Hi,
We are running a small-ish LAN event in Toronto where we have to use a
single IP address to NAT between 250-350 players. I have been made aware
of possible issues with different services like Steam, Origin and Twitch
who can run into issues when a large number of connections seem to
origi
On 2016-04-20 13:09, Rob Seastrom wrote:
> Going to D3.1 in a meaningful way means migrating to either a mid-split at 85
> MHz or a high split at 200 MHz
Thanks. This is what I expected. But in the past, the canadian cablecos
had argued that removing the 42mhz upstream limitation was a huge
end
ting is owned/run by tucows, who are now also doing a 1Gb (GPON?)
residential single home FTTH project...
http://www.fiercetelecom.com/europe/tags/tucows
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
> Ting's support is the BEST support I've ever had in the IT industry. I
> event ended
Ting's support is the BEST support I've ever had in the IT industry. I
event ended up in a long discussion with one of the reps about custom
roms :P
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> *shrugs* Seems to work here, though if Ting uses T-Mo and Sprint, I suppose
> Ting's more li
*shrugs* Seems to work here, though if Ting uses T-Mo and Sprint, I suppose
Ting's more likely to have a good signal.
I don't expect much support on a $6 mobile wireless service.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http:
Yang,
Thanks. I will check them out.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Yang Yu wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Dovid Bender wrote:
> > Thank you everyone for your feedback. I also wanted to know if any
> > providers offered unlimited 2g since in some cases they want to stream
> back
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Dovid Bender wrote:
> Thank you everyone for your feedback. I also wanted to know if any
> providers offered unlimited 2g since in some cases they want to stream back
> some audio as well.
4gantennashop has T-Mobile business with LTE data and unlimited 2G afterwar
As a 3+ year “customer” of freedom-pop, I agree.
Their IP service was a bargain until the WiMax->LTE migration. Now the service
is useless.
Their technical support continually redefines lack of effort.
On 4/20/16, 11:42 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Owen DeLong" wrote:
>I had horrible experience
Thank you everyone for your feedback. I also wanted to know if any
providers offered unlimited 2g since in some cases they want to stream back
some audio as well.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Dovid Bender wrote:
> A while ago some people mentioned that some US carriers have basic
> internet
I had horrible experience when I tried to use Freedom POP many years ago.
Their customer service is awful and completely uncooperative. Their equipment
did not work well
in my environment at all.
I would not wish them on my worst enemy.
Owen
> On Apr 20, 2016, at 1:35 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Look into Ting if all you want is a backup OOB path:
https://ting.com/rates?ab=1
$6/month per active SIM card. Plus billing for actual data usage. Use it in
your choice of HSPA+/LTE modem equipment. They're an MVNO using, if I
remember right, a combination of T-Mobile and Sprint.
On Wed, Apr 20,
I'd look at FreedomPOP's Netgear 341U. $20 - $50 NRC, single digit MRC for low
usage.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Dovid Bender"
To: "NANOG"
Sent
A while ago some people mentioned that some US carriers have basic internet
plans for backup access to their equipment. A few questions:
1) Do they give you a public IP per connection or do you tunnel back to a
central location and then connect via the tunnel?
2) Which carriers offer this and what
> On Apr 14, 2016, at 10:43 PM, Jean-Francois Mezei
> wrote:
>
> Also, have cablecos with such limits for upstream begun to upgrade the
> cable plant to increase the upstream bandwidth ? Canadian cablecos have
> told the regulator it would be prohibitively expensive to do so, but
> incumbents t
Great explanation!
Remember that LECs (Local Exchange Carrier, CenturyLink, Verizon, etc.)
typically get to decide how this all works...
ATT is still an 800 pound gorilla and a couple years ago stopped ALL
payments to CLECs (Competitive Local Exchange Carrier, buy wholesale
from LECs), took th
Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
> 1460 byte payloads down, maybe 64 byte acks on the return, and with SACK
> which is widely deployed an ACK every 2-4 packets. You would see about
> 2,140 packets/sec downstream (25Mbps/1460), and perhaps send 1070 ACKs
> back upstream, at 64 bytes each, or about 68Kbps. W
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
Considering a single download TCP connection. I am aware that modern TCP
stacks will rationalize ACKs and send 1 ACK for every x packets
received, thus reducing upload bandwidth requirements. Is this basically
widespread and assumed that everyone
On 4/20/16, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
> Others have already answered with the technical details. Let me take a
> stab at some more, uh, variable items.
[.. snip lots ..]
> 90%+ of the stacks deployed will be too small. Modern Unix generally
> has "autotuning" TCP stacks, but I don't think Windows
Thanks to all for the sanity check.
Always depressing when you think you may have a good argument but after
much reading, you find out you don't :-(
BTW, in case someone knows. With the recent "beam" satellites having a
lot of different focused antennas, how does the uplink work ?
Does all traff
>> For the most part, “long distance” calls within the US are a thing of the
>> past and at least one mobile carrier now treats US/CA/MX as a single
>> local calling area
>
>Is this a case of telcos having switched to IP trunks and can reach
>other carriers for "free"
No, it's because fiber bandw
> On Apr 20, 2016, at 7:59 AM, Jean-Francois Mezei
> wrote:
>
> On 2016-04-20 10:52, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>> For the most part, “long distance” calls within the US are a thing of the
>> past and at least one mobile carrier now treats US/CA/MX as a single
>> local calling area
>
>
> Is this
On 4/19/16, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
> As part of the ongoing CRTC hearings, the incumbents' claim that
> continued implementation of the current 5/1 standard would make Canada a
> world leader for broadband in the future.
>
> A satellite company who currently can't even deliver its advertised 5
On 2016-04-20 10:52, Owen DeLong wrote:
> For the most part, “long distance” calls within the US are a thing of the
> past and at least one mobile carrier now treats US/CA/MX as a single
> local calling area
Is this a case of telcos having switched to IP trunks and can reach
other carriers for
> On Apr 15, 2016, at 2:21 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>
> In message , David Barak
> writes
> :
>>> On Apr 15, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>>
>>> Australia is about the area as the US and has always had caller
>>> pays and seperate area codes for mobiles.
>>
>> Australia has fewer
NANOG,
I know Arista is typically a switch manufacturer, but with their recently
announced Arista 7500R Series and soon to be announced but already shipping
7280R Series Arista is officially getting into the routing game. The fixed
1U 7280R Series looks quite impressive. The 7500R series is your
t
Others have already answered with the technical details. Let me take a
stab at some more, uh, variable items.
In a message written on Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:29:12PM -0400, Jean-Francois
Mezei wrote:
> Also, when you establish a TCP connection, do most stacks have a default
> window size that
This document (BRKARC-2017) turned out to be very useful to determine the
possible root-cause. The utilization of the spp and netio processes
increase if the router/line-card is software switching traffic, in our case
ICMP. We will test the policing feature and implement it.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016
27 matches
Mail list logo
