Those are measured at the campus boundary. I don't have visibility inside
the school's network to know who much intra-campus traffic there may be .
but we know that peer-to-peer is a small percentage of overall Internet
traffic flows, and streaming video remains the largets.
Frank
From: Ja
On 21/Apr/15 19:37, Max Tulyev wrote:
> That's generally good idea, but average TCP session speed depends not
> only your side of connection, but another side as well.
It was always best effort :-).
Mark.
This issue has now been resolved.
Cheers
Marla
Frontier Communications
-Original Message-
From: Randy Bush [mailto:ra...@psg.com]
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 11:48 AM
To: Azinger, Marla
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Re: dns on fios/frontier
> Looking into this an
That's generally good idea, but average TCP session speed depends not
only your side of connection, but another side as well.
On 18.04.15 07:58, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 17/Apr/15 15:05, Max Tulyev wrote:
>> One more interesting thing.
>>
>> If you buy IP transit, mostly you are paying by exac
On 21/Apr/15 11:58, Max Tulyev wrote:
> Choose another IX to peer. Or even make your own ;)
>
> Kiev have 3 major IXes, and price is about $100 for 10GE port.
Switch port costs will be governed by how the exchange point is run.
Low or no running costs will, theoretically, yield cheaper ports.
Choose another IX to peer. Or even make your own ;)
Kiev have 3 major IXes, and price is about $100 for 10GE port.
On 19.04.15 12:23, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
> So why is IX peering so expensive?
>
> Again if I look at my local IX (dix.dk) they have about 40 networks
> connected. Each network pays
6 matches
Mail list logo
