Re: Frontier FlashWave Support contact

2016-08-02 Thread Mel Beckman
Thank you Frontier for the very rapid out-of-band contact! -mel beckman > On Aug 2, 2016, at 6:28 PM, Mel Beckman wrote: > > Can someone from Frontier provide a CO contact for customer-prem FlashWave > units? We have several in alarm, although otherwise functional, but Frontier > front line

RE: Brighthouse Orlando Port blocking ISAKMP

2016-08-02 Thread Eric C. Miller
All is well, now. It appears that it may have been on XO's network. My crypto tunnel between AT&T and BH crossed XO, and asymmetric routing from my office network had Cogent and XO outgoing, and Level3 on the return. If I forced my office connection to use Level3 for the outbound, the tunnel es

Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology

2016-08-02 Thread David Barak via NANOG
Simpler > complex *sometimes*. It turns out that sometimes the complexity is worth it (eg https://youtu.be/-iiXsbrEv3U ). Perhaps "as simple as possible, by no simpler" would be reasonable? David Barak Sent from mobile device, please excuse autocorrection artifacts > On Aug 2, 2016, at 7:08

Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology

2016-08-02 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Tue, 02 Aug 2016 19:16:04 -0700, Eric Kuhnke said: > But but but... cloud! THE CLOUD! Cloudy clouds fluffy white flying > through the air, you should move everything to the Cloud (tm). Running the stuff you need to keep your own network running on the cloud? That's the sort of thing I encour

Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology

2016-08-02 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > But but but... cloud! THE CLOUD! Cloudy clouds fluffy white flying > through the air, you should move everything to the Cloud (tm). > > Sometimes people forget that *somebody* needs to run the bare metal and OSI > layer 1 things that physic

Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology

2016-08-02 Thread Eric Kuhnke
But but but... cloud! THE CLOUD! Cloudy clouds fluffy white flying through the air, you should move everything to the Cloud (tm). Sometimes people forget that *somebody* needs to run the bare metal and OSI layer 1 things that physically make up the cloud. On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Ca By

Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology

2016-08-02 Thread Ca By
On Tuesday, August 2, 2016, Kasper Adel wrote: > Hi, > > I am interested in hearing the approach and thought-process that senior > people on NANOG are following when presented with an NFV solution. Assuming > that the exercise at hand is to consider NFV for future expansions of > Firewalls and L3

NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology

2016-08-02 Thread Kasper Adel
Hi, I am interested in hearing the approach and thought-process that senior people on NANOG are following when presented with an NFV solution. Assuming that the exercise at hand is to consider NFV for future expansions of Firewalls and L3VPNs or stay with the existing model of what is called PNF (

Frontier FlashWave Support contact

2016-08-02 Thread Mel Beckman
Can someone from Frontier provide a CO contact for customer-prem FlashWave units? We have several in alarm, although otherwise functional, but Frontier front line support seems unable to open tickets on this gear, since it's not apparently considered CPE by Frontier. -mel beckman

Verizon Wireless contact

2016-08-02 Thread Matt Larson
Could someone from Verizon Wireless please contact me off-list? Thanks, Matt -- Matt Larson VP of Research Office of the CTO, ICANN +1 240 459-9562 (mobile)

RE: Level3 (3356) to outlook.office365.com via v6?

2016-08-02 Thread Sam Norris
We have 2 customers complaining about this in the past 3 days - both using IPv4 only. Glad to see this because maybe it’s a larger problem outside of our network. Sam > -Original Message- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of David Hubbard > Sent: Tuesday, August

Level3 (3356) to outlook.office365.com via v6?

2016-08-02 Thread David Hubbard
Curious if anyone else is having issues reaching outlook.office365.com via ipv6 over Level 3? Our customers have begun reporting failures checking email, and in the ones who have had this issue, are using the mail server name outlook.office365.com and are on v6. Traceroute6 shows the traffic d

CenturyLink Executive

2016-08-02 Thread Dennis Burgess
I have been working on a circuit outage since Monday morning, my tickets are closed, can't get ahold of anyone, no phone calls, problem not resolved, anyone from CenturyLink Executive Team could give me a call or e-mail to see if we can get these issues solved. [DennisBurgessSignature] www.link

Re: ExtremeWare

2016-08-02 Thread Alain Hebert
Hey, Those are still current here =D But yes 12.x or 15.x XOS has support, but only for official EN optics. - Alain Hebertaheb...@pubnix.net PubNIX Inc. 50 boul. St-Charles P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 Tel: 514-990

Re: Operations task management software?

2016-08-02 Thread Saku Ytti
On 27 July 2016 at 21:16, David Hubbard wrote: Hey, > Hi all, curious if anyone has recommendations on software that helps manage > routine duties assigned to operations staff? I'd solicit opinions as well. There are few features I'd like to see: 1) ability to create parent+child, if all chil

RE: ExtremeWare

2016-08-02 Thread Robert Jacobs
To old feature was not supported on that code rev or model. Robert Jacobs | Network Director/Architect Direct:  832-615-7742 Main:   832-615-8000 Fax:    713-510-1650 5959 Corporate Dr. Suite 3300; Houston, TX 77036 A Certified Woman-Owned Business 24x7x365 Customer  Support: 832-615

Re: Operations task management software?

2016-08-02 Thread Jeroen Wunnink
We use redmine, combined with scripts that call it’s API to create automated tickets/tasks that NOC or engineers need to attend to. Has email notifications, wiki, documents, files, code repo, calendar, customisable fields all built in. — Jeroen Wunnink IP Engineering Manager Hibernia Networks

Re: Operations task management software?

2016-08-02 Thread Matt Ryanczak
Jira works well as a task tracking system for ops. Customizable work flows, decent integration with ldap, etc. Also good for tracking software projects. Having both software and ops tasks in one place has many benefits. On Wed, Jul 27, 2016, 16:28 David Hubbard wrote: > Full automation is planne