On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:08:04 +0300, Hank Nussbacher said:
> We went with 768 - enough time to replace the routers with ASR9010s. It is
> merely a stop-gap measure to give everyone time to replace their routers in
> an orderly fashion.
The same people who, knowing the 6509 had this default config
At 18:10 12/08/2014 -0400, William Herrin wrote:
We went with 768 - enough time to replace the routers with ASR9010s. It is
merely a stop-gap measure to give everyone time to replace their routers in
an orderly fashion.
-Hank
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>
htt
From: Matthew Petach
>Unless you guys are miraculously managing to terminate
>
>Nx100G bundles into 6509s with Sup2 or sup3s, I would
>be really, really surprised if this even made it on your
>radar. Chalk it up to poorly-researched reporting.
>
>
>And if you *are* handling Nx100G bundles on 65
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Matthew Petach wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 5:06 PM, McElearney, Kevin <
kevin_mcelear...@cable.comcast.com> wrote:
http://www.zdnet.com/internet-hiccups-today-youre-not-alone-heres-why-7
32566/
"According to NANOG, and complaints tracker DownDetector, many Internet
"Toney Mareo" writes:
> Hello
>
> I think it's kind of an isp secret but I would be curious how do
> people distribute modems to pools before they would even reach the
> actual IP network so on layer2:
>
> http://dl.packetstormsecurity.net/papers/evaluation/docsis/Service_Distribution.jpg
Nobod
On Wednesday, August 13, 2014, wrote:
> 2014-08-12 15:06, me wrote:
>
>> Ran across this paper the other day and didn't know how big a problem
>> it was. Looks like Eduardo's post confirms it.
>>
>> http://www.rainbowtech.net/products/docs/c51ce4107047eb1b2dc/Ants%20in%
>> 20OSP%20Equipment.pdf.
Denis Fondras writes:
> May we discuss IPv6 support ? Last time I checked, UBNT was lagging
> behind...
I've been running an IPv6 tunnel ( FIOS) with one end being
Mikrotik and the other being UBNT (ER-Lite) since January 2013. The
UBNT is in a fairly simple-minded configuration so I can't spe
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 5:06 PM, McElearney, Kevin <
kevin_mcelear...@cable.comcast.com> wrote:
> http://www.zdnet.com/internet-hiccups-today-youre-not-alone-heres-why-7
> 32566/
>
> "According to NANOG, and complaints tracker DownDetector, many Internet
> providers — including Comcast, Level3
http://www.zdnet.com/internet-hiccups-today-youre-not-alone-heres-why-7
32566/
"According to NANOG, and complaints tracker DownDetector, many Internet
providers — including Comcast, Level3, AT&T, Cogent, Sprint, Verizon, and
others — have suffered from serious performance problems at various t
On 12/08/14 23:10, William Herrin wrote:
> I note that the recommended command in that article, "mls cef
> maximum-routes ip 1000", will throw most of your IPv6 routes out of
> the TCAM instead. Which if you have any IPv6 traffic of substance just
> kills you in the other direction. Might want to t
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/catalyst-6500-series-switches/117712-problemsolution-cat6500-00.html
I note that the recommended command in that article, "mls cef
maximum-routes ip 1000", will throw most of your IPv6 rou
On Aug 12, 2014, at 1:02 PM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> Many don't need to buy anything new. Just follow the instructions here:
> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/catalyst-6500-series-switche$
> We did this in the 1st week of June. Problem solved.
s/Problem solved/Critical lim
On 2014-08-12 15:06, me wrote:
Ran across this paper the other day and didn't know how big a problem
it was. Looks like Eduardo's post confirms it.
http://www.rainbowtech.net/products/docs/c51ce4107047eb1b2dc/Ants%20in%20OSP%20Equipment.pdf.pdf
Now that is fascinating. I like how they reprodu
Hi,
Currently experiencing trouble with BGP session between 49463 and 3549.
Relevant router: cdg2.gblx.net
Can you please contact me off-list for resolution ?
Thanks
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> Do folks just hack up HEPA filters or something?
I've had decent luck with window air conditioner filters available at
your local home despot. Trim to size with scissors. Periodically
replace.
HEPA they are not, but they'll keep out the wor
Ran across this paper the other day and didn't know how big a problem it
was. Looks like Eduardo's post confirms it.
http://www.rainbowtech.net/products/docs/c51ce4107047eb1b2dc/Ants%20in%20OSP%20Equipment.pdf.pdf
--John
On 08/12/2014 12:52 PM, Eduardo A. Suárez wrote:
Hi,
it's not a joke. H
On 8/12/2014 at 2:59 PM Tom Morris wrote:
|Terro is my go-to for that... it's basically boric acid mixed with a
sugar
|solution. The ants eat it and perish. It's the only thing I've found
that
|works on the infamous Crazy Rasberry Ants that like to eat
electrical
|panels.
=
In case
On Aug 12, 2014, at 3:22 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 08/12/2014 11:19 AM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm interested in knowing what sorts of material folks use to make
>> after-market dust filters for their various devices which wouldn't normally
>> have any. This seems to almost be a
On Aug 12, 2014, at 3:09 PM, Tom Morris wrote:
> One important question: how often is the equipment accessed for maintenance?
Who knows :) Maybe it becomes someone's full time job to go do regular checks
and maintenances of every POP? Maybe after an appropriate filter is found, a
relatively
+1 for CO2 (But stand way back as they will go everywhere)
+1 for moth balls in the enclosure (esp prophylactically)
+1 for boric acid mixed with molasses (use externally) Also stops carpenter
ants in poles.)
Tom
On Aug 12, 2014, at 3:07 PM, Robert Glover wrote:
> On 8/12/2014 11:52 AM, Eduard
On 08/12/2014 11:19 AM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
Hi,
I'm interested in knowing what sorts of material folks use to make after-market
dust filters for their various devices which wouldn't normally have any. This
seems to almost be a necessity when these kinds of devices are deployed in
environmen
One important question: how often is the equipment accessed for maintenance?
I've had reasonably good luck with air filter media coated with a
tackifier, similar to the Dustlok media here
http://www.filtersales.com/pagout.htm?id=Pad%20Media
It seems like what happens with it is heavier airborne fi
On 8/12/2014 11:52 AM, Eduardo A. Suárez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it's not a joke. Here we have a fire ants nest in the fiber patch panel.
> Are there any DIY ways to manage that?
>
> Thanks, Eduardo.-
>
Shop vac?
Freeze it with a CO2 extinguisher then clean it out and re-seal the
enclosure. You may want to consider a small open dish of repellant/killer in
the enclosure in case they get in again
:-)
Aaron D. Osgood
Streamline Solutions L.L.C
274 E. Eau Gallie Blvd. #336
Indian Harbour Beach, FL 3293
I've used mothballs* in outside enclosures each spring, but I've never had a
full blown nest in an enclosure.Fireants are hard to kill, but they will
move their nest.
* naphthalene, para-dichlorobenzene, p-dichlorobenzene, pDCB, or PDB
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-b
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 15:52:45 -0300, "Eduardo A. Su?rez" said:
> it's not a joke. Here we have a fire ants nest in the fiber patch panel.
> Are there any DIY ways to manage that?
Does the local zoo have an aardvark they're willing to loan you? :)
This might be a tad difficult to deal with, as the
Terro is my go-to for that... it's basically boric acid mixed with a sugar
solution. The ants eat it and perish. It's the only thing I've found that
works on the infamous Crazy Rasberry Ants that like to eat electrical
panels.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Eduardo A. Suárez <
esua...@fcaglp.fc
Hi,
it's not a joke. Here we have a fire ants nest in the fiber patch panel.
Are there any DIY ways to manage that?
Thanks, Eduardo.-
--
Eduardo A. Suarez
Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas - UNLP
FCAG: (0221)-4236593 int. 172/Cel: (0221)-15-4557542/Casa: (0221)-4526589
--
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/catalyst-6500-series-switches/117712-problemsolution-cat6500-00.html
-Hank
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Many don't need to buy anything new. Just follow the instructions here:
Hi,
I'm interested in knowing what sorts of material folks use to make after-market
dust filters for their various devices which wouldn't normally have any. This
seems to almost be a necessity when these kinds of devices are deployed in
environments that are overly dusty and dirty (it should a
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Toney Mareo wrote:
> Hello
>
> I think it's kind of an isp secret but I would be curious how do peopl
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Many don't need to buy anything new. Just follow the instructions here:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/catalyst-6500-series-switche$
We did this in the 1st week of June. Problem solved.
-Hank
512K routes, here we come.
On 2014-08-12 09:23, Toney Mareo wrote:
Hello
I think it's kind of an isp secret but I would be curious how do
people distribute modems to pools before they would even reach the
actual IP network so on layer2:
http://dl.packetstormsecurity.net/papers/evaluation/docsis/Service_Distribution.jpg
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
> I am interested to hear opinions on Mikrotik and Ubiquiti Networks routing
> and switching products. I know both hardware providers are widely deployed
> in WISP networks, but I am less interested in their wireless solutions and
> more in thei
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Denis Fondras wrote:
> Le 12/08/2014 17:15, Justin Wilson a écrit :
> > Another thing to consider is how you feel about the configuration.
> > Mikrotik has a more polished GUI and command subset. UBNT is still
> > working things out. A lot of what you have
Le 12/08/2014 17:15, Justin Wilson a écrit :
> Another thing to consider is how you feel about the configuration.
> Mikrotik has a more polished GUI and command subset. UBNT is still
> working things out. A lot of what you have to to do with the UBNT line
> has to still be done in command l
512K routes, here we come. Lots of TCAM based routers suddenly become
really expensive doorstops.
Maybe time to revisit this old 2007 nanog thread?
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/engine?do=post_view_flat;post=99870;page=1;sb=post_latest_reply;so=ASC;mh=25;list=nanog
FYI nanog - https:/
Another thing to consider is how you feel about the configuration.
Mikrotik has a more polished GUI and command subset. UBNT is still
working things out. A lot of what you have to to do with the UBNT line
has to still be done in command line. If you are cool with that then not
a big deal
Hello
I think it's kind of an isp secret but I would be curious how do people
distribute modems to pools before they would even reach the actual IP network
so on layer2:
http://dl.packetstormsecurity.net/papers/evaluation/docsis/Service_Distribution.jpg
For this I would like to get some clari
39 matches
Mail list logo
