Note, if you're the PBX guy somewhere, too, that the +1 844 toll free prefix
was activated at 1200EST today.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Make Election Day a federal holiday: http://wh.gov/lBm94 100k sigs by 12/14
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com
Designer
Possibly related to their mass outage last night around 5:12am CST
(ticket number HD005596458). We're connected at their 427 S La
Salle POP in Chicago.
brandon
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Matthew Crocker
wrote:
>
> On Dec 7, 2013, at 3:40 PM, Jason Canady wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately Cogen
On Dec 7, 2013, at 3:40 PM, Jason Canady wrote:
> Unfortunately Cogent has a lot of peering issues. We use them in our network
> blend and we have been having lots of problems with traffic outbound to
> Comcast. It looks like from South Bend, Indiana on Cogent to Chicago / Level
> 3 we are
Honestly from the Internet Health Report, I've noticed connections between
Level3 and Cogent are red quite a bit.
http://www.internethealthreport.com/
Bad samples or peering issues could be the cause either way, but it's been
ongoing for awhile.
Sincerely,
Eric Tykwinski
TrueNet, Inc.
P: 610-4
Unfortunately Cogent has a lot of peering issues. We use them in our
network blend and we have been having lots of problems with traffic
outbound to Comcast. It looks like from South Bend, Indiana on Cogent
to Chicago / Level 3 we are getting a very tiny amount of packet loss
and a higher tha
Anyone seeing issues between Cogent & Level3 in NYC?
I have Sprint & Cogent for bandwidth. Everything has been humming along for a
couple years just fine. Yesterday around 8:00AM my BGP session with Cogent
flapped. Now, when my Cogent BGP is up I get 100% packet loss in level3 land.
When
On Dec 6, 2013, at 2:57 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 01:05:54PM -0500,
> Jared Mauch wrote
> a message of 36 lines which said:
>
>> I've detected 11.6 million of these events since 2008 just looking at the
>> route-views data. Most recently the past two days 701 h
*Has a Rick Perry "Oops." moment*.
Thanks, Jared.
..Again. :)
-j
Original Message -
> From: "Christopher Morrow"
> > MPLS != Encryption. MPLS VPN = "Stick a label before the still
> > unencrypted IP packet".
>
> great, now how do I get a private link?
>
> > MPLS doesn't secure your data, you are responsible for keeping it
> > secure on the wire.
>
Jamie, methinks you are confusing 2002 with 2001
Jared Mauch
> On Dec 7, 2013, at 11:26 AM, jamie rishaw wrote:
>
> (A little late but) it's reachable for me -- Funny tho that something at
> cisco is IPv6 via a v4<->v6 (2001::) :-)
>
> jamie
>
>
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Gerain
On Dec 7, 2013, at 8:26 AM, jamie rishaw wrote:
> (A little late but) it's reachable for me -- Funny tho that something at
> cisco is IPv6 via a v4<->v6 (2001::) :-)
>
> jamie
Huh?
2001:4800::/29 is owned by Rackspace. It's native all the way from "here"
anyway.
Mike
(A little late but) it's reachable for me -- Funny tho that something at
cisco is IPv6 via a v4<->v6 (2001::) :-)
jamie
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Geraint Jones wrote:
> Its the reason deduplication makes the storage savings it does :)
> --
> Geraint Jones
>
>
>
>
> On 6/12/13 2:52 pm, "
12 matches
Mail list logo
