Mehmet Akcin wrote:
I am kind of curious of the ICANN/IANA position on this?
https://afrinic.net/history
In April 2005, ICANN accredited AFRINIC as the fifth Regional
Internet Registry according to criteria defined in its ICP-2
document (criteria for the establishment of regional Internet
regi
I am kind of curious of the ICANN/IANA position on this?
On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 13:32 Masataka Ohta <
mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote:
> Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> >> Then, several years will be lost if we wait Mauritius court
> >> settle the issue.
> >>
> >> A quick fix for the internationa
On 8/27/21 09:18, Aaron Wendel wrote:
I suppose people who wanted to take a side could also block traffic to
and from Cloud Innovations IP blocks.
All it would take is for one 800-pound gorilla to do so. Cloud
Innovations would implode should Google, Microsoft, or Amazon drop all
traffic from
On 27/08/2021 18:36, Bill Woodcock wrote:
As many of you are aware, AfriNIC is under legal attack by Heng Lu / “Cloud
Innovation.”
John Curran just posted an excellent summary of the current state of affairs
here:
https://teamarin.net/2021/08/27/afrinic-and-the-stability-of-the-internet-
Owen DeLong wrote:
Then, several years will be lost if we wait Mauritius court
settle the issue.
A quick fix for the international internet community can be to
abandon AfriNIC and establish, outside of Mauritius, a new entity,
which may employ current AfriNIC employers, recognized by the intern
> On Aug 28, 2021, at 10:02 , Masataka Ohta
> wrote:
>
> John Curran wrote:
>
>> Indeterminate at this time, since a “Freezing Order" issued via ex
>> party hearing doesn’t actually test the strength of the arguments, as
>> the affected party is not present to respond. It is only when the
>
>
> Maybe some will, but they'd be better off selling them before the RIRs
> decide to expand their scope and start mass reclaiming for profit.
>
I'm sorry, what?
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 9:36 PM Laszlo Hanyecz wrote:
>
> On 2021-08-28 00:58, Tom Beecher wrote:
>
> Fundamentally I think everyone
John Curran wrote:
Indeterminate at this time, since a “Freezing Order" issued via ex
party hearing doesn’t actually test the strength of the arguments, as
the affected party is not present to respond. It is only when the
case for the validation of the order is heard that the strength of
the ar
8 matches
Mail list logo
