On 4/14/2016 16:01, John Levine wrote:
OK, let us suppose I want to be a law biding, up right American and use
only a cellphone for the "right" area.
I drive a big truck OTR. I usually know what part of which state I am
in, but I frequently do not know which part of what state I will be in
in 2
Canadian cable carriers seem to have all told the CRTC they can only
carry 42mhz in the upstream because their amplifiers and nodes only
amplify that narrow band in the upstream direction.
Is/was 42mhz common across north america ?
In a typical installation, how much of the 42mhz is actually usa
On 4/13/16 6:25 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
You *do* realize that the woman in the McDonald's case got *third degree*
burns and required skin grafts, right? Water at 180F is hot enough to
burn you - we even have a word for it: scalding. And unlike sipping too-hot
coffee, where you can s
You do realize that this is the exact kind of thing that caused this discussion
in the first place. I'm well familiar with that case. I was talking about my
own experiences in the food service industry, but of course you barely read a
sentence and set on a war path accusing me of not checking my
--- j...@kyneticwifi.com wrote:
From: Josh Reynolds
Is NANOG really the best place for this discussion?
--
Filter it out.
scott
> On Apr 14, 2016, at 14:01 , John Levine wrote:
>
>> OK, let us suppose I want to be a law biding, up right American and use
>> only a cellphone for the "right" area.
>>
>> I drive a big truck OTR. I usually know what part of which state I am
>> in, but I frequently do not know which part o
> On Apr 14, 2016, at 13:14 , Larry Sheldon wrote:
>
> On 4/14/2016 12:09, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 14, 2016, at 05:46 , John Levine wrote:
>>>
If they're land lines, the NPA/NXX will be local to the CO so you won't
have out-of-area numbers other than a rare corner case of a
[ Apologies if you saw this elsewhere already - jtk ]
Friends, colleagues, fellow operators,
The network security track, formerly known as the ISP security BoF,
may be on the agenda at NANOG 67 in Chicago and if we can put together a
reasonable agenda I may be your track facilitator.
We not only
>OK, let us suppose I want to be a law biding, up right American and use
>only a cellphone for the "right" area.
>
>I drive a big truck OTR. I usually know what part of which state I am
>in, but I frequently do not know which part of what state I will be in
>in 24 hours.
>
>What should I do?
A
On 4/14/2016 15:10, Larry Sheldon wrote:
We wrote off a lot of revenue on calls that involved a company (if I
remembered the name I still would not repeat it--ditto its location)
which turn out to be pretty much one man who like to sell and install
mobile radio telephone stations. And, it turns
On 2016-04-14 16:14, Larry Sheldon wrote:
> Quick question: What happens (in the purely hypothetical case, I
> sincerely hope) if the building is on fire and it turns out that the
> VOIP-phone is the only one that works?
VOIP:
Not purely theoretical situation. 911 where I live would take ab
On 4/14/2016 12:09, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Apr 14, 2016, at 05:46 , John Levine wrote:
If they're land lines, the NPA/NXX will be local to the CO so you won't
have out-of-area numbers other than a rare corner case of a very
expensive foreign exchange line. If they're VoIP lines, the address i
On 4/14/2016 10:45, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
.
So maybe 10% of all cell phones are primarly used in the "wrong" area?
Obligatory xkcd ref: https://xkcd.com/1129/
I am reminded of incidents many years ago when I worked in a Revenue
Acc
On 4/14/2016 10:32, Leo Bicknell wrote:
In a message written on Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:29:39AM -, John Levine
wrote:
The people on nanog are not typical. I looked around for statistics
and didn't find much, but it looks like only a few percent of numbers
are ported each month, and it's of
Page Not Found
Link wasn't copied correctly, the "consumer-privacy" bit was cut off.
Here's the working link:
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-releases-proposed-rules-protect-broadband-consumer-privacy
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Livingood, Jason
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Livingood, Jason wrote:
I have not yet read all of the 147 pages of the FCC Privacy NPRM -
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-releases-proposed-rules-protect-broadband-
consumer-privacy. But it may be worth noting, especially for this
audience, that the FCC proposes considering
Since then, I’ve been pretty much satisfied with my service from callcentric
and the price is right.
That's who I use. Now there's just a box on the web site to say not in
the US.
R's,
John
> On Apr 14, 2016, at 05:46 , John Levine wrote:
>
>> If they're land lines, the NPA/NXX will be local to the CO so you won't
>> have out-of-area numbers other than a rare corner case of a very
>> expensive foreign exchange line. If they're VoIP lines, the address is
>> *supposed* to be so re
All,
Is NANOG really the best place for this discussion?
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> .
>> So maybe 10% of all cell phones are primarly used in the "wrong" area?
>
> Obligatory xkcd ref: https://xkcd.com/1
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
.
> So maybe 10% of all cell phones are primarly used in the "wrong" area?
Obligatory xkcd ref: https://xkcd.com/1129/
In a message written on Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:29:39AM -, John Levine
wrote:
> The people on nanog are not typical. I looked around for statistics
> and didn't find much, but it looks like only a few percent of numbers
> are ported each month, and it's often the same numbers being ported
> r
I have not yet read all of the 147 pages of the FCC Privacy NPRM -
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-releases-proposed-rules-protect-broadband-
consumer-privacy. But it may be worth noting, especially for this
audience, that the FCC proposes considering things like IP addresses and
geo-location info
"If they're land lines, the NPA/NXX will be local to the CO so you won't
have out-of-area numbers other than a rare corner case of a very expensive
foreign exchange line."
This hasn't been a true statement since Local Number Portability. NPA/NXX
is nothing more than 'where the number originally w
On 2016-04-14 14:29, Robert Kisteleki wrote:
> On 2016-04-14 13:30, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
>> Hello everyone
>>
>>
>> I wonder if it's just me or anyone else also finding issues in g root
>> reachability?
>>
>>
>> ICMP, trace, UDP DNS queries all timing out. Only TCP seem to work.
>
>
> It's not on
>If they're land lines, the NPA/NXX will be local to the CO so you won't
>have out-of-area numbers other than a rare corner case of a very
>expensive foreign exchange line. If they're VoIP lines, the address is
>*supposed* to be so registered, but softphones and even VoIP handsets
>tend to move
Thanks to all who responded (and thanks to the NANOGger who provided me
with images).
I am a bit disappointed that others have also had the silent treatment
after signing up to download vMX.
I am unsurprised that vMX 14.x has had teething troubles. I also hope
JNPR listen to us that Intel ar
On 2016-04-14 13:30, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
>
> I wonder if it's just me or anyone else also finding issues in g root
> reachability?
>
>
> ICMP, trace, UDP DNS queries all timing out. Only TCP seem to work.
It's not only you:
https://atlas.ripe.net/dnsmon/?dnsmon.session.co
I'm see the same thing from multiple networks.
$ dig NS . @g.root-servers.net
; <<>> DiG 9.9.5 <<>> NS . @g.root-servers.net
;; global options: +cmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 7:30 AM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
>
> I wonder if it'
Hello everyone
I wonder if it's just me or anyone else also finding issues in g root
reachability?
ICMP, trace, UDP DNS queries all timing out. Only TCP seem to work.
Trace is timing out on 208.46.37.38.
traceroute to 192.112.36.4 (192.112.36.4), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 router01.h
29 matches
Mail list logo
