Re: Virginia voter registration down due to cable cut

2020-10-15 Thread Sean Donelan
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020, Valdis Klētnieks wrote: my reaction was more like Surprise, surprise, surprise... S.N.A.F.U. Other SNAFUs, Georgia had technical problems with its voter database systems during the first couple of days of early voting. Expect all sorts of minor problems throughout the

RFC 2468

2020-10-15 Thread Rodney Joffe
It is especially fitting whenever the NANOG/ARIN joint meetings occur in the same week that we “remember IANA”. As time has gone on, fewer and fewer of us actually know who J. Postel is - that name that appears at the end of so many RFC’s we refer to every day. The same person who also guided t

Re: Cogent Layer 2

2020-10-15 Thread Brandon Martin
On 10/15/20 6:15 PM, Robert Blayzor wrote: On 10/14/20 1:56 PM, Shawn L via NANOG wrote: When I last spoke to them, it sounded like they were using a bunch of LAG groups based on ip address because they _really_ wanted to know how many ip addresses we had and what kind of traffic we would be exp

Cox contact?

2020-10-15 Thread Fred Baker
Would an engineer from Cox please contact me privately?

Re: Cogent Layer 2

2020-10-15 Thread Robert Blayzor
On 10/14/20 1:56 PM, Shawn L via NANOG wrote: > When I last spoke to them, it sounded like they were using a bunch of > LAG groups based on ip address because they _really_ wanted to know how > many ip addresses we had and what kind of traffic we would be expecting > (eyeball networks, big data tra

Re: Residential GPON last mile for network engineers (Telus AS852 and others)

2020-10-15 Thread Paul Nash
I have a Bell Canada gig fibre connection. My first attempt was to bridge their all-in-one box (disaster, unreliable as all hell), second was to set a bunch of rules for inbound traffic. Apart from inbound access being *very* iffy, their device was s_l_o_w. So I pulled the fibre GBIC, used a

RE: Ingress filtering on transits, peers, and IX ports

2020-10-15 Thread adamv0025
> Chris Adams > Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 3:59 PM > > Once upon a time, adamv0...@netconsultings.com > said: > > Actually ideally there would be a feature/knob to automatically sync BGP > (and static routes) with packet filters. > > Junos has prefix-lists that can be referenced in both BG

Shopify Network Admin ?

2020-10-15 Thread John Rees
Hi Nanog, I am troubleshooting an issue where it appears that users orginitating from a certain subnet that I manage are unable to access websites hosted by Shopify. We have contacted Shopify support and are still waiting for resolution. If anybody here is from Shopify - I would like to get some

Looking for a contact at Twitter

2020-10-15 Thread Ariën Vijn via NANOG
Greetings, I am looking for somebody working for Twitter. I am working for a small ISP in the Netherlands (AS 206238). Our problem is that Twitter's geolocation database still situates some our IPv4 blocks in the United Arab Emirates. This renders Twitter unusable for some of our customers. W

Re: Ingress filtering on transits, peers, and IX ports

2020-10-15 Thread Blake Hudson
Speaking as an ISP:     Most of the ISP networks I manage are multi-homed, and I don't think uRPF provides the knobs to ensure legitimate traffic doesn't get dropped in some cases, so we use static ACLs at the upstream edge on ingress (and egress). These need updated any time new IP space is ad

Re: Cogent Layer 2

2020-10-15 Thread Saku Ytti
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 17:49, Ryan Hamel wrote: > > So you're dropping in every edge all UDP packets towards these three ports? > > Your customers may not appreciate. > You must not be familiar with JUNOS' ACL handling. This would be applied to > interface lo0, which is specifically for control

Re: Ingress filtering on transits, peers, and IX ports

2020-10-15 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, adamv0...@netconsultings.com said: > Actually ideally there would be a feature/knob to automatically sync BGP (and > static routes) with packet filters. Junos has prefix-lists that can be referenced in both BGP policy and firewall statements. -- Chris Adams

Re: Cogent Layer 2

2020-10-15 Thread Ryan Hamel
> Do you want your martini emulated backbone link to fail when operator > reroutes their own LSR-LSR link failure? As I said, it's an acceptable loss for my employers network, as we have a BGP failover mechanism in place that works perfectly. > So you're dropping in every edge all UDP packets to

Re: Ingress filtering on transits, peers, and IX ports

2020-10-15 Thread Tim Durack
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 10:30 AM Saku Ytti wrote: > On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 17:22, Tim Durack wrote: > > > > We deploy urpf strict on all customer end-host and broadband circuits. > In this scenario urpf = ingress acl I don't have to think about. > > But you have to think about what prefixes a cu

RE: Ingress filtering on transits, peers, and IX ports

2020-10-15 Thread adamv0025
> From: Saku Ytti > Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 3:30 PM > > On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 17:22, Tim Durack wrote: > > > > We deploy urpf strict on all customer end-host and broadband circuits. In > this scenario urpf = ingress acl I don't have to think about. > > But you have to think about wh

Re: Ingress filtering on transits, peers, and IX ports

2020-10-15 Thread Nick Hilliard
Saku Ytti wrote on 15/10/2020 15:29: But you have to think about what prefixes a customer has. If BGP you need to generate prefix-list, if static you need to generate a static route. As you already have to know and manage this information, what is the incremental cost to also emit an ACL? the u

Re: Ingress filtering on transits, peers, and IX ports

2020-10-15 Thread Saku Ytti
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 17:22, Tim Durack wrote: > We deploy urpf strict on all customer end-host and broadband circuits. In > this scenario urpf = ingress acl I don't have to think about. But you have to think about what prefixes a customer has. If BGP you need to generate prefix-list, if stat

Re: Ingress filtering on transits, peers, and IX ports

2020-10-15 Thread Tim Durack
We deploy urpf strict on all customer end-host and broadband circuits. In this scenario urpf = ingress acl I don't have to think about. We deploy urpf loose on all customer multihomed DIA circuits. I dont this makes sense - ingress packet acl would be more sane. Any flavour of urpf on upstream tr

Re: Ingress filtering on transits, peers, and IX ports

2020-10-15 Thread Saku Ytti
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 15:14, wrote: > Yes one should absolutely do that, but... > But considering to become a good netizen what is more work? > a) Testing and the enabling uRPF on every customer facing box or setting up > precise ACLs on every customer facing port, and then maintaining all tha

RE: Ingress filtering on transits, peers, and IX ports

2020-10-15 Thread adamv0025
> From: Saku Ytti > Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 11:12 AM > > Hey, > Hey Saku, > > All stub autonomous systems should have a simple egress ACL allowing > only PI of their customers and their own PAs -it’s a simple ACL at each > AS-Exit > points (towards transits/peers), that’s it. > > > >

RE: Ingress filtering on transits, peers, and IX ports

2020-10-15 Thread Jean St-Laurent via NANOG
Hi Brian, "However, I recognized a SP-specific case where we could receive legitimate traffic sourcing from our own IP blocks: customers running multi-homed BGP where we have assigned PA space to them. So I added "permit" statements for traffic sourcing from these blocks." If your customers a

Re: Ingress filtering on transits, peers, and IX ports

2020-10-15 Thread Baldur Norddahl
This is about ingress ACL not egress. tor. 15. okt. 2020 12.00 skrev : > Simple, > > All stub autonomous systems should have a simple egress ACL allowing only > PI of their customers and their own PAs -it’s a simple ACL at each AS-Exit > points (towards transits/peers), that’s it. > > -not sure w

Re: Ingress filtering on transits, peers, and IX ports

2020-10-15 Thread Saku Ytti
Hey, > All stub autonomous systems should have a simple egress ACL allowing only PI > of their customers and their own PAs -it’s a simple ACL at each AS-Exit > points (towards transits/peers), that’s it. > > -not sure why this isn’t the first sentence in every BCP and “security > bulletin”… I

RE: Ingress filtering on transits, peers, and IX ports

2020-10-15 Thread adamv0025
Simple, All stub autonomous systems should have a simple egress ACL allowing only PI of their customers and their own PAs -it’s a simple ACL at each AS-Exit points (towards transits/peers), that’s it. -not sure why this isn’t the first sentence in every BCP and “security bulletin”… ada

Re: FCC FUSF charges clarification

2020-10-15 Thread Nuno Vieira via NANOG
Thanks all who replied. Yes in fact it is "ayo"-ending one, and i do have others in the very same location and this doesn't happen at all. Matter handed over to legal team. cheers /Nuno On Wed, 2020-10-14 at 16:58 -0700, Robert L Mathews wrote: > On 10/14/20 2:14 PM, Nuno Vieira via NANOG wrote

Re: Hurricane Electric AS6939

2020-10-15 Thread Radu-Adrian Feurdean
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020, at 22:40, Darin Steffl wrote: > For 1G or less, ethernet > might be cheaper with some protection already Not to mention that 1G waves are becoming less and less comon those days. In this part of the world waves tend to start at 10G.

Re: Cogent Layer 2

2020-10-15 Thread Saku Ytti
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 10:28, Ryan Hamel wrote: > My experience with multiple carriers is that reroutes happen in under a > minute but rarely happen, I also have redundant backup circuits to another > datacenter, so no traffic is truly lost. If an outage lasts longer than 5 > minutes, or it's

Re: Ingress filtering on transits, peers, and IX ports

2020-10-15 Thread Baldur Norddahl
All DNS resolvers discovered on our network belong to customers. Our own resolvers, running unbound, were not discovered. While filtering same AS on ingress could help those customers (but only one was a open relay), filtering bogons is something the customer can also do. Or the software can be fi

Re: Cogent Layer 2

2020-10-15 Thread Ryan Hamel
Saku, My experience with multiple carriers is that reroutes happen in under a minute but rarely happen, I also have redundant backup circuits to another datacenter, so no traffic is truly lost. If an outage lasts longer than 5 minutes, or it's flapping very frequently, then I call the carrier.