Re: Suspicious IP reporting

2021-02-04 Thread Dave Phelps
While I agree that reporting something not observed just creates a lot of unnecessary work for the recipient in processing all of the unsubstantiated reports (that don't match traffic logs, etc), that isn't the point of my message. I would point out that most people would call such reports spam at

Re: Amsterdam Dark Fiber

2021-02-04 Thread Sabri Berisha
Hi, Back in the day when I still lived there, Level 3 was also known to have fiber in the area. Depending on your needs, Equinix offers dark fiber between (some of) their locations, and Relined(.eu) has a nationwide fiber network. You can also check out irc, irc.nlnog.net, #nlnog, or subscrib

Re: Suspicious IP reporting

2021-02-04 Thread JoeSox
Ryan, Thanks but like I said these devices are in moving vehicles ok? I stated we have a plan but it is ways out. FACT: we have a known malicious C&C FACT: We know what networks it is hitting and the cellular network is the most vulnerable, imo. FACT: this IP is against Verizon terms of service so

RE: Suspicious IP reporting

2021-02-04 Thread Ryan Hamel
Joe, It isn’t on Verizon to setup a firewall, especially if you have a direct public IP service. The device being attached directly to the Internet (no matter the transmission medium), must be able to protect itself. ISPs provide routers which function as a NAT/Firewall appliance, to provide

Amsterdam Dark Fiber

2021-02-04 Thread Rod Beck
Please contact offlist. Looking for dark fiber in Amsterdam. Eurofiber has traditionally dominated this market. Who else competes in this market? Roderick Beck VP of Business Development United Cable Company www.unitedcablecompany.com New York City & Budap

Re: Suspicious IP reporting

2021-02-04 Thread JoeSox
How do I setup a firewall when I am not a Verizon engineer? There is a firewall via the antivirus and operating system but that's it. Do you not understand my issue? I thought that is the real problem with the online bullies in this thread. -- Thank You, Joe On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 5:01 PM Ryan Ha

RE: Suspicious IP reporting

2021-02-04 Thread Ryan Hamel
Joe, The underlying premise here is, “pick your battles”. If you don’t want an IP address to access your device in anyway, setup a firewall and properly configure it to accept whitelisted traffic only, or just expose a VPN endpoint. The Internet is full of both good and bad actors that probe

Re: Suspicious IP reporting

2021-02-04 Thread JoeSox
Do others see this online bully started by Tom? The leader has spoken so the minions follow :) This list sometimes LOL I think if everyone gets off their high horse, the list communication would be less noisy for the list veterans. -- Thank You, Joe On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 4:36 PM TJ Trout wrote

Re: Suspicious IP reporting

2021-02-04 Thread TJ Trout
This seems like a highly suspect request coming from a North American network operator...? On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:23 AM JoeSox wrote: > > This IP is hitting devices on cellular networks for the past day or so. > https://www.abuseipdb.com/whois/79.124.62.86 > I think this is the info to rep

Re: Suspicious IP reporting

2021-02-04 Thread JoeSox
Jean, That is fine. I don't understand why the ignorance. Its one flipping email and people can reply to me without adding the list. Is this really a necessary conversation? It has only blown up BECAUSE of Tom's comments. That is great he is a big shot and contributes, that is great to hear. I am n

RE: Suspicious IP reporting

2021-02-04 Thread Jean St-Laurent via NANOG
I do not know Tom personally, but I’ve been following his comments, hindsight and shared experience. Tom seems to be a bigger player than you on this mailing list. Joe, you are only penalizing yourself by banning him. I would personally not ban him. J From: Jean St-Laurent Sent: Fe

RE: Suspicious IP reporting

2021-02-04 Thread Jean St-Laurent via NANOG
So what? I’ve scanned the internet more than 100’ times on all ports/protocols than you can imagine with zmap and many other shabby tools. I agree with Tom that these absue reports are totally useless and create so much noise that it feels like crying wolf. Network operator are trained to ab

Re: Suspicious IP reporting

2021-02-04 Thread JoeSox
Tom, Others are seeing it as I provided the website that shows others are seeing it. https://www.abuseipdb.com/check/79.124.62.86 I think it is pretty poor form to be ignorant. Congrats you have been banned from my gmail account straight to the deleted. On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 1:12 PM Tom Beeche

Re: Suspicious IP reporting

2021-02-04 Thread Tom Beecher
I think it's pretty poor form to ask people to report an IP for doing something they are not seeing themselves, and may not even be abuse. What does "hitting devices" mean? Pings? SNMP? This sort of thing contributes to abuse reponses being poor; lots of noise, not much signal. On Thu, Feb 4, 202

Suspicious IP reporting

2021-02-04 Thread JoeSox
This IP is hitting devices on cellular networks for the past day or so. https://www.abuseipdb.com/whois/79.124.62.86 I think this is the info to report it to the ISP. Any help or if everyone can report it, I would be a happy camper. ab...@4cloud.mobi; ab...@fiberinternet.bg https://en.asytech.

Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 157, Issue 3

2021-02-04 Thread Rod Beck
It sounds interesting. -R. From: NANOG on behalf of Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 6:00 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: NANOG Digest, Vol 157, Issue 3 I couldn't put down Bill Norton's book. https://drpeering.net/core/book