Infoblox just started offering the IPAM portion of their software for free,
http://www.infoblox.com/en/resources/software-downloads/ip-address-management-freeware.html
We've been using the full-blown commercial appliances (IPAM, DHCP, and
DNS), not the freeware. I don't know exactly how it works
+1
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> > Off topic, this reminds me I would rather have ASPLAIN
> > again. We switched a couple of years ago on a particular
> > user request.
>
> listening to those pesky users, eh?
>
> > If there is no objection, I would love to switch back
> >
> Off topic, this reminds me I would rather have ASPLAIN
> again. We switched a couple of years ago on a particular
> user request.
listening to those pesky users, eh?
> If there is no objection, I would love to switch back
> ASAP. This would be on route-views, and on route-views3.
> Just askin
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "James Wininger"
>
>> Are there data centers out there that are "fiber only"? That is to say
>> that the cross connects are fiber only and no copper cross connects
>> are available?
>
> I have not persona
On 18/12/2012 22:24, John Kemp wrote:
> If there is no objection, I would love to switch back
> ASAP. This would be on route-views, and on route-views3.
> Just asking if others concur?
rfc5396. I'd say go for it.
Nick
On 12/16/12 2:48 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> Looking for 32-bit AS numbers, I get some strange results from routeviews:
>
> route-views>sh ip bgp regexp _23456_
> BGP table version is 2393809200, local router ID is 128.223.51.103
> Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > b
In message
,
Christopher Morrow writes:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 18, 2012, at 12:22 , Christopher Morrow
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >>>
> >>> In message
> >>> ,
> >>> Christopher Morrow
> >>> writes
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On Dec 18, 2012, at 12:22 , Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>>
>>> In message
>>> ,
>>> Christopher Morrow
>>> writes:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Darren Pilgrim
wr
On Dec 18, 2012, at 12:22 , Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>
>> In message
>> ,
>> Christopher Morrow
>> writes:
>>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
4890
>>>
>>> it might not be their (eftps.gov's) fault though
In message
,
Christopher Morrow writes:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >
> > In message
> > ,
> > Christopher Morrow
> > writes:
> >> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Darren Pilgrim
> >> wrote:
> >> > 4890
> >>
> >> it might not be their (eftps.gov's) fault thoug
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message
> ,
> Christopher Morrow
> writes:
>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
>> > 4890
>>
>> it might not be their (eftps.gov's) fault though... but sure.
>
> If you run a server you should be expecting PTB fo
In message
,
Christopher Morrow
writes:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> > 4890
>
> it might not be their (eftps.gov's) fault though... but sure.
If you run a server you should be expecting PTB for both IPv4 and
IPv6. If you have broken equipement in front of the
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Christopher J. Pilkington
wrote:
> I'm looking for a simple tool to verify PMTUD is usable along a
> particular path. Ideally this tool would be cross-platform, or run on
> Linux or Windows.
tracepath (Linux), mturoute (Windows)
--
Darius Jahandarie
I'm looking for a simple tool to verify PMTUD is usable along a
particular path. Ideally this tool would be cross-platform, or run on
Linux or Windows.
I've done some testing of my own by hand, but hoping a tool would help
the admin on the other side be able to test for themselves.
- Original Message -
> From: "James Wininger"
> Are there data centers out there that are "fiber only"? That is to say
> that the cross connects are fiber only and no copper cross connects
> are available?
I have not personally run across any DCs that do not permit copper Xcon,
but I am
Aside from the fact that it helps unrelated people aid you in diagnosing
the problem, there's another, more practical reason to do it:
When you do, problems you're having will sometimes "magically" disappear,
because someone who a) is in a position to fix it, but b) is not in a position
to *talk a
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> 4890
it might not be their (eftps.gov's) fault though... but sure.
On 2012-12-18 08:08, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
On 2012-12-18 07:52, Christopher Morrow wrote:
see, now we're getting information that FDC/IRS could actually use!
:) This looks like an MTU issue then?
I believe so.
so, a suggestion t
On Dec 17, 2012, at 11:30 PM, ITechGeek wrote:
> For anyone who is worried that the root server change might impact them,
> they can go to http://www.iana.org/domains/root/files and download the root
> zone file. It probably won't need to be updated again until the next round
> of gTLDs is approv
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> On 2012-12-18 07:52, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>>
>> see, now we're getting information that FDC/IRS could actually use!
>> :) This looks like an MTU issue then?
>
>
> I believe so.
so, a suggestion to eftps.gov/irs/fdc is to simply clamp
On 2012-12-18 07:52, Christopher Morrow wrote:
see, now we're getting information that FDC/IRS could actually use!
:) This looks like an MTU issue then?
I believe so.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> On 2012-12-18 07:36, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Christopher Morrow
>>
>>> it's probably also fair to point out that ... it seems to be working.
>>> ( and A)
>>
>>
>> so, what's broken?
>
>
> The en
It works for me (http)
Cannot ping, so maybe they filtered the whole ICMPv6 and you have a MTU
problem. But that is only a guessing.
as
On 18/12/2012 13:36, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:3
On 2012-12-18 07:36, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Christopher Morrow
it's probably also fair to point out that ... it seems to be working.
( and A)
so, what's broken?
The end-user machines I tested on are behind 6in4 tunnels (MTU 1480).
They open the TCP c
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
>> if only some us-gov folks read this mailing list...
>> maybe someone form NIST could aim the right question to the right
>> eftps.gov people?
>> you'd think helping the t
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> if only some us-gov folks read this mailing list...
> maybe someone form NIST could aim the right question to the right
> eftps.gov people?
> you'd think helping the taxman would be appreciated.
>
it's probably also fair to point out t
if only some us-gov folks read this mailing list...
maybe someone form NIST could aim the right question to the right
eftps.gov people?
you'd think helping the taxman would be appreciated.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Dennis Burgess
wrote:
> I tried to this a month ago, no luck :( i.e. nothi
I tried to this a month ago, no luck :( i.e. nothing back from them, just goes
into no answer e-mail space!
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second
Edition"
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support
Services
For anyone who is worried that the root server change might impact them,
they can go to http://www.iana.org/domains/root/files and download the root
zone file. It probably won't need to be updated again until the next round
of gTLDs is approved.
---
In any event, I'm pretty sure that I'd rather get hit with "tampering with
evidence" versus them retrieving data that may incriminate me. I believe
this may be a the "lesser of two evils" game.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kyle Creyts [mailto:kyle.cre...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, Decembe
The hostname www.eftps.gov has both A and records, but the site is
only reachable via IPv4. Worse, the IPv6 connectivity is broken in such
a way that Firefox and Internet Explorer do not fall back to IPv4.
Tracing is broken for both protocols. The 10-net addresss in the IPv4
path were cu
31 matches
Mail list logo
