If you're looking to hire someone to fix your asterisk install, your
best bet would be the Asterisk User or Asterisk Business list.
http://www.asterisk.org/community/discuss
If this is an 0-day type scenario, you'd probably want to reach out to
Digium directly.
Can you expand a bit more on the d
Hi all,
This isn't a NANOG problem, but I'm out of my league on this and am wondering
if anyone can contact me off-list or point me in a direction if they can help
me resolve an expensive exploit against a branch office asterisk box.
Thanks,
Steve
--
Steve Bertrand
AMAYA | Senior Network & Sy
Sasa
Sakura internet,datacentor provider of JAPAN,is providing 6rd BR(ASR1K),IPv6
internet and 6rd configuration information for their customer.
We published the information as informational draft.
Debian 6.0's linux kernel is 2.6.32.So you might need upgrade kernel.
Basically information is 6rd C
Folks,
Regions Bank, a large US bank, had a DNS issue today.As a result,
some RRs ended up pointing at the wrong place with 48 hour TTLs and
customers can't access online banking.
If you manage caching nameserver infrastructure for consumer or
business Internet users, the bank would be gratef
hello all,
can someone please share any info regarding a ipv6 6rd BR setup on linux
(debian specific preferably)... goo.gl search didn't turn up much...
thanks!
--
Pozdrav,--
Sasa Ristic
Department for network
Senior network administrator
VeratNet
37 Vojvode Misica Boulevard, Belgrade, Serb
"John Levine" writes:
> The public suffix list contains points in the DNS where (roughly
> speaking) names below that point are under different management from
> each other and from that name. It's here: http://publicsuffix.org/
>
> The idea is that abc.foo.com and xyz.foo.com have the same man
They'd really like to have a process which is less ad-hoc. For
example, it'd be great if these points were annotated in the DNS
itself, perhaps with a record which points to the corresponding
whois server.
I've been thinking about a way to do that, but I want to understand the
use cases first.
Still getting redirected
Resolving www.google.com... 2607:f8b0:400c:c04::69, 74.125.26.104,
74.125.26.99, ...
Connecting to www.google.com|2607:f8b0:400c:c04::69|:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Found
Location:
http://www.google.com.hk/url?sa=p&hl=zh-CN&pref=hkredire
On Apr 15, 2013, at 9:30 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
> [...]
> If you need the mechanism to work (...) then I can see why fetching and
> caching a browser list over SSL (and perhaps shipping with a baseline version
> of it) seems attractive.
Sounds like this could've been good logic for the use of HOS
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Yang Yu wrote:
> DNS is actually working correctly I think.
> 1) The outputs are from Dreamhost Ashburn, but I saw the same result
> over IPv6 at Dreamhost LAX. Different DNS servers.
>
over ipv6 there might not be enough distinction between locations ...
> 2)
On 2013-04-15, at 12:00, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> Seems to me that it's a crock because *it should be in the DNS*.
>
> I should be able to retrieve the AS (administrative split) record
> for .co.uk, and there should be one that says, "yup, there's an
> administrative split below me; nothing under
- Original Message -
> From: "."
> What is the problem that people is trying to solve here? is this the
> correct place to solve it?
Wow; really?
The problem is "Google isn't *quite* a monopoly, yet, and we'd like to be,
even though that's evil".
And the answer is "no, it's not".
In
- Original Message -
> From: "John Levine"
> The public suffix list contains points in the DNS where (roughly
> speaking) names below that point are under different management from
> each other and from that name. It's here: http://publicsuffix.org/
>
> The idea is that abc.foo.com and x
dnswl.org should look at publicsuffix.org to correct errors.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Matthias Leisi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:10 PM, John Levine wrote:
>
>
> > You don't have to tell me that it's a gross crock, but it seems to
> > be a useful one. What do people use it for?
apache's mod_security comes in pretty handy for reducing the
cpu load caused by these attacks; we've seen many sites we
host getting hammered on the wp-login.php page from these
bots.
Here's the rules that block the bad requests:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wCpp7U5uOw_krEkQrm9NXFf2LjpGvlZ
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:10 PM, John Levine wrote:
> You don't have to tell me that it's a gross crock, but it seems to
> be a useful one. What do people use it for? Here's what I know of:
>
At dnswl.org, we use a heuristic (and manual checks) to derive different
"levels" of management (ie,
The Internet already have a problem with "one of everything" where a single
provider is much more popular than the other ones. Amazon, Google, Reddit,
Wikipedia...The 2th cooperative encyclopedia editing website is much
less popular than Wikipedia.
This is not a good thing, is a bad thing sin
FYI, the "new" part of this news is that the current botnet is 10x larger
than the one you're thinking of.
Damian
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 5:39 AM, Steve wrote:
> This is pretty old news , this "super bot-net" of compromised Wordpress
> sites ( and others) has been attacking since September
>
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
