The firewall mailing lists tend to be pretty dead now a days.
Your best bet is probably writing a python script to convert the
rules/objects over. You may have some luck asking the vendors professional
services group to do it. Depending on the size of the order perhaps you can
toss it in or just a
On 19/Apr/16 06:07, Sean Kennedy wrote:
> NANOG,
>
> I realize that every SP handles marking and queueing/scheduling
> differently, but I am curious to see other provider's 'standard'
> config for QoS that is deployed on the JunOS platform. What config do
> apply to all your ingress interfaces
Hi list,
Could any one recommend any firewall related mailing lists?
Looking for options on converting a large amount of Fortinet rules to
Checkpoint. Ultimately converting the entire configuration to Checkpoint
would be nice.
Thank you for any advice you can provide.
Respectfully,
Ed
Dan,
I think that you mean that AT&T is the 1-800 pound gorilla. I know engineers
at AT&T that are bitter about that whole arrangement this many years on.
I miss the glory days of everyone and their uncle spinning up a CLEC in the
mid-90's. It made the ordering process complicated, especially
On 04/22/2016 12:31 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
Being discussed on outages, too.
Our monitoring system saw access to www.amazon.com and www.cablelabs.com
(over v6) down via HE ... amazon came back up for me via Zayo, but when
www.cablelabs.com came back up, it was on HE. So the same as you.
So I sus
We saw disconnections to Comcast via HE, A subnet was announced with a
bogus path.
-- During the problem --
98.224.0.0/11 via 162.11.22.209 on vlan500 [ibgp_border 12:09:48
from 162.11.22.212] * (100/15) [AS65021i]
Type: BGP unicast univ
BGP.origin: IGP
BGP.as_path: 6939 200759 6
Hi All,
We are experiencing an issue with ACX routers running on 12.3X54-D20.7
where the LDP sessions are continuously flapping, the logs indicate the
following;
Apr 21 03:36:31 hostname rpd[2299]: RPD_LDP_SESSIONDOWN: LDP session
x.x.x.x is down, reason: hold time expired
Apr 21 03:36:34 hostn
On 20/04/16 16:27, Leo Bicknell wrote:
90%+ of the stacks deployed will be too small. Modern Unix generally
has "autotuning" TCP stacks, but I don't think Windows or OS X has
those features yet (but I'd be very happy to be wrong on that point).
Regardless of satellite uplink/downlink speeds, box
Hi Laurent,
We regularly have people run 50-150 person events with everyone sharing a
single external IP and have minimal issues. Our biggest events are League of
Legends tournaments and I believe those are streamed on Twitch. I don't
think you are going to have a problem, but feel free to hit me
Hey Colton,
Comments inline:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Colton Conor
wrote:
> NANOG,
>
> I know Arista is typically a switch manufacturer, but with their recently
> announced Arista 7500R Series and soon to be announced but already shipping
> 7280R Series Arista is officially getting into
Hey Laurent,
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:27 AM, Laurent Dumont
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are running a small-ish LAN event in Toronto where we have to use a
> single IP address to NAT between 250-350 players. I have been made aware of
> possible issues with different services like Steam, Origin and Twit
You can always bring up an HE IPv6 tunnel and hand out public IPs that way.
--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, +1 (360) 474-7474
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Laurent Dumont
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are running a small-ish LAN event in Toronto where we have to use a
> single IP address to NAT be
Colton Conor wrote:
> I know Arista is typically a switch manufacturer, but with their recently
> announced Arista 7500R Series and soon to be announced but already
shipping
> 7280R Series Arista is officially getting into the routing game. The fixed
> 1U 7280R Series looks quite impressive. The 75
NANOG,
I realize that every SP handles marking and queueing/scheduling
differently, but I am curious to see other provider's 'standard' config
for QoS that is deployed on the JunOS platform. What config do apply to
all your ingress interfaces for classification? How are your core link
sched
You should check a log files during the time of high cpu load. ASR9K do most of
the packet processing on NP.
High CPU load may happen during some control plane processing, like bgp
neighbor flapping.
Отправлено с iPhone
> 20 апр. 2016 г., в 2:17, Micah Croff написал(а):
>
> I've experienced s
Dear Nanog Members,
My name is Martin Bacher. I am a Student at UAS Technikum-Wien and I am
currently writing my master’s thesis with topic "Addressing DDoS Attacks with
BGP FlowSpec“.
It would be very helpful for me if some of you could share information about
the following topics:
- Intra-AS
According to some slides from a russian cisco connect event, the upcoming
small-size
NCS 5501 and NCS 5502 will support 1M+ FIB and 50ms per port buffers.
Seem to be killer boxes. 48x100GE in 2RU with large FIB & buffers? Loving it
already.
I wonder what prices will look like for those.
With Go
>
> > High Touch / Low Touch
>
> High touch means very general purpose NPU, with off-chip memory. Low
> touch means usually ASIC or otherwise simplified pipeline and on-chip
> memory. Granted Jericho can support off-chip memory too.
>
> L3 switches are canonical example of low touch. EZchip, Trio,
On 24 April 2016 at 09:08, Colton Conor wrote:
Hey,
> I guess you are right the QFX10002-36Q is probably a better comparison. But
> let's be honest, Juniper is not going to sell a QFX10002-36Q for less than
> $20k like Arista will do for a semi- similar box. Even with a high discount
> (like 90
Saku,
I guess you are right the QFX10002-36Q is probably a better comparison. But
let's be honest, Juniper is not going to sell a QFX10002-36Q for less than
$20k like Arista will do for a semi- similar box. Even with a high discount
(like 90 percent off list), the Juniper QFX10002-36Q at $360k lis
Got it, thanks for the explanation!
> -Original Message-
> From: Saku Ytti [mailto:s...@ytti.fi]
> Sent: Sunday, 24 April, 2016 11:03
> To: Keith Medcalf
> Cc: nanog list
> Subject: Re: Arista Routing Solutions
>
> On 24 April 2016 at 05:14, Keith Medcalf wrote:
>
> > High Touch / Low To
On 24 April 2016 at 05:14, Keith Medcalf wrote:
> High Touch / Low Touch
High touch means very general purpose NPU, with off-chip memory. Low
touch means usually ASIC or otherwise simplified pipeline and on-chip
memory. Granted Jericho can support off-chip memory too.
L3 switches are canonical
High Touch / Low Touch
Is this a measure of the amount of fiddle diddling required to get the chip to
work as documented, or is it some other kind of code?
For example a "High Touch" chip needs lots of fiddle farting because it was
designed by a moron and every possible thing that can be progr
23 matches
Mail list logo
