Dear Nanog'er,
Anybody using NX-OS on MPLS LSR and/or Edge-LSR ?
We are evaluating the replacement of 7600 LSR routers. Our natural
carrier/ISP choice would go for XR everywhere, but we are also curious
about NX-OS on the core.
Why not NX-OS for LSR and XR for Edge-LSR ?
Thank,
-Marcel
On 10/20/2015 07:55 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Right now imap.gmail.com appears down for me from at least two local
networks in India, just saying
I guess that's what the original poster wanted to ask about.
From time to time, I see outages of IMAP at Google, but they don't last
long.
Sorry about this... got confused earlier :/
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
Original Message
From: Christopher Morrow
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 11:02 AM
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Google IMAP
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Suresh Ramasubraman
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian
wrote:
> Right now imap.gmail.com appears down for me from at least two local
> networks in India, just saying
>
deets or it didn't happen...
$ telnet -4 imap.gmail.com 993
Trying 173.194.219.109...
Connected to gmail-imap.l.google.com.
Es
Right now imap.gmail.com appears down for me from at least two local
networks in India, just saying
I guess that's what the original poster wanted to ask about.
On Wednesday, October 21, 2015, Jason Hellenthal
wrote:
> $ dig @8.8.8.8 imap.gmail.com
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3 <<>> @8.8.8.8 imap.gmail
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Stanislaw Datskevich wrote:
> Thanks, Snabb Switch's packetblaster seems to be what I am looking for.
> My goal using it is to find out how much of real users traffic my new
> softrouter can handle until it begin doing packet drops.
>
I would recommend Trex with
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Uta Meier-Hahn wrote:
> Dear networkers in North America,
>
> Internet interconnection is largely unregulated. However, in some
> countries, public regulation has emerged – be it through transparency
> rules, mandatory peering or licensing terms.
>
> Currently, w
Dear networkers in North America,
Internet interconnection is largely unregulated. However, in some countries,
public regulation has emerged – be it through transparency rules, mandatory
peering or licensing terms.
Currently, we lack an overview about where regulation exists and we know little
$ dig @8.8.8.8 imap.gmail.com
; <<>> DiG 9.10.3 <<>> @8.8.8.8 imap.gmail.com
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 49149
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 3, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: versi
Incoming settings
IMAP server: imap.gmail.com
Port: 993
Security type: SSL (always)
Outgoing settings
SMTP server: smtp.gmail.com
Port: 465
Security type: SSL (always)
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;imap.gmail.com.IN A
;; ANSWER SECTION:
imap.gmail.com. 299 IN
Any GMail / Google Apps guys here? Just want to ask if there are issues
with imap.google.com
; <<>> DiG 9 <<>> @localhost imap.google.com A
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 24131
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSW
In message <56263d2f.5000...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>, Masataka Ohta writes:
> Max Tulyev wrote:
>
> > On our network, we had to spent times more money in people than in hardware.
>
> Certainly.
>
> > Customer support, especially network troubleshootings and so on...
>
> Customer support fo
On 10/19/2015 09:46 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
On 19/Oct/15 18:27, Mike wrote:
Thats a good question. I would need to move some things around in my
network in order to test it, not sure if I have the resources at the
moment but I'll keep it in mind.
Well, the switch facing the 7201 is also an ME
>WAIT A MINUTE! "CBL" is not "Spamhaus", is it?!
>
>http://www.abuseat.org/
Yes, it is. Informally it was for a very long time via the Spamhaus
XBL. Now it's explicit.
There's not much practical difference, and the same people are running
it.
R's,
John
Max Tulyev wrote:
> On our network, we had to spent times more money in people than in hardware.
Certainly.
> Customer support, especially network troubleshootings and so on...
Customer support for IPv6 costs a lot, at least because of:
1) Unnecessarily lengthy IP addresses, not recognized
> I bet most money is spent on hiring software developers to change/review all
> BSS/NSS systems to adopt to IPv6 ;)
You should hire a consultant who can then push the software developers to hire
people to change/review [..etc..] ;-)
Cheers,
Sander
I bet most money is spent on hiring software developers to change/review
all BSS/NSS systems to adopt to IPv6 ;)
Op 13-10-2015 om 13:11 schreef Paul S.:
Anyone in a network administrator position struggling with IPv6 (and
not willing to fix that out of their own initiative) has no business
run
On 20 October 2015 at 01:42, Chip Marshall wrote:
Hey,
> See page 4 on the spec sheet:
> http://www.juniper.net/assets/us/en/local/pdf/datasheets/1000531-en.pdf
>
> No idea what's involved with packaging the VM and getting it there, but
> should open up some interesting possibilties.
What are t
> If not to solve problems or as a technical resource, what is the NANOG
> for?
to tell other people how to run their networks and what they should and
should not post on the list
Check out TREX;
https://github.com/cisco-system-traffic-generator/trex-core
Cheers,
James.
20 matches
Mail list logo
