On 10/15/2014 23:42, Rodney Joffe wrote:
https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2468.txt
I posted this to Facebook a while ago:
From NANOG
Subject: Sigh. 16 years ago today.
https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2468.txt
[Ed. note: The man being remembered was important, and in ways, still
is. But I mention i
why i dread october: jon, abha, itojun
https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2468.txt
This all becomes even more complicated when some traffic isn't counted
(Eg. "free facebook") on a given service which generally then
necessitates the need for some level of flow-based accounting, even if
it's just collecting flows for the free traffic to subtract from the
port counters. I can s
IPDR under DOCSIS and generally RADIUS or TACACS(+) for DSL. Unclear
personally about fiber/FiOS deployments (never been near enough to know)
Flow (sflow, nflow, ipfix, etc) generally doesn't scale and is woefully
inaccurate.
On Wednesday, October 15, 2014, Colton Conor wrote:
> I see in past n
>
>
> On 10/15/14, 1:38 PM, "Colton Conor" wrote:
>
> >So based on the response I have received so far it seems cable was a
> >complicated example with service flows involved.
>
Don't forget that between your port on your DSL/Cable modem and the actual
port they may be monitoring there could be t
There are lots of ways to do it. Cable uses IPDR, which is baked into
DOCSIS standards.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Protocol_Detail_Record
On 10/15/14, 1:38 PM, "Colton Conor" wrote:
>So based on the response I have received so far it seems cable was a
>complicated example with serv
You may want to start learning more at
http://www.netforecast.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/NFR5116_Comcast_Meter_Accuracy_Report.pdf.
This report is written by Netforecast – the same firm interviewed by GigaOm in
the story link you provided.
Their first audit was in 2009:
http://www.netforec
Okay. This appears to be Network based filters.
We cannot connect from networks in 104/8, 158/8, or 107/8.
We are able to connect using the provider IP Address on the border
routers. We also had an upstream test from 199/8 and they were successful.
I've already sent emails to the whois contac
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
> So based on the response I have received so far it seems cable was a
> complicated example with service flows involved. What if we are talking
> about something simpler like keeping track of how much data flows in and
> out of a port on a swi
So based on the response I have received so far it seems cable was a
complicated example with service flows involved. What if we are talking
about something simpler like keeping track of how much data flows in and
out of a port on a switch in a given month? I know you can use SNMP, but I
believe th
Folks, use sflow with rrdtool!
Quite awesome & handy
On 15/10/2014 20:14, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 13:06:56 -0500, Colton Conor said:
>
>> on a cisco switch vs a DSL port on a DSLAM for example? I would think these
>> access switches would have some sort of stat you c
I have 5 telephone companies that cannot reach it. :(
jack
On 10/15/2014 1:22 PM, Spencer Gaw wrote:
No issues here coming from Level 3, CenturyLink, Mammoth, or Comcast.
Able to telnet to pop.verizon.net on 995 and smtp.verizon.net on 465.
Regards,
SG
On 10/15/2014 11:55 AM, Jack Bates wro
No issues here coming from Level 3, CenturyLink, Mammoth, or Comcast.
Able to telnet to pop.verizon.net on 995 and smtp.verizon.net on 465.
Regards,
SG
On 10/15/2014 11:55 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
I have a customer that left Verizon FIOS when he moved but kept his
email address. About a month ag
> On Oct 15, 2014, at 2:14 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 13:06:56 -0500, Colton Conor said:
>
>> on a cisco switch vs a DSL port on a DSLAM for example? I would think these
>> access switches would have some sort of stat you can count similar to a
>> utility meter re
Good luck.
Let me know if you find anybody with a clue over there.
Last week we took over ZoneEdit (DNS Provider + mail forwarding) and
they started blocking the new ZoneEdit mail forwarders within a couple
hours of go-live - almost certainly it's some statistical based block
because of the sudde
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 13:06:56 -0500, Colton Conor said:
> on a cisco switch vs a DSL port on a DSLAM for example? I would think these
> access switches would have some sort of stat you can count similar to a
> utility meter reader on a house. See what it was at last month, see what is
> is at this
I see in past news articles that cable companies are inaccurately
calculating customers data usage for their online GB of usage per month. My
question is how do you properly determine how much traffic in bytes a port
passes per month? Is it different if we are talking about an ethernet port
on a ci
I have a customer that left Verizon FIOS when he moved but kept his
email address. About a month ago, he says his pop3 quit connecting. I've
tested the ports he's using and notice they aren't responding. He's
tried helpdesk and they sent him to the abuse whitelist. He tried the
abuse@, which of
We have been using the VeEX UX400 platform. It has a portable and
rack-mount version, we have the portable so I can't comment on the
rack-mount variant. We found the price/feature set to be better than
several other vendors that we evaluated. We've had the equipment for
several months now an
Is there any plan of making the netalyzer open source , and if it is
already open source please provide the link so we could use it
Thanks
-Aslam
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> Is spiffy... but any chance that you could add testing for intermediate
> carrier BCP 38 com
21 matches
Mail list logo
