On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 11:35 AM Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> Great point ;-) thanks Tom
>
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 09:29 Tom Daly wrote:
>
>> Mehmet,
>>
>> Good idea, the opportunity for innovation and supporting ideas of others
>> in our operator groups is important, but NANOG is probably the wrong
Great point ;-) thanks Tom
On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 09:29 Tom Daly wrote:
> Mehmet,
>
> Good idea, the opportunity for innovation and supporting ideas of others
> in our operator groups is important, but NANOG is probably the wrong venue.
>
> Have you considered NANOG's 501c3 not-for-profit statu
Hey there,
I am trying to put together an event at NANOG Austin (will submit pc when
CFP is open). So many of us had very interesting ideas over the years. Some
of these ideas became products or companies making life easy for engineers
and operators. Could there be other ideas waiting to be suppor
On 28/Jun/19 10:35, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote:
> If the PEs are sufficiently small I'd even go further as to L3VPNs-PE vs
> L2VPNs-PE services etc..., it's mostly because of streamlined/simplified hw
> and code certification testing.
> But as with all the decentralize-centralize swi
4 matches
Mail list logo
