I disagree somewhat, without a view of how you are being hijacked there often can be no remediation. Yahoo for example provides no cloud services so you can't purchase a view of their routing by getting a VM.
Jared Mauch > On May 24, 2016, at 12:29 PM, Max Tulyev <max...@netassist.ua> wrote: > > I'm right here at RIPE 72 now, so I saw it of course ;) > > The problem is not peering itself, but more general problem of filtering > nets, and it was told in the presentation. > >> On 24.05.16 13:19, Jared Mauch wrote: >> >>> On May 24, 2016, at 6:11 AM, Max Tulyev <max...@netassist.ua> wrote: >>> >>> If you dig into hijacking topic more, you will see that hijacks through >>> Tier1 is same or even more popular than through IXes. >> >> You may not have a view into that you’re being hijacked and used to send >> SPAM for example: >> >> https://ripe72.ripe.net/presentations/45-Invisible_Hijacking.pdf >> >> Their space was hijacked and announced facing Yahoo. I’m hoping that >> Yahoo is now feeding public route views services as a method to help >> with detection. Same goes for Microsoft and Google and other e-mail >> providers. Some sunlight here would help avoid similar localized hijacks. >> >>> And if someone want to make me a transit offer for the price of DE-CIX >>> (I do not even ask the price of DTEL-IX peering ;) ) - please, contact >>> me off-list, I will be really happy. >> >> Pricing obviously varies based on location and a few other criteria, but >> you should be shopping if this is a major part of your business. >> >> - Jared >>
