System automation and life cycle management is exponentially easier when you
have uniform environments. I am in the process of standardizing global
infrastructure and developing the automation process now.
Nolan
From: NANOG on behalf of valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
Polarization and dispersion will come into play at these distances if you plan
on running a DWDM system. In that world you get what you pay for as a rule.
The more expensive gear is more forgiving to fiber that is not 100 % up to high
quality. Most small one or two RU gear from all the vendor
In a message written on Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 03:36:10PM -0500, Chris Grundemann
wrote:
> If you have a case study, lesson learned, data point, or even just a strong
> opinion; I'd love to hear it!
I think the high level items are pretty clear here:
1 Vendor
Quicker/easier to implement, staff on
You will want to request an OTDR characterization of the dark fiber path
from its owner. If you can post OTDR "shots" with full resolution images in
a lossless image format to the list, we may be able to take a guess if the
distance is feasible without amplification inline.
For equipment choices y
Jeremy,
SmartOptics is one such vendor that I've used in the past that may be able
to do this.
http://www.smartoptics.com/
-Josh
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Brian R wrote:
> I have to agree with Brandon. I have not worked with Ciena equipment
> directly but have work with carriers that
I have to agree with Brandon. I have not worked with Ciena equipment directly
but have work with carriers that use it. I worked with Adtran on this kind of
setup and like Brandon said they require a lot of information to build what is
needed for each specific run (fiber type, quality, wave len
6 matches
Mail list logo
