- Original Message -
> From: "Sean Donelan"
> NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT RAIL CONTROL CENTER POWER
> OUTAGE ISSUE ON AUGUST 29, 2021
> Key Findings
> September 8, 2021
>
> https://www.governor.ny.gov/sites/default/files/2021-09/WSP_Key_Findings_Summary-for_release.pdf
>
> Key Findings
> [...
Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways...
> On Sep 8, 2021, at 1:31 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> If the mid size eyeballs knew ipv4 is going away in 10, 15, 20 years
> whichever it is, then they'd of course have to start moving too,
> because no upstream.
And they would fight
> On Sep 8, 2021, at 1:26 AM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>
>
> I started wondering if there are areas where we can disable IPv4 today.
There are places in which it is disabled today, for at least some services.
Dear colleagues,
Anyone from Cox on here that can deal with the ongoing hijack of 92.50.32.0/21
and 92.50.56.0/21 by AS22773?
Alternatively, any contact information of someone who can do so would be much
appreciated, thanks!
PS. Please CC me on reply. I am subscribed, but currently stuck w/
Indeed. They would send postcards to all their customers saying
"Comcast has said they will cut off your access to Netflix on April 1,
Call their president's office at 1-800-xxx- and tell them what you think."
Nope… Netflix is fully available on IPv6 and actually looks forward to ISPs
doing
Yes, I own my own modem even though comcast now charges me $5/month more than
if I rented their equipment for this privilege.
Owen
> On Sep 10, 2021, at 15:49 , Eric Kuhnke wrote:
>
> Ideally being your own customer owned cable modem that meets specs (Comcast
> does allow this in some region
> On Sep 10, 2021, at 14:17 , Jeroen Massar wrote:
>
> On 2021-09-10 18:27, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>> On Sep 10, 2021, at 01:39 , Jeroen Massar wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On 20210909, at 21:55, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
> [..]
> Awful lot of red spots even in the top 100. Hell, even
> On Sep 10, 2021, at 13:22 , John Levine wrote:
>
> It appears that Owen DeLong via NANOG said:
>> This is my point… That is why I think an announcement of “On X date,
>> we will begin charging extra for IPv4 services and define Internet Access
>> to be IPv6” by a couple of the larger eyebal
That’s probably not the full extent of it, but yes, that looks like a good
starting point.
On closer look, the fact that he’s looking for something to abstract their
provisioning APIs rather than an
interconnected for them at the call switching level, Asterisk probably doesn’t
address the probl
Which that link would be stale, as Asterisk now defaults to PJ_SIP, which works
differently. ;-)
Some or all of the below functionality:
1. Create\delete PBXes, SIP bindings, etc. as appropriate for new customers on
Metaswitch.
2. Order new DID, place new port, etc. from Peerless.
3. Place
On 9/11/21 8:36 AM, David Bass wrote:
When can we reclaim all this unused space from the US DoD? Serious
question.
I’ve never understood how they can just sit on this without having to do
something with it.
Remember, just because a prefix isn't in your routing table doesn't mean
the addr
On 11 Sep 2021, at 7:36 AM, David Bass wrote:
>
> When can we reclaim all this unused space from the US DoD? Serious question.
>
> I’ve never understood how they can just sit on this without having to do
> something with it.
In 2007, the US DoD was asked the question of possible return of
When can we reclaim all this unused space from the US DoD? Serious
question.
I’ve never understood how they can just sit on this without having to do
something with it.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 8:34 PM Paul Ferguson
wrote:
> Both articles are base don Doug Madory's research:
>
> https://www.ken
13 matches
Mail list logo
