Not exactly. You don't need to advertise the RFC1918 to the OCA - just make
sure you advertise the CGN prefix to it, and make sure that the OCA's
default gateway knows how to reach the RFC1918 clients. So long as the
"outside" IP of your CGN is advertised to the OCA (the IP that clients who
would b
Thanks Dave, so my local OCA will listen to my BGP advertisements for RFC1918
prefixes if I decided to advertise them?
Aaron
> On Nov 25, 2018, at 10:47 PM, Dave Temkin wrote:
>
> FWIW (reviving an old thread)-
>
> Putting an OCA with bypass through the CGN with RFC1918 space will actually
>
FWIW (reviving an old thread)-
Putting an OCA with bypass through the CGN with RFC1918 space will actually
work just fine. We (Netflix) don't formally support it because of the vast
number of non-standard CGN implementations out there, but if your clients
are in RFC1918 space and the next hop rout
An acceptable alternative would be a cheap muxponder to take say 2x40 + 2x10
and stuff it into a 100G. Fiberstore used to have one, but don't seem to carry
it anymore.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
-
Getting issues from west-coast US clients trying to access services
like O365, Yahoo, GMail, etc. east-coast US doesn't seem to have the
same issue.
DNS servers are:
208.67.222.222
208.67.220.220
Switching to Google (8.8.8.8) fixes the issue.
Anyone else seeing this?
Ray
PS: Also posted to d
Thanks, but as I mentioned, I've got the validation/relying party side pretty
well covered which is what Routinator is. I'm looking for options for running a
delegated CA and potentially providing a publishing point.
--
Jeff
On November 25, 2018 5:45:21 PM EST, Michael Gehrmann
wrote:
>Hi Je
The MX204 can split each 100G port into 4x10G. Why not 4x25G ? This would
give you 16x 25G which seems quite reasonable.
Regards
Baldur
søn. 25. nov. 2018 23.43 skrev Tom Hill :
> On 25/11/2018 22:38, Aled Morris wrote:
> > Juniper have launched a Trident based switch with 48 x 25G ports (the
On 25/11/2018 22:38, Aled Morris wrote:
> Juniper have launched a Trident based switch with 48 x 25G ports (the
> QFX5120-48Y.)
I very specifically said "Juniper MX". ;)
--
Tom
On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 at 21:42, Tom Hill wrote:
> Chicken & egg: someone has to move first... And I don't see the ASR9k
> and Juniper MX BUs rushing to support 25 & 50G.
>
Juniper have launched a Trident based switch with 48 x 25G ports (the
QFX5120-48Y.)
But I agree the commercials aren't as sim
FS has reasonable pricing on their amplification systems for DWDM.
The problem in the states is the dark fiber consolidation, so it's difficult to
find someone that'll sell it to you. Those that do, charge astronomically for
it.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://
On 25/11/2018 21:52, Ben Cannon wrote:
> Single Wavelength Coherent or 4x10g coherent?
SFP28... So 1x25G, and direct detect.
> Actually FS has SFP28 CWDM optics (1270-1330) available but they are
> not up on the website, just as an FYI.
Missed that original mail, Tony. Good to know, thank you
On 25/11/2018 21:43, Ben Cannon wrote:
> At this point, with 400g coherent in production never mind long-haul
> testing; why bother lighting with anything slower than 100g coherent,
> especially at essentially the same price. It just makes no sense.
> It got skipped. We’re better for it IMO.
To
Single Wavelength Coherent or 4x10g coherent?
- Ben Cannon, AS15206
> On Nov 25, 2018, at 1:50 PM, Tony Wicks wrote:
>
> Actually FS has SFP28 CWDM optics (1270-1330) available but they are not up
> on the website, just as an FYI.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG On Behalf Of Tom
Actually FS has SFP28 CWDM optics (1270-1330) available but they are not up on
the website, just as an FYI.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Tom Hill
Sent: Monday, 26 November 2018 10:41 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Cheap switch with a couple 100G
On 25/11/2018 21:22,
At this point, with 400g coherent in production never mind long-haul testing;
why bother lighting with anything slower than 100g coherent, especially at
essentially the same price. It just makes no sense. It got skipped. We’re
better for it IMO.
- Ben Cannon, AS15206
> On Nov 25, 2018, at
On 25/11/2018 21:22, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
> If it is passive, you could tell them it is for 10G but use it for 25G?
The mux isn't the problem, it's that there aren't SFP28 optics commonly
available in C/DWDM wavelengths. Yet. If they were, well maybe...
... However, your trouble then is that 2
Used Cisco Nexus 93180YC (oh, I guess New, sorry, it was on eBay, so I assumed
used) is about $6,500, though I've heard they go down to $4k from time to time.
So then maybe that's the problem... not enough used 100G gear out there yet to
make it affordable... leaving 40G as the biggest cost-eff
If it is passive, you could tell them it is for 10G but use it for 25G?
søn. 25. nov. 2018 19.32 skrev Tom Hill :
> On 25/11/2018 18:16, Mike Hammett wrote:
> > I haven't seen anyone selling 25G or 50G transport.
>
>
> That's because, in active transport at least, 100G makes far more sense.
>
>
On 2018-11-25 21:16, Mike Hammett wrote:
> No, not new. No need to buy new switches when there are so many used
> available (except for now needing 100G). Switches
> have an extremely long life. I have a client that has 15 year old Foundry
> switches that just work, though we're looking
> to repl
On 11/25/18 3:06 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
Arista 7050sx
I've seen these and their friends on the fleabay for about $1000 in
working condition. It does happen, though I'd not say you can just drop
in and BIN one any time any day.
I picked up a Ruckus/Arris ICX7650 with 40G module (so 2x 100G
No, not new. No need to buy new switches when there are so many used available
(except for now needing 100G). Switches have an extremely long life. I have a
client that has 15 year old Foundry switches that just work, though we're
looking to replace them to get some 10G ports.
The pricing was
Mike,
Are you saying that you can buy a new Cisco Nexus 3064 or Arista 7050sx for
$1,000 new from these vendors, or are you talking about used stuff on eBay?
If you are comparing to used stuff on ebay pricing good luck. I doubt you
will find many used 100G switches as they are too new of a technol
On 25/11/2018 18:59, Mike Hammett wrote:
> It wouldn't be hard to do any standard wavelength, really. They just
> need an appropriate mux.
I'm really not sure that your statement makes sense by itself.
--
Tom
It wouldn't be hard to do any standard wavelength, really. They just need an
appropriate mux.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Hill"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunda
That’s because the DWDM solutions (at least the good ones, wisely) use
single-wavelength 100Ghz coherent light (like, you know, normal optics from the
rest of history), and do not play this 4x25g lane splitting game.
Unfortunately they are still quite expensive and physically large, smallest I
On 25/11/2018 18:16, Mike Hammett wrote:
> I haven't seen anyone selling 25G or 50G transport.
That's because, in active transport at least, 100G makes far more sense.
You may start seeing passive 25G WDM soon. Finisar have a DWDM tunable,
I believe.
--
Tom
I haven't seen anyone selling 25G or 50G transport.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Saku Ytti"
To: "Mike Hammett"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2018
I don't need 32 of them, though. 2 - 6 would be fine, 4 - 6 would be ideal.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "joel jaeggli"
To: "Mike Hammett"
Cc: "North American Networ
No.
Cisco Nexus 3064, Arista 7050sx, etc.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Church"
To: "Mike Hammett" , "North American Network Operators'
Group"
Sent: Sunday,
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 8:48 PM Hal Murray <
hgm+na...@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net> wrote:
>
> Keith Medcalf said:
> > "just static content" would be more accurate ...
>
> and using http rather than https
>
> > There were many attempts at this by Johhny-cum-lately ISPs back in the
> 90's
>
Under 1K for 48 10G ports? Are you missing a decimal place?
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2018 9:39 AM
To: 'North American Network Operators' Group'
Subject: Cheap switch with a couple 100G
I keep hearing how cheap 100G is co
The argument should be 50G is cheaper than 40G.
Because serdes is 25G typically, you get 25, 50, 100 without gearboxes
and retimers, so less pincount, less thermal, higher density, lower
cost.
But BOM impact to pricing isn't high anyhow, unless we're talking
about massive port counts.
If box DOE
I keep hearing how cheap 100G is compared to 40G and it doesn't seem to hold
true. Prove me wrong.
Cisco Nexus and Arista both have switches with 48x 10G ports and 2x - 6x 40G
ports for under $1k. Swap those 40G for 100G and you're at $5k - $7k.
Am I missing some cheap switches with 100G?
I a
33 matches
Mail list logo
