Re: [SPAM] Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

On 11/Nov/16 21:34, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Has the name been a problem for you? Asking vendors about support > must be a bit awkward these days. Why do you reckon? Mark.

Re: USDA IT Contacts?

They have a lot more at N.I.T.C. though. https://www.ocio.usda.gov/about-ocio/data-center-operations-dco On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: > USDA has a LOT of their IT in Ft. Collins, so that’s not irrational. > > Owen > >> On Nov 11, 2016, at 11:27 , rw...@ropeguru.com wrote:

Re: USDA IT Contacts?

USDA has a LOT of their IT in Ft. Collins, so that’s not irrational. Owen > On Nov 11, 2016, at 11:27 , rw...@ropeguru.com wrote: > > The very last POC was updated in 2015, but also out of Fort Collins. > > On Fri, 11 Nov 2016 12:59:16 -0600 > Josh Reynolds wrote: >> Just looking at that info.

Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

* Mark Tinka: > I've given a talk about this a couple of times since 2008. But our > reasons are to choosing IS-IS are: Has the name been a problem for you? Asking vendors about support must be a bit awkward these days.

Re: USDA IT Contacts?

The very last POC was updated in 2015, but also out of Fort Collins. On Fri, 11 Nov 2016 12:59:16 -0600 Josh Reynolds wrote: Just looking at that info... hasn't been updated since 2005 and is listed as being at Ft Collins. So I'll be complaining to some people on Monday :) On Fri, Nov 11

Re: USDA IT Contacts?

Just looking at that info... hasn't been updated since 2005 and is listed as being at Ft Collins. So I'll be complaining to some people on Monday :) On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Herriage, James L. wrote: > POCs here: > uda.gov = 162.79.29.12 > https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-162-79-0

Weekly Routing Table Report

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG, SdNOG, BJNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.

Re: Spitballing IoT Security

Moving offlist on this. For those who are interested, send ping. On 11/11/16 4:42 PM, Marcel Plug wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 1:55 AM, Eliot Lear > wrote: > > It is worth asking what protections are necessary for a device that > regulates insulin.

Re: Spitballing IoT Security

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 1:55 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: > It is worth asking what protections are necessary for a device that > regulates insulin. Insulin pumps are an example of devices that have been over-regulated to the point where any and all innovation has been stifled. There have been hardly

RE: USDA IT Contacts?

POCs here: uda.gov = 162.79.29.12 https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-162-79-0-0-1/pft?s=162.79.29.12 Thanks, Lee -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Charles Gagnon Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 4:20 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: USDA IT Con

Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

Hi, What IGP features do you need, and for what reason? Cheers, mh⁣​Le 10 nov. 2016, à 23:04, Josh Reynolds a écrit: I didn't "trash talk" a vendor. If I did, it would be a multi-thousand line hate fueled rant with examples and enough colorful language to make submarine crews blush. Cisco has

Re: USDA IT Contacts?

Just a head's up, resolution may not happen today - it's veteran's day, which of course is a federal holiday. On Nov 11, 2016 8:17 AM, "Charles Gagnon" wrote: > Would anyone have information about IT contacts within the US Government? > Some of our IP ranges seem to be blocked from access to som

Re: USDA IT Contacts?

*Cough* I might know some people. Standby. On Nov 11, 2016 8:17 AM, "Charles Gagnon" wrote: > Would anyone have information about IT contacts within the US Government? > Some of our IP ranges seem to be blocked from access to some government web > servers (discovered on http://www.usda.gov - we

Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

My first post: On Nov 10, 2016 6:24 PM, "Charles van Niman" wrote: > Your original point was that a list of vendors "didn't get IS-IS" but > provided no details about what you are talking about. As far as all > the documentation I have read, and some of the documentation you > linked to, it work

USDA IT Contacts?

Would anyone have information about IT contacts within the US Government? Some of our IP ranges seem to be blocked from access to some government web servers (discovered on http://www.usda.gov - we get a odd "access denied" page there - traces point to the same IP at akamaitechnologies.com). I hav

Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

In my experience/personal opinion, compared to OSPF2/3, in a large ISP, ISIS: - has simpler and better, less bloated code. Think ISIS on Juniper. Think FreeBSD vs Linux. - is more modular to introduce new features. - has certain knobs which makes it a bit more useful for ISP (LSP lifetime/Max numb

AS37135, AS6560, AS32714, AS14029 - Squatted or not? You be the judge.

At least one person has now asserted to me in private email that my suggestion that AS30186 was being squatted on was in fact accurate. Thus, I now feel confident enough to provide here the rest of the story which goes along with that. In a nutshell, AS30186 and also two other ASNs, together appe

Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

On 11/Nov/16 12:07, Baldur Norddahl wrote: > No filters. There are just no routes that will take a network packet that > arrive on an interface in VRF internet and move it to an interface in VRF > default without adding a MPLS header to mark the VRF. With the MPLS header > the packet type is no

Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

Den 11. nov. 2016 06.41 skrev "Mark Tinka" : > > > > On 10/Nov/16 21:43, Baldur Norddahl wrote: > >> >> And at the day work I also prefer OSPFv2 simply because I do not need more protocols in the stack. We are running a MPLS network with the internet service in a L3VPN. IPv6 is also in the L3VPN. T