Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:39:03PM +, Nevin Gonsalves wrote:
> I just had to sit and trace all the cables to make sure the tx/rx
> lined up for the right circuits as well as hitting the right patch
> panel ports. Once all that got aligned nicely things started working
> magically.
Yep, ports in a
On 25/May/16 00:14, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
> Or a very reckless oversubscription ratio and misjudgment of the customer,
> example, if a provider had 2 x 100GbE capacity between two locations and
> sold a customer a 100GbE EoMPLS transport circuit from A to Z, based on the
> mistaken idea of "Well th
On 5/24/16 05:17, Mitchell Lewis wrote:
Hi,I am looking to validate the performance specs of a core router. I am
looking for a network traffic simulator which can simulate 40 gbps of traffic.
I am looking for a simulator with sfp+ ports.
I am interested in any input as to brands to look at, b
If this is a one time thing, you're probably better off renting an Ixia or
Spirent device. If you find yourself doing this a few times a year, might
be worth investing in one. Not only for just throughput testing but
spamming packets for testing DoS, testing convergence times of routing
protocols
On 24 May 2016 at 13:17, Mitchell Lewis wrote:
> Hi,I am looking to validate the performance specs of a core router. I am
> looking for a network traffic simulator which can simulate 40 gbps of
> traffic. I am looking for a simulator with sfp+ ports.
> I am interested in any input as to brands t
Or a very reckless oversubscription ratio and misjudgment of the customer,
example, if a provider had 2 x 100GbE capacity between two locations and
sold a customer a 100GbE EoMPLS transport circuit from A to Z, based on the
mistaken idea of "Well these guys probably aren't going to peak more than
3
I've used Spirent in the past. They do a hardware option, as well as a VM.
Lots of things supported like BGP, and PPP.
Regards,
Dave
On 24 May 2016 at 21:31, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> I’m in the process of building a box using MoonGen [1] and a supported
> Intel 82599 6 port SFP+ NIC [2] that is c
On 24/May/16 06:29, Rob Laidlaw wrote:
> Yes. Many vendors are using l2vpn/pseudo-wire services of one sort or
> another to provide circuits and most do not transport LACP by default.
To the OP's case, commercially, I'd find it interesting to transport a
100Gbps circuit as EoMPLS rather than E
I’m in the process of building a box using MoonGen [1] and a supported Intel
82599 6 port SFP+ NIC [2] that is coming in at just under US$3800 all-in.
Supposed to be able to drive at least the entire card at line rate for that
price and have enough CPU and memory slots free to fill the box up w
Siama also does this. I don't own any. But I've used them with some of my
customers.
http://siamasystems.com/?page_id=2280
Regards,
Ray Orsini – CEO
Orsini IT, LLC – Technology Consultants
VOICE DATA BANDWIDTH SECURITY SUPPORT
P: 305.967.6756 x1009 E: r...@orsiniit.com TF: 844.OIT.VOIP
IXIA would be the only company I know of.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Mitchell Lewis
wrote:
> Hi,I am looking to validate the performance specs of a core router. I am
> looking for a network tra
We are heavily invested in Ixia, they are very expensive, but if you need
the kind of precision they provide they work very well.
*Spencer Ryan* | Senior Systems Administrator | sr...@arbor.net
*Arbor Networks*
+1.734.794.5033 (d) | +1.734.846.2053 (m)
www.arbornetworks.com
On Tue, May 24, 2016
Hi,I am looking to validate the performance specs of a core router. I am
looking for a network traffic simulator which can simulate 40 gbps of traffic.
I am looking for a simulator with sfp+ ports.
I am interested in any input as to brands to look at, build one myself etc.
Thanks,Mitchell
Yes. Many vendors are using l2vpn/pseudo-wire services of one sort or
another to provide circuits and most do not transport LACP by default.
LACP uses slow-protocols address:
https://wiki.wireshark.org/LinkAggregationControlProtocol
If they are using ALU gear, they can enable this using the port
Eric Kuhnke writes:
> http://www.adventuresinoss.com/2009/09/30/the-many-uses-of-net-snmp/
Ha! I've never seen that article, thanks for pointing it out.
Note that the performance of Net-SNMP's extensibility mechanisms should
way into the decision. The fastest backend needs to be written in C,
Will get appropriate folks engaged. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG on behalf of David Sotnick
Date: Monday, May 23, 2016 at 1:59 PM
To: "nanog@nanog.org"
Subject: Need Comcast IPv6 routing assistance please
Hello NANOG,
Could someone from Comcast IPv6 routing team please c
Hi John,
I have been working with Courtney Smith and a fix has been implemented.
Apparently a bunch of new Level(3) peering circuits were turned up on 5/15
and that's when the chronic packet loss problem started for our users.
I have not been informed of the details as to what was causing such pa
Thanks all..!
I just had to sit and trace all the cables to make sure the tx/rx lined up for
the right circuits as well as hitting the right patch panel ports. Once all
that got aligned nicely things started working magically. thanks,-nevin
On Tuesday, May 24, 2016 2:49 AM, Eygene Ryabink
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13:18PM +0200, Marco Paesani wrote:
> Whats happened today at PeeringDB web site ?
And PeeringDB is back in business!
http://instituut.net/~job/screenshots/2f255c17a8aa9cb99121b448.png
A post-mortem will be shared on the pdb-tech@ list later today.
Kind regards,
Job
I disagree somewhat, without a view of how you are being hijacked there often
can be no remediation. Yahoo for example provides no cloud services so you
can't purchase a view of their routing by getting a VM.
Jared Mauch
> On May 24, 2016, at 12:29 PM, Max Tulyev wrote:
>
> I'm right here at
Hi guys,
We're after a good Singapore Telecom (AS7473) sales rep. After some IP
transit in the Singapore and Hong Kong markets.
Anyone have details that you wouldn't mind passing along?
Much appreciated!
Hi Job,
thanks for prompt replay and info.
Kind regards,
Marco Paesani
Skype: mpaesani
Mobile: +39 348 6019349
Success depends on the right choice !
Email: ma...@paesani.it
2016-05-24 12:22 GMT+02:00 Job Snijders :
> Hi Marco,
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13:18PM +0200, Marco Paesani wrot
I'm right here at RIPE 72 now, so I saw it of course ;)
The problem is not peering itself, but more general problem of filtering
nets, and it was told in the presentation.
On 24.05.16 13:19, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
>> On May 24, 2016, at 6:11 AM, Max Tulyev wrote:
>>
>> If you dig into hijacking t
Regarding the thread:
http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2016-May/085878.html
David,
I looked around CA and it looks like some customers are provisioned with two
delegated IPv6 prefixes. We had an issue a week or so back that we believe was
corrected. If you wish contact me off list.
Hi Marco,
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13:18PM +0200, Marco Paesani wrote:
> Whats happened totady at PeeringDB web site ?
We ran out of peerings, but as we speak our service provider is printing
new ones ;-)
In all seriousness: our SP has issues with a storage array. The staff is
aware and they a
https://twitter.com/PeeringDB/status/735026726053531649
Not sure it’s known yet :D
Regards,
Marty Strong
--
CloudFlare - AS13335
Network Engineer
ma...@cloudflare.com
+44 7584 906 055
smartflare (Skype)
http://www.peeringdb.com/view.php?asn=13335
> On 24 May
> On May 24, 2016, at 6:11 AM, Max Tulyev wrote:
>
> If you dig into hijacking topic more, you will see that hijacks through
> Tier1 is same or even more popular than through IXes.
You may not have a view into that you’re being hijacked and used to send
SPAM for example:
https://ripe72.ripe.ne
Whats happened totady at PeeringDB web site ?
Kind regards,
Marco Paesani
Skype: mpaesani
Mobile: +39 348 6019349
Success depends on the right choice !
Email: ma...@paesani.it
If you dig into hijacking topic more, you will see that hijacks through
Tier1 is same or even more popular than through IXes.
And if someone want to make me a transit offer for the price of DE-CIX
(I do not even ask the price of DTEL-IX peering ;) ) - please, contact
me off-list, I will be really
Nevin, good day.
Sun, May 22, 2016 at 07:55:31PM +, Nevin Gonsalves via NANOG wrote:
> Hoping someone may have come across a similar issue. Has anyone ever
> seen a situation where maybe like a Level3 transport system could be
> possibly dropping LACP frames..?
> End point A - tx and rx count
> On May 16, 2016, at 4:29 PM, Baldur Norddahl
> wrote:
>
> Router ports are expensive, so even if cross connects were free, you would
> still use the public switch fabric until you reach a traffic level that
> justifies a direct connection. The point of having a IX switch is that you
> can con
Typically you would use a private VLAN between you and another participant in
order to connect to them separately from the public peering VLAN. You would do
this instead of a PNI in a situation where you’re in a different building from
the other participant making a direct fibre more expensive t
32 matches
Mail list logo
