do this too.
It's in mtr as of v0.83.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013, Ray Wong wrote:
even the basic traceroute util with show AS with the -A flag. I actually
can't remember any of the tracing tools which don't support it, offhand.
Indeed - while lft is not IPv6 enabled.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: an
Wondering if anyone else is receiving reports of email to mail.mil
addresses being delayed or refused? The mail.mil mx appear to be
selectively refusing mail.
If anyone has good (non-email) contact info for the mail.mil operators
please send it my way. Thanks.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t
e load balancer does.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, Mukom Akong T. wrote:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
I don't think the business case is the issue. It is the timeline over
which the sense of urgency becomes important enough for most execs to take
seriously. That's still a large unkno
x27;t think the business case is the issue. It is the timeline over
which the sense of urgency becomes important enough for most execs to
take seriously. That's still a large unknown.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
off entirely. Anyone want to talk me
off this ledge? -- http://josephholsten.com
You can stay on the ledge if you like. A lot of folks have already
decided to move on...
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Steve Meuse wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
You mean, like what NDPMon has been delivering for several years already:
Having a choice is never a bad thing(tm).
Indeed! +1
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp
ore direct diagnosis and recommendations
on what needs fixing.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
7;re trying to limit which VLANs are passed.
Also, you may want to try 'general' mode:
switchport mode general
switchport general allowed vlan add xxx,xxx tagged
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
fied VLANs 12 and 22 are actually defined on the Cisco?
vlan database
vlan 12,22
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, David Conrad wrote:
On Jan 31, 2012, at 8:53 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
"We have a contractual relationship with our customer to announce that space. We
have neither a contractual relationship (in this context) with the RIR nor the RIR's
customer. The RIR
ext) with the RIR nor the RIR's
customer. The RIR and/or the RIR's customer should resolve this issue with our
customer."
It as an eye-opening experience.
Contracts are generally not a valid reason to be breaking laws.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
1. No A or record on main worldipv6launch.org
Odd and annoying. So 20th century... :)
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012, Saku Ytti wrote:
This is misguided, IPV6 does no magic to help scale multicast to Internet
scale compared to IPV4.
Actually, IPv6 embedded RP improves scalability over IPv4 MSDP peering and
ASM.
--
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
From what I understand, the answer is likely to be "yes" and the
reason is likely to be "deployed equipment only
supports IGMP v2."
That and numerous clients which don't know anything about SSM.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail:
I suspect would slow IPv6 deployment.
Potential latency issues aside, is there a technical (not political)
reason for doing so?
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
IPv6 geeks have lives too :)
--
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
denying spoofed addresses as an effective intrusion venue for large groups
of viewers listening to a specific SSM source.
Perfect is the enemy of good.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
a DoS possibility with noise traffic
sent to the multicast group.
SSM with encryption?
--
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
there are
active downstream listeners (where "downstream" doesn't mean the same for
unicast as it does multicast).
--
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
who, for
whatever reason, may not be able to get or use native IPv6 for quite some
time.
--
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
ion of the Japanese radioactive plume may
require we revisit this issue in a few years.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org
xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com
verything's cool, you buy new routers on
schedule and the world moves on. The first one however will eventually
kill us.
A valid comparison really needs to use the same vertical scale. That
first is only 2300 new entries in the last 12 months. The other is 35000
new entries in the same peri
uot;fixed". RFC 6109.
^
Maybe you mean RFC 6106?
Antonio Querubin
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
ent a host from just taking or hijacking an IP
address?
Antonio Querubin
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, Santino Codispoti wrote:
What is Teredo Cloud?
One could define this to be just the constellation of Teredo servers,
relays, and clients if you want to make it more concrete.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
ickly. The press conference starts at 10:00.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
quot; if the network operator is providing it via DHCP is it?
Antonio Querubin
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I think having a graph that reached full and stays there will be quite
powerful. :)
Headline material - IPv4 flatlines ... the world as we know it will come
to an end :)
Antonio Querubin
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
ip6tables ships with. You may need to adjust that port
range depending on your apps.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
omers just don't change things that
quickly. And I would think aggregation equipment vendors who have been
eating their own dog food understand that too.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
t who has
TWC Business Class service about 2 weeks ago, the response I received was
"it's not available yet... you need to convert to IPv4..."
Are Business Class customers considered residential or commercial?
Antonio Querubin
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
look like with 10+
devices in peoples homes in those /64:s, each perhaps using multiple IPs.
Your ND traffic will be enormous.
I wonder how many ISPs actually have so many IPv6 customers that they
actually have these problems. Or is this mainly a limitation with a
particular vendor's equip
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Owen DeLong wrote:
If they're routing a /64 to your gateway, you're all set. If they're not,
then, how are you getting the /64 in the first place?
Bridged ethernet across the broadband provider network to the ISP router.
Each customer gets a single /64 vlan to their resid
ing to add
routes to your gateway.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
be more clearly documented.
Years later, the documentation is still lacking.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
f you need multiple subnets and you have to
provide further justification to get a /48.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
-state NEW //
s/224.0.0.251/ff02::fb/
s/icmp-host-prohibited/icmp6-adm-prohibited/
Modify as needed. YMMV.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
on of
the docs. Their non-RFC-compliant behaviour is a hidden land mine.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
e SSL-enabled sites. Otherwise the generic
name-based Apache config should work fine for just about everything else.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Antonio Querubin wrote:
Best to remove IP version dependencies in your configs.
If you are using name-based virtual hosting in Apache, convert:
Listen a.b.c.d:80 -> Listen 80
->
Use hard-coded IP addresses only where required for stuff like SSL-e
X hostnames have AAAA RRs.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
On Dec 2, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
The various IPv6 wikis could use a good sprinkling of multicast howtos.
True. Want to help with that ?
Working on it...
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
akers as one of three types of
GFCI devices.
Yep I just did the same check. I think the delisting may have applied to
specific models from specific manufacturers. I just don't see UL
delisting all GFCI breakers.
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
d use a good sprinkling of multicast howtos.
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
s.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-10
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
ire hazard.)
You sure about that? GFCI breakers as well as their close cousins AFCIs
are still being sold and bought at hardware stores.
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
onary
satellites. All someone has to do (actually it would make more sense if
NOAA/NWS did this themselves and bypass the satellites) is to gateway that
stuff onto the Internet MBONE. NOAAPORT already has globally-assigned
multicast addresses and port numbers reserved for it.
Antonio Querubin
808-545
220,000 seat multicast video network)
Which points to the need for service providers to deploy robust multicast
routing.
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Oh: and all the extra servers and switches necessary to set that up?
*Way* more power than the equivalent transmitters and TV sets. Even if
you add in the cable headends, I suspect.
Have you heard of multicast? :)
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282
::/32 for AT&T worldservices,
In whois they're really a /29 but nothing prevents them from advertising
individual /32 at different points around the net.
http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET6-2001-1890-1
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
I'm seeing DNS lookup failures for us.af.mil, usmc.mil, us.army.mil, and
navy.mil. Possibly more .mil are affected. This is getting way too
frequent. Anybody got a good out-of-band (not .mil) contact for reporting
this?
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
thout going to an RIR and
paying a fee?
Legacy ASN assignment?
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
Anyone else having trouble resolving .mil hostnames today?
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010, Leen Besselink wrote:
On 09/12/2010 08:42 AM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Jared Mauch wrote:
I would be careful actually using teredo, as some of them (eg:
Microsoft) have swaths of native IPv6 networks that are unreachable.
While I would agree in
y-specific problem which may not be under
Microsoft control at all. All the more reason for ISPs to run their own
local Teredo relay.
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
ckage.
You can get an idea of where some public relays might be at:
http://www.bgpmon.net/teredo.php
But there may be a bunch of others not listed. The relay used varies on a
per-connection basis. It'll generally be the closest relay to the
non-teredo host.
Antonio Querubin
808-545-52
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
Maybe they are having issues with their multicast mail routing protocol.
Looks like their mmrpf (multicast mail reply path forwarding) is broken ;)
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Murphy, Jay, DOH wrote:
Traffic shaping produces a queue, and does not completely junk a packet.
It becomes q'd, and produces a smoother output.
Traffic-shaping 80Mb/s of traffic is probably not a good idea for your
router cpu :)
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Alan Bryant wrote:
The problem we have now is that we are only paying for 80 MB/s of the
OC-3, and the ISP is leaving the capping of it up to us. I have
BTW, rate-limiting of traffic that the ISP router sends to your router is
best done at the ISP router.
Antonio
es of:
rate-limit input 8000 1500 1500 conform-action transmit
exceed-action drop
rate-limit output 8000 1500 1500 conform-action transmit
exceed-action drop
on your OC3 interface.
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
NANOG list mail server is IPv6-enabled. Your above message came into
our mail server over IPv6. So by just using this list you'll be testing
your mailserver over IPv6.
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
Anyone seeing trouble resolving some .mil hostnames consistently today?
Specifically those below:
www.dco.dod.mil
www.my.af.mil
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
is an adequate level of effort. And we're
mot running out of public IPv4 addresses anytime soon for the blossoming
dialup business ;).
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
On Mon, 10 May 2010, Chris Adams wrote:
How are ISPs that still offer dialup going to handle dialup and IPv6? I
know the TNTs don't do it, and I don't think most of the old equipment
in use in many places does.
6to4
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
il to hostmas...@ep.net to have a delegation
updated, but got a bounce...
I wonder if DNS for GLOP/RFC3180 is still expected to work/be supported,
or should I just give up :)
I think this has been broken for a while now. But if you ever figure out
who can delegate the zones let me know :)
An
, you now become responsible for the reverse-lookups for that
allocated address range.
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Mark Keymer wrote:
I guess I am confused. Don't you have to pay for IP4 space? I know I am still
fairly new to things. So maybe I just don't get it.
Legacy IPv4 holders have no obligation to ARIN until they sign an RSA.
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mai
s actually
approved by ARIN. However, fighting for a line in the budget for the
unexpected fee(s) and the prospect of having to push the RSA through state
government lawyers was enough to dissuade them that IPv6 just wasn't
important enough at this time.
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3
s to say, their IPv6 plans
are on hold indefinitely.
Those with legacy IP4 space should have the equivalent IP6 space under
the same terms. Or am I missing something?
But they're not exactly the same terms. ARIN 'terms' for the legacy
holder probably didn't exist at the
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Joe Greco wrote:
Someone suggested this be posted more visibly.
Sooo, uh, timely :)
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Greg Whynott wrote:
We use confidence inspiring names here for our devices, shakey, broken,
jitter, crusty
Ah, try endangered plants/animals :)
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
be generally accepted as the the longest
prefix allowed through filters (although /49 through /54 are also
discussed). Most customers, however, won't be multi-homed.
https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#six541
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/E9-28931.htm
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
only issue they should be looking at. If
the government really wants to make significant, long-term improvements to
the national network infrastructure, it also needs to be encouraging
deployment of multicast and IPv6 to the end-user.
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
f the content server is IPv6
enabled.
Broadbandreports.com's tool reportedly works over IPv6 if you enable Java
to use IPv6 and the content server is IPv6 enabled.
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
hard would it
be to start allowing /25s when compared to trying to roll out IP6?
I think these qualify to be in an IPv6 FAQ if they're not already :)
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Sean Donelan wrote:
Are there any common locations in Alaska where multiple local ISPs exchange
traffic, either transit or peering? Or is Seattle the closest exchange point
for Alaska ISPs?
peeringdb.com lists only SIX (in Seattle) and PAIX Seattle.
Antonio Querubin
808
DISA and DoD would argue about that claim with regard to NIPRNet
and SIPRNet :)
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Kauto Huopio wrote:
On 2/27/10 8:08 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
Tsunami evacuation zone areas are being advised to evacuate. But of
course the online maps are actually offline today for some reason.
I'd guess HI civil defence would not mind some quick assistance
maps are actually offline today for some reason.
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
than telephone country codes tied to a national carrier network.
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
gs):
http://www.itu.int/net/ITU-T/ipv6/itudocs.aspx
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
)
Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
