On Wed, 22 Sep 2016, John Levine wrote:
For domain registration I found that joining the GoDaddy Domain Club
( $120/year or less if you pay ahead for multiple years [1] ) ...
There's a lot of registrars with prepay discounts. Gandi's domains
are cheaper if you prepay $600, a lot cheaper if yo
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 08:52:29PM -, John Levine wrote:
> In article
> you
> write:
> >FWIW, as I'm in the middle of this right now. It would appear that many of
> >the less expensive registrars no longer support glue records in any
> >meaningful way. They all expect you to host DNS with t
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:35 PM, John Levine wrote:
>>For domain registration I found that joining the GoDaddy Domain Club
>>( $120/year or less if you pay ahead for multiple years [1] ) ...
> There's a lot of registrars with prepay discounts. Gandi's domains
> are cheaper if you prepay $600, a l
I've had quite good luck with: Gandi, Hover, 101domains, and Google
Domains -- depending on which cc/TLDs you're looking for.
Justin Paine
Head of Trust & Safety
CloudFlare Inc.
PGP: BBAA 6BCE 3305 7FD6 6452 7115 57B6 0114 DE0B 314D
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 6:35 PM, John Levine wro
No problem.
If you can drop a pcap file somewhere we can reach (and drop me an email where)
that was created during the event that'd be great.
Thanks again, and great use of the list.
Best,
Martin Hannigan
AS 20940 // AS 32787
> On Sep 21, 2016, at 15:29, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> Thanks M
>For domain registration I found that joining the GoDaddy Domain Club
>( $120/year or less if you pay ahead for multiple years [1] ) ...
There's a lot of registrars with prepay discounts. Gandi's domains
are cheaper if you prepay $600, a lot cheaper if you prepay $2000.
R's,
John
Thanks Marty. I have only experienced this on my network once and it was
directly with Microsoft, so I haven't done much until a couple days ago when I
started this campaign. I don't know if anyone else has brought this to anyone's
attention. I just sent an e-mail to Owen when I saw yours.
Mike,
I will forward to the requisite group for a look. Have you brought this to our
attention previously? I don't see anything. If you did, please forward me the
ticket numbers or message(s) (peering@ is best) so wee can track down and see
if someone already has it in queue.
Jared alluded to
I use DNS Made Easy for all of my DNS hosting, which I'm happy to
recommend.
For domain registration I found that joining the GoDaddy Domain Club
( $120/year or less if you pay ahead for multiple years [1] ) is a good
deal for the quantity of domains I own (56 and counting). It's kind of like
S
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Jdm0dOBf81kSnXEvVfI6ZJbWFNt5AbYUV8CDxGwLSm8/edit?usp=sharing
I have made the anonymized answers public. This will obviously have some bias
to it given that I mostly know fixed wireless operators, but I'm hoping this
gets some good distribution to catch m
There are still many registrars that don't support DNSSEC (possibly only
for a subset of TLDs), and/or have an unusable or cumbersome interface for
adding DNSSEC glue. Just another thing to watch out for...
EasyDNS has gone beyond the normal registrar dilligence and has
resisted bogus takedowns and other things, where many would just
bend over backwards. They can do this a bit more easily by being in Canada
as well:
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160606/10541834640/riaa-demands-takedown-thepirat
In message
, Jeff Jones writes:
> Hello All,
>
> Sorry if this is low level. But are people sick of registrars jacking up
> prices? Who is the cheapest and most reliable? I have been using whois.com,
> networksolutions.com and am looking for input on who is cheap, secure,
> reliable registrar. T
:: I have made this into a Google Form to make it easier to
:: track compared to randomly formatted responses on multiple
:: mailing lists, Facebook Groups, etc.
Yeah, because...
but I don't do email like that
why is it hard to read?
it's really hard to read email this way.
because it's o
In article
you write:
>FWIW, as I'm in the middle of this right now. It would appear that many of
>the less expensive registrars no longer support glue records in any
>meaningful way. They all expect you to host DNS with them. So might want
>to check on that before buying the cheapest and hostin
FWIW, as I'm in the middle of this right now. It would appear that many of
the less expensive registrars no longer support glue records in any
meaningful way. They all expect you to host DNS with them. So might want
to check on that before buying the cheapest and hosting your own DNS.
/rh
On Mon,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:19:43PM -0400, Jeff Jones wrote:
Who is the cheapest and most reliable?
I've had an excellent experience with NearlyFreeSpeech:
https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net/
They have a high level of technical clue, don't try to upsell me
things I don't need or want (alth
> On 21 Sep 2016, at 19:43, james machado wrote:
>
> so who would you quantify as secure and reliable? who does not require
> additional "services" besides registration or spend all their time trying
> to upsell you?
>
> james
I have always liked https://www.gandi.net/
- Mark
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:43:50AM -0700, james machado wrote:
> so who would you quantify as secure and reliable? who does not require
> additional "services" besides registration or spend all their time trying
> to upsell you?
i'm good with easydns.com
--jim
>
> james
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 201
so who would you quantify as secure and reliable? who does not require
additional "services" besides registration or spend all their time trying
to upsell you?
james
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Jim Mercer wrote:
>
> cheap, secure, reliable
>
> pick two.
>
> --jim
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016
cheap, secure, reliable
pick two.
--jim
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Jeff Jones wrote:
> Sorry if this is low level. But are people sick of registrars jacking up
> prices? Who is the cheapest and most reliable? I have been using whois.com,
> networksolutions.com and am looking for input o
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 13:19:43 -0400, Jeff Jones said:
> networksolutions.com and am looking for input on who is cheap, secure,
> reliable registrar. Thanks for your input.
cheap, secure, reliable - pick any two.
(The driver here is "cheap" - the other two criteria can be almost anything,
but to d
$9.88 for commercial domains seems under the average from what I've seen
from other registrars
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Jeff Jones wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Sorry if this is low level. But are people sick of registrars jacking up
> prices? Who is the cheapest and most reliable? I have bee
Hello All,
Sorry if this is low level. But are people sick of registrars jacking up
prices? Who is the cheapest and most reliable? I have been using whois.com,
networksolutions.com and am looking for input on who is cheap, secure,
reliable registrar. Thanks for your input.
~Jeff
Hi the list =)
Someone from AT&T on the list ?
We have a potential BGP leak on a recently transfered /16
Sent email to noc @ but no reply since 6 hours.
Perhaps someone can contact me directly ? fabien AT beufa DOT net
Thanks
-
Fabien VINCENT
--
I am having an issue where since the the old twt convergence by Level 3 to
the GBLX network/AS3549 our v6 prefix isn't being announced outside of
Level 3. I have had a ticket open for a week and had one engineer who
seemed to be on to fixing it (regarding an export policy) but then that
went silent
Can someone from ebay NOC (or similar) contact me off list for an issue with
search results from a specific CIDR of our network that the end user swears
doesn't happen elsewhere?
Thanks.
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which
it is addressed and may con
I have a hard time accepting that service providers should re-engineer
their networks because other companies cannot properly engineer their abuse
tooling.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Justin Wilson wrote:
> PSN is one reason I am not a fan of CGNAT. All they see are tons of
> connections f
I've had DSL and AE service providers respond with the issues.
So far there is not a common element other than CDNs.
That's the point of the questions I'm asking, to gather a ton of information
and then figure out how to act on it.
You're assuming that the CDNs are using an unmolested, vanil
It appears all complaints are from SP doing wireless. I am going to go with
a yes and put forth a these that these guys have a common factor somewhere.
It could be equipment from a some popular vendor of wireless or maybe some
common method to throttle that is popular in the wireless community.
I
https://goo.gl/forms/LvgFRsMdNdI8E9HF3
I have made this into a Google Form to make it easier to track compared to
randomly formatted responses on multiple mailing lists, Facebook Groups, etc.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WIS
That's interesting.
Once, a few years/jobs/etc ago, I observed a flow from mobile youtube being
really really bursty, peaking to a 40-50mbps on a 10mbps circuit, but that was
the only time I've ever seen such an issue. After that one flow died, it never
happened again.
That aside, I do work fo
With so many geographically diverse complaints on many hardware routing and
switching platforms, I'm going to go with a "no".
On Sep 21, 2016 4:04 AM, "Baldur Norddahl"
wrote:
> How come we have never seen this problem? We have a ton of DSL and many of
> those are slow, but no customer complaint
On 21/09/16 11:53, Mel Beckman wrote:
> This is a very comprehensive article, and worth handing out to techs. I have
> one comment on Balder’s OTDR suggestion, and one on the article’s microscope
> instructions.
>
> Although it certainly can’t hurt to run an OTDR test (except for extended
> dow
Likewise, why was it never an issue before and why does it only affect certain
types of traffic from certain CDNs?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Baldur Norddahl"
To: nanog@nanog.org
This is a very comprehensive article, and worth handing out to techs. I have
one comment on Balder’s OTDR suggestion, and one on the article’s microscope
instructions.
Although it certainly can’t hurt to run an OTDR test (except for extended
downtime), I fear hauling out the extra gear will pro
Can someone from Yahoo as#10310 contact me off-list, we have some
problems reaching Yahoo through Telia and GTT.
Thanks.
--
Mohamed Kamal
Core Network Sr. Engineer
On 21 Sep 2016, at 15:37, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
Which means we may ignore it instead.
. . . copy/paste or awk/sed or whatever isn't an option? If not, have
you requested a) separate notifications per source and/or b) a more
textual-manipulation-friendly format? Unless they're sending .gi
How come we have never seen this problem? We have a ton of DSL and many
of those are slow, but no customer complaints about overloaded lines
from CDN networks.
Could it be that the way you throttle the bandwidth is defect? It is
easy to blame the other guy but could it be that you are doing it
It is a good article. It is missing a few points:
If you are going to do the full efford of cleaning and then microscope
each connector, you would also want to finish off by doing a OTDR scan
of the link. This is your documentation for a clean link.
Always use optics that can monitor the sign
Hi
We have the opposite problem with PSN: Sometimes they will send abuse
reports with several of our IP addresses listed. The problem with that
is that we can not give data about one customer to another customer. By
listing multiple IP addresses we are prevented from forwarding the email
to t
41 matches
Mail list logo
