Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways... > On Sep 8, 2021, at 1:31 AM, Saku Ytti <s...@ytti.fi> wrote: > > If the mid size eyeballs knew ipv4 is going away in 10, 15, 20 years > whichever it is, then they'd of course have to start moving too, > because no upstream. And they would fight it tooth and nail, just like they do now, and if they found an address they could NAT to, they would argue that that one address gave them the ability to avoid the transition -just like they do now.
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Jeroen Massar via NANOG
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Jeroen Massar via NANOG
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Levine
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John R. Levine
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Fred Baker
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Brian Johnson
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Nick Hilliard