Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?

On Apr 9, 2013, at 8:56 pm, Mark Andrews wrote: […] >> There are multiple documents to read and you can find them all here. >> >> https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/proposed-raa-07mar13-en.htm >> >> If anyone has specific questions about the draft RAA, they should >> contact Samantha

Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?

In message <5648a8908ccb564ebf46e2bc904a75b15ff1684...@exvpmbx100-1.exc.icann.o rg>, Leo Vegoda writes: > > Eric Brunner-Williams wrote: > > [...] > > > Joe is an employee of the corporation, a rather high ranking one. As I > > mentioned in my response to Mark, he _may_ be in a position to > >

RE: NANOG Digest, Vol 63, Issue 45

Bryan, nope, it didn't make it through to my inbox . I try to contact you through other channels. Martin > Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 02:41:42 + > From: Bryan Williams > To: "nanog@nanog.org" > Subject: NANOG - csi reset request > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >

RE: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?

Eric Brunner-Williams wrote: [...] > Joe is an employee of the corporation, a rather high ranking one. As I > mentioned in my response to Mark, he _may_ be in a position to > encourage both legal to develop new language for future addition to > the RAA, and the Registrar Liaison to socialize the

Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?

On 4/9/13 5:47 PM, Jared Mauch wrote: > Can you point is at the right address or form to submit regarding this? Seems > like its time for both on and DS. Jared, Joe is an employee of the corporation, a rather high ranking one. As I mentioned in my response to Mark, he _may_ be in a positio

Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?

On 4/9/13 5:39 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: > I said all of this years ago as a suggestion for the next round of contract > renewals (since I was told that it had to be added to the contracts first). > > Best of luck. Personally, I think it should have been a requirement at least > 5 years ago. And exa

NANOG - csi reset request

Martin, I sent you this email from our corporate email, and haven't heard back. Did you receive this? Regards, Bryan Williams Sr. Solutions Architect Cloudmark, Inc From: Bryan Williams mailto:bwilli...@cloudmark.com>> Date: Tuesday, April 9, 2013 12:58 PM To: "m.ho...@hotze.com

Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?

Can you point is at the right address or form to submit regarding this? Seems like its time for both on and DS. Jared Mauch On Apr 9, 2013, at 7:48 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote: > On 4/9/13 4:23 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: >> It's about time certification was lost for failure to handle AA

Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?

I said all of this years ago as a suggestion for the next round of contract renewals (since I was told that it had to be added to the contracts first). Best of luck. Personally, I think it should have been a requirement at least 5 years ago. Owen On Apr 9, 2013, at 16:48 , Eric Brunner-Williams

Re: need help about free bandwidth graph program

There's also bandwidthd which can be added to the list. Nfsen is the front end for nfdump (much like SiLK) with graphs and it has plugins to graph port usage, etc. On Apr 9, 2013, at 4:51 AM, Deric Kwok wrote: > Hi all > > Do you know any opensource program bandwidthgraph by ipaddess? > > T

IANA AS Numbers registry update

The IANA AS Numbers registry has been updated to reflect the allocation of 1 block to LACNIC in 2013-04-08: 61440-62463 You can find the IANA AS Numbers registry at: http://www.iana.org/assignments/as-numbers/as-numbers.xml Regards, Selina Harrington IANA Request Specialist ICANN

Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?

On 4/9/13 4:23 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > It's about time certification was lost for failure to handle > records. The same should also apply for DS records. You can suggest this to the compliance team. It seems to me (registrar hat == "on") that in 2.5 years time, when Staff next conducts a r

Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?

Yo Mark! On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:23:34 +1000 Mark Andrews wrote: > > Not accepting is just about as bad as not accepting A records. > You wouldn't certify a registrar if they couldn't update A records. > It's about time certification was lost for failure to handle > records. The same

Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?

Not accepting is just about as bad as not accepting A records. You wouldn't certify a registrar if they couldn't update A records. It's about time certification was lost for failure to handle records. The same should also apply for DS records. In message <6d7961e1-f0fe-4674-8f8e-49cb52

Re: Open Resolver Dataset Update

In the last 2 weeks we have seen double the amount of ddos attacks, and way bigger then normal. All of them being amplification attacks. I think the media whoring done during the spamhaus debacle motivated more people to invest time building up there openresolver list, since really no one has discl

Re: Open Resolver Dataset Update

Tom, The main criteria is the RCODE=0 vs RCODE=5 refused. I exposed the Recursion Available bit this last week to cover more of the use cases, but many servers provide a very large referral to root. You are correct in that your system doesn't provide that so should be less "visible" as a resul

Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?

You have a choice of registrars. If you don't like the one you are using right now, choose a different one. There are lots to choose from. http://www.icann.org/registrar-reports/accredited-list.html Joe Sent from my Ono-Sendai Cyberspace 7 On 2013-04-10, at 2:42, Alejandro Acosta wrote: > H

Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?

Hi, At least I know the infrastructure is not ready to accept IPv6 for NS registration. I tried with NetSol and GoD. Which remind me... I'm still waiting on my NSx.BCP38.ORG from GoD? Grr... (hate when someone is right) - Alain Hebertahe

Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?

Hi Carlos, list, Today I entered to networksolutions.com and I remembered this thread. I had to administer a domain name and I sadly found they have done nothing in IPv6 during the last 12 month. Regards, ^Ao$ On 3/28/12, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote: > Hello all, > > I just received a head

Re: cloudmark?

> Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:31:08 -0400 > From: Chris Conn > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: cloudmark? > Message-ID: <5164262c.3070...@b2b2c.ca> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > On 2013-04-09 10:27, Chris Conn wrote: > > (...) > Your experience does not mirror

Hazmat at 400 N Tampa

WFLA TV reports that Tampa Fire is working a hazmat call at 400 N Tampa. http://www.wfla.com/story/21920646/hazmat-situation-in-downtown-tampa Park Tower is the carrier hotel for Tampa Bay; there are about 13 carriers in that building, at least 9 of which have major POPs and xconn there. Depen

Re: Closing the gap to improve the capacity of existing fiber optic networks

On 9 April 2013 15:09, Eugen Leitl wrote: ... > “Our approach is so flexible, network operators could adjust capacity to > respond to increased demand, for example from people following big sport > events like the Olympics," added Dr Schröder. > As a Internet user: We want more bandwidth every

Re: NANOG 58 - New Orleans - Call For Presentations is open!

Reminder- the RFP closed yesterday but we will continue to accept submissions through the end of the week. Regards, -Dave On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:47 AM, David Temkin wrote: > Just a reminder that the RFP is still open for NANOG 58! > > Regards, > -Dave > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Da

Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN

On 4/7/13 9:45 PM, "Huasong Zhou" wrote: >We got this modem and router all in one box from Comcast directly. And by >the way, home use routers don't assign 10.0.0.0 numbers. Sure they can. And I'm sure if you checked the WAN interface of the device it has a public IPv4 address. - Jason

Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN

On 4/8/13 9:23 PM, "Seth Mattinen" wrote: >On 4/8/13 5:55 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: >> >> On Apr 7, 2013, at 18:45 , Huasong Zhou wrote: >> >>> We got this modem and router all in one box from Comcast directly. And >>>by the way, home use routers don't assign 10.0.0.0 numbers. >>> >> >> Some do

Re: cloudmark?

On 2013-04-09 10:27, Chris Conn wrote: Hi, it seems that many large providers are using cloudmark services. As far as I can tell: their policy is unclear, they can hardly be reached, mails to support are bouncing (delayed, then bounce). yes, the mailserver from one of our customers was bloc

ipfix analyzers

Can someone point me to IPFIX analysers that do automatic learning of traffic patterns, raise events as suspected dos, and when operator marked as false positive, won't trigger that pattern anymore? This should be without configuring any explicit network ranges anywhere. So when I do get new custo

cloudmark?

Hi, it seems that many large providers are using cloudmark services. As far as I can tell: their policy is unclear, they can hardly be reached, mails to support are bouncing (delayed, then bounce). yes, the mailserver from one of our customers was blocked and this was OK and rightful, because

Closing the gap to improve the capacity of existing fiber optic networks

http://www.gizmag.com/cudos-fiber-optic-network-capacity/26969/ Closing the gap to improve the capacity of existing fiber optic networks By Darren Quick April 7, 2013 Researchers claim to have increased the data capacity of optical networks to the point that all of the world’s internet traffic

Re: Open Resolver Dataset Update

Jared, If you mean there can be a referral with RCODE=0 and Recursion Available = 0, you'll need a third column actually documenting if there is a referral. This server is listed in ORP: $ dig www.google.be @195.160.166.139 ; <<>> DiG 9.7.3 <<>> www.google.be @195.160.166.139 ;; global options:

Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN

Quoting: Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 09:31:22 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: nanog list Subject: Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN On Sun, 7 Apr 2013, Fabien Delmotte wrote: CGN is just a solution to save time, it is not a transition mechanism through IPv6 At the end (IPv6 at home) yo

Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN

On 9-4-2013 1:10, Jay Ashworth wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Huasong Zhou" > >> We got this modem and router all in one box from Comcast directly. And >> by the way, home use routers don't assign 10.0.0.0 numbers. > > I have seen consumer NAT routers assign addresses in all thr

Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN

Huasong Zhou writes: > We got this modem and router all in one box from Comcast directly. OK, so the NAT is taking place in the router you got from Comcast, not in Carrier Grade NAT in Comcast's network. A fine distinction but an important one. The external address of your router is (a) globa