Hi,
On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 at 03:17, james jones wrote:
>
> just quick question:
>
> is the abuse emails still best way to report domains that are being used in
> malware scripts? or is there a more central place to report such things?
This may be more from a sysadmin perspective than network ope
On Sun, 10 Jun 2018 at 21:50, Mike Lyon wrote:
>
> Title says it all... Currently using IPPlan, but it is kinda antiquated..
I am told by someone who has used it that Diamond IP is fantastic
(https://www.globalservices.bt.com/btfederal/en/products/diamondip).
But good luck getting your jaw off t
Hi,
On 29 August 2016 at 16:55, Jason Lee wrote:
> NANOG Community,
>
> I was curious how various players in this industry handle abuse complaints.
> I'm drafting a policy for the service provider I'm working for about
> handing of complaints registered against customer IP space. In this example
Hi,
On 2 February 2016 at 15:47, Colton Conor wrote:
> I would honestly perfer something that was hardened for outdoor use. Think
> garden style apartments. What is the best for something like that?
It depends where you are going to be deploying these things, northern
New York state? Arizona
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 1:56 AM, John Levine wrote:
> In article <37dba43e-ee76-4323-962c-30bb988d0...@hathcock.org> you write:
>>Greetings, NANOG. Happy Saturday to all.
>>
>>I am running a DOCSIS network that has a noisy cable plant. I want to be
>>able to substantiate and quantify users'
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, James Downs wrote:
>
>>
>> > On Aug 11, 2015, at 06:01, Rafael Possamai wrote:
>>
>> > style as nanog and registered the nadcog.org domain.
>>
>> Nad Cog?
>
>
> datacenterops.org is still available *hint*hint*
>
>
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Nick Olsen wrote:
>
> Anyone anxious to see what kind of traffic comes from Windows 10 releasing
> tomorrow?
>
> Being a 3-4GB download. Each device is moving more data than any Apple
> update ever did.
>
> Wonder if they'll stage the release as apple appear
Hi,
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Markus wrote:
> Did you know that anyone, anywhere in the world can get into a gmail account
> merely by knowing its creation date (month and year is sufficient) and the
> last login date (try "today")? What a joke.
Can you not set account recory options whic
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Seiichi Kawamura wrote:
> Not my list, but here's one.
> http://www.bugest.net/nogs.html
>
> I'm sure there's more though. BDNOG, BTNOG, HKNOG ...
>
As has been mentioned, there are also a few special purpose
non-geographic lists around. Voiceops for VoIP
(http:/
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Joel Maslak wrote:
> You might look at your local community college's offerings. Probably
> better bang for the buck than many other offerings.
>
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Colton Conor
> wrote:
>
>> We have a couple of techs that want to learn cisco
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette
> wrote:
>>
>> After a careful investigation, I am of the opinion that each of the
>> following 18 ASNs was registered (via RIPE) with fradulent information
>> purporting to re
Hello all,
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I could be wrong, but I'm guessing that there's no legitimate circumstance
> for mem...@linkedin.com
> to be sending to nanog@nanog.org.
>
> Couldn't the list be taught to filter these?
>
> Owen
>
Since this seems to be causing eve
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:28 PM, J. Oquendo wrote:
>
>
> Yes, semi off/on topic I am aware, but because there are
> many here who visit the site, figured I'd ask. Anyone else
> having certificate issues on Juniper.net && their support
> login? This just started today.
>
> www.juniper.net is pu
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Jeff Kell wrote:
> Looking for some guidance/references on the use of UPC versus APC
> terminations on fiber
> cabling.
Something similar has recently been discussed on NANOG. It might be worth
having a look though that discussion as well if you want more
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Carlos M. Perez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're trying to resolve some delivery issues reported by hotmail users.
> Started happening a few weeks ago.
> ===
> Reporting-MTA: dns;snt0-omc3-s27.snt0.hotmail.com
> Received-From-MTA: dns;SNT133-W53
> Arrival-Date: Mon
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> On 2012-09-27 11:23 , Eugen Leitl wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to figure out whether CERNET
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CERNET
> > is part of the official Internet,
>
> There is no 'official Internet', there is a 'view on the Internet'
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Paul Thornton wrote:
> On 18/09/2012 15:07, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> http://paritynews.com/network/item/325-department-of-work-and-pensions-uk-in-possession-of-169-million-unused-ipv4-addresses
>>
>> Department of Work and Pensions UK in Possession of 16.9 Mi
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Paul Thornton wrote:
>
> On 18/09/2012 15:07, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> http://paritynews.com/network/item/325-department-of-work-and-pensions-uk-in-possession-of-169-million-unused-ipv4-addresses
>>
>> Department of Work and Pensions UK in Possession of 16.9
Hello,
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
>
> I have been aggressively looking for deals in servers in Europe for
> anycasting.
If you're looking for stuff in "Europe" (I'm assuming Western European
EU member states, rather than states bordering Russia or th
Hi,
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Thames wrote:
> I would like to get some input for the following problem we face with YouTube
> video streaming.
> We are an ISP in Singapore and peer with Google at Equinix and SOX (Singapore
> Open Exchange), For about 2 weeks we have been facing choppy st
Hello,
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Mike wrote:
>
> I have a security incident to report and need to make contact with a
> senior level contact responsible for spamcop/ironport immediately.
>
Although I'm pretty sure the OP will have got in touch with someone by
now, for reference for
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Alec Muffett wrote:
>
>
> On 1 Apr 2012, at 15:30, Justin Wilson wrote:
> > I hate April 1 on the Web. You are right you never can tell. I
> > would be
> > appalled if someone as respectable as the BBC stoops to downright dumb
> > pranks.
>
> It is true.
>
>
Hello,
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
>
>
>
> Does anyone have any recommendation for a reliable cloud host?
>
> We require 1 or 2 very small virtual hosts to host some remote services to
> serve as backup to our main datacenter. One of these services is a DNS
> server
Hello,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:36 PM, James Braunegg
wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> Just posting to see if anyone has seen any strange outbound traffic on port
> 3389 from Microsoft Windows Server over the last few hours.
>
> We witnessed an alarming amount of completely independent Microsoft Window
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Keith Medcalf wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> () ascii ribbon campaign against html e-mail
> /\ www.asciiribbon.org
>
>
> > On Thursday, 05 January, 2012 08:30, Marshall Eubanks said:
>
> > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Keith Medcalf wrote:
>
> > > > There is video
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Octavio Alvarez
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 01:18:40 -0800, jacob miller wrote:
>
>> Am having a debate on the results of speed tests sites.
>>
>> Am interested in knowing the thoughts of different individuals in regards to
>> this.
>
>
> They are just
Howdy,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>
> On Oct 13, 2011, at 7:26 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> > On 10/13/11 3:30 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> >> In fact, Skype, just as a for instance, is worse on hotel wifi as
> >> launching the app on a laptop makes you a middl
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:19 PM, foks wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Since Sep 7 Google has bounced a specific type of our mails with this
> message:
>
> host aspmx.l.google.com[74.125.43.27] said: 552-5.7.0 Our system
> detected an illegal attachment on your message. Please 552-5.7.0 visit
> http://mail.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 2:55 PM, andrew.wallace
wrote:
>
> I'm hearing on the news wire 80mph winds will come to UK over the next 72
> hours.
>
Anyone worried about major weather events in the UK is probably best
either checking or subscribing to the Met Office's weather warnings at
http://www.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Mark Keymer wrote:
> I am wondering what some of you guys do when your home ISP is down. At
> least those of you that don't give yourself internet.
>
>
Ooh, heck. I'm going through this at the moment. I noticed a website that
doesn't load some of the time. Afte
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Chris wrote:
> http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=233447973367229
>
> I have been getting people to click "Report Event" at the bottom and
> had the website in "step 5" shutdown so much that they flocked to
> Blogspot. Does anyone have an idea who the advertise
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Nick Feamster wrote:
>
> Hello NANOG,
>
> We've launched Project BISMark, a project that performs active performance
> measurements of upload and download throughput, latency, etc. from
> OpenWRT-based routers running inside of homes. We have tested our
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> another view might be that netflix's customers are eating the bandwidth
>
> randy
>
One of the UKs large residential ISPs publishes what their customers
use bandwidth for at
http://www.talktalkmembers.com/content/view/154/159/
"Streaming prot
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Chris wrote:
> Does anyone have a better abuse contact for GoDaddy? I'm trying to get
> one of those "paste Javascript in your browser address bar" scams on
> Facebook shutdown before too many idiots fall for it.
The only way I've ever got a response from them is
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Tom Hill wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 07:59 -0500, Kornelijus Survila wrote:
>> Snort (http://www.snort.org/) is also a nice IDS. They provide paid
>> and free rules/signatures.
>
> And if you would like 64bit and/or IPv6 support, try Suricata:
>
> http://www.ope
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Santino Codispoti
wrote:
> I know a few years ago some Vo/IP peering points where started. Are
> they still around today? I am looking for a solution to hand-off
> outbound voice calls to mobile operators
While not specifically answering your question, as this
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
> What is the DKIM check result for those messages?
Non existent, it's SPF only.
This is what GMail sees:
Received: from s0.nanog.org (s0.nanog.org [207.75.116.162])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h1si7255610ibn.43.2011.04.22.13.42.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:14 PM, harbor235 wrote:
> If I were going to provide a 365x24x7 NOC, how many teams of personnel do I
> need
> to fully cover operations? I assume minimally you need 3 teams to cover the
> required
> 24 hr coverage, but there is off time and schedule rotation?
Well, if y
38 matches
Mail list logo
