Re: listserv hosed? [Was: Fwd: nanog.org mailing list memberships reminder]

On 2018-02-01 22:59, Paul Ferguson wrote: > Started getting a series of these just now from the past. :-) Same here. The 821 headers show Received: to be "now", while the RFC 822 headers have a Date of first of where Month started in August 2017. Suspect something got reset and the list serve

listserv hosed? [Was: Fwd: nanog.org mailing list memberships reminder]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 oh noes. the listserv deded. Started getting a series of these just now from the past. :-) And yes, the headers reveal that they are indeed coming from the NANOG listserv/MailMan. Can someone please fix that? kthxbai. :-) - - ferg - F

Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics

You can see the CWDM mux listed on their site, and they will also make custom mux for you. Let me know if you need a Sales Contact for them.. My last set of muxes from them were custom muxes and they were able to get me a configuration with a lower insertion loss than what is listed on their

Incapsula AS19551

Hello all If anyone from Incapsula can contact me off-list, I would highly appreciate. We are not able to access several sites hosted in Incapsula from source AS59318 and from our downstream. The issues only happened from yesterday. Many thanks vireak

Re: IPv6 traffic percentages?

More stats : https://as24904.kwaoo.net/as-stats/top.php We are one of raf's competitor in France, FTTH based operator ~ 20% of our customers are ipv6-enabled ~ 5% of total traffic is IPv6 On 19/06/2017 13:52, Aaron Gould wrote: > When you say some percentage is with Google, what do you mean by

IPv6 operations discussions

The IETF v6ops working group is chartered to improve the operation of IPv6. We have several active documents right now that would benefit from broader operator feedback. For instance, there is current active discussion on: Requirements for IPv6 Routers

Google Security Contact

Hi, There is a potential vulnerability in Gmail / Google Inbox which I need to discuss and verify with the Google Security Team. Is there anyone on that team here on NANOG who can contact me off-list please? Best to contact me at k...@invinsec.com. Thanks! Ken

Re: IPv4 Hijacking For Idiots

Scott Weeks wrote: > --- s...@xopher.net wrote: > From: Scott Christopher > > I think the solution is legislation + regulations. > - > > For sure dude, because, you know, they do such a > great job of all the other stuff they touch! > > scott > > ps. NOT! I