> However, for network sanitation purposes, I'll admit some surprise
> that the DNSchanger blocks have been reused so quickly.
i conject
sets a precedent for quick grab and sell, well rent. those dnschanger
folk were bad guys, so no one should have sympathy for them. first they
came for ... [h
On Aug 15, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Approx 2 months later after taking legal advice, the NCC formed the view
> that the police and the prosecutor had no legal basis for making the
> request and they consequently unlocked the objects.
With the end result that someone gets some rea
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Mark Foster wrote:
> Yep. 'no servers could be reached' for at least one domain that's hosted
> with them that i've come across.
>
> Appears to have been the case for >6 hours as of about 30 minutes ago,
> but just retested, fault appears to have cleared.
I follo
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
>
> I was dealing with a case where there's a mismatch in nameserver of a
> domain (nameservers set at registrar) and NS record on the delegated
> servers. Now NS on delegated servers are good and I am trying to create
> list
ripe caved at the time. yes it was a yank court order propagated as a
dutch police order. in ljubljana, ncc staff said that they regretted
caving, had not really needed to do so, it was a mistake that they would
not repeat. present company excluded, we all make mistakes.
randy
On 15/08/2012 22:34, Randy Bush wrote:
> at the time, ripe caved to the court order. took some weeks before they
> woke up. now a lot of noise, lawyers, and whitewash.
whoa, wait up there, you cocky youngster. It wasn't a court order; it was
a police order consequent to a request for internatio
Gotcha
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> > Caved? How so?
>
> at the time, ripe caved to the court order. took some weeks before they
> woke up. now a lot of noise, lawyers, and whitewash.
>
> randy
>
Hi Frank
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> Here's another option: http://sga.ripe.net/hbgplay/
>
>
This one looks good though I linked visible ASNs in BGPlay then blicking
ones here (even "Show/Hide AS" button somehow fails for me).
Thanks anyways. Will look forward for
Hello everyone
I was dealing with a case where there's a mismatch in nameserver of a
domain (nameservers set at registrar) and NS record on the delegated
servers. Now NS on delegated servers are good and I am trying to create
list of domains using wrong nameservers at registrar.
Now as you woul
> Caved? How so?
at the time, ripe caved to the court order. took some weeks before they
woke up. now a lot of noise, lawyers, and whitewash.
randy
Caved? How so? It looks like RIPE is ignoring the court order to keep the
blocks locked. Unless i am misunderstanding it.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> > It also sounds like RIPE did a big screw you to the Dutch police for
> > trying to interfere.
>
> no, they caved.
>
Here's another option: http://sga.ripe.net/hbgplay/
-Original Message-
From: joel jaeggli [mailto:joe...@bogus.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 12:52 PM
To: Robert Glover
Cc: NANOG Mailing List
Subject: Re: BGP Play broken?
On 8/15/12 10:28 AM, Robert Glover wrote:
> On 08/15/2012 1
> It also sounds like RIPE did a big screw you to the Dutch police for
> trying to interfere.
no, they caved.
Yep. 'no servers could be reached' for at least one domain that's hosted
with them that i've come across.
Appears to have been the case for >6 hours as of about 30 minutes ago,
but just retested, fault appears to have cleared.
On 16/08/12 02:17, jeff jones wrote:
> Anyone seeing issues with AT&T
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:51:32 -0400, Randy Whitney said:
> Perhaps it should not have been re-allocated at all, rather than cause
> the unsuspecting allocatee trouble they would not have seen from
> clean(er) space.
"unsuspecting"??!?
You want a clean prefix, get some IPv6 space instead. Anybody
I have the download completed, but still cant get a key... same boat though,
took a long time to get that far.
-Original Message-
From: PC [mailto:paul4...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 12:17 PM
To: Mark Gauvin
Cc: NANOG (nanog@nanog.org)
Subject: Re: Bandwidth spikes due t
Considering I can't get the download links to work, nor the generate
product key button to process without an error code we may either be at
Microsoft limits, or not there yet.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Mark Gauvin wrote:
> Or R2 service pack 3
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 2012-08-15,
Or R2 service pack 3
Sent from my iPhone
On 2012-08-15, at 12:48 PM, "Matthew Petach" wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
>> Anyone seeing a significant increase of traffic with this?
>>
>
> Not yet. Maybe everybody's waiting until service pack 2 is released?
>
On 8/15/12 10:28 AM, Robert Glover wrote:
On 08/15/2012 10:16 AM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
Seems like BGP Play - http://bgplay.routeviews.org/ does not works anymore?
It is not accepting prefixes and gives error to check if prefix is
announced globally or not.
I sent an email to the contacts liste
On 8/15/12 10:24 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
In a message written on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 08:01:15AM -0700, joel jaeggli
wrote:
Remediation of whatever wrong with a given prefix is an active activity,
it's not likely to go away unless the prefix is advertised.
Actually, that's not true on two fron
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
> Anyone seeing a significant increase of traffic with this?
>
Not yet. Maybe everybody's waiting until service pack 2 is released?
Matt
Anyone seeing a significant increase of traffic with this?
On 08/15/2012 10:16 AM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
>
> Seems like BGP Play - http://bgplay.routeviews.org/ does not works anymore?
> It is not accepting prefixes and gives error to check if prefix is
> announced globally or not.
I sent an email to the contacts listed on the BGPlay feedback page back
o
In a message written on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 08:01:15AM -0700, joel jaeggli
wrote:
> Remediation of whatever wrong with a given prefix is an active activity,
> it's not likely to go away unless the prefix is advertised.
Actually, that's not true on two fronts.
From a business relationship front
Hello everyone
Seems like BGP Play - http://bgplay.routeviews.org/ does not works anymore?
It is not accepting prefixes and gives error to check if prefix is
announced globally or not.
Was wondering if someone knows some alternate graphical tool? Route-Views
server is good and fun to use via T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco IOS XR Software Route Processor Denial of Service Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20120530-iosxr
Revision 2.0
For Public Release 2012 August 15 16:00 UTC (GMT)
+-
Su
On 8/15/2012 11:36 AM, TJ wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
In a message written on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:46:52AM +0100, Stephen
Wilcox wrote:
https://www.ripe.net/internet-coordination/news/clarification-on-reallocated-ipv4-address-space-related-to-dutch-police-
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:46:52AM +0100, Stephen
> Wilcox wrote:
> >
> https://www.ripe.net/internet-coordination/news/clarification-on-reallocated-ipv4-address-space-related-to-dutch-police-order
>
> From the article:
>
On 8/15/12 6:55 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
While I understand that in the face of IPv4 exhaustion long quarantine
periods are probably no longer a good idea, I think 6 weeks is
shockingly short. I also think to blanket apply the quarantine is
a little short sighted, there are cases that need a long
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 09:43:02AM -0500, Grant Ridder wrote:
> I have ATT DSL at home and the DNS servers (68.94.156.1 and 68.94.157.1)
> pushed from ATT work fine.
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Justin Vocke wrote:
>
> > https://twitter.com/#!/search/AT%26T%20DNS
> >
> > ATT is having som
I have ATT DSL at home and the DNS servers (68.94.156.1 and 68.94.157.1)
pushed from ATT work fine.
-Grant
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Justin Vocke wrote:
> https://twitter.com/#!/search/AT%26T%20DNS
>
> ATT is having some DNS issues on their backbone. There is currently no ETA
> for resolu
https://twitter.com/#!/search/AT%26T%20DNS
ATT is having some DNS issues on their backbone. There is currently no ETA
for resolution.
--
Justin Vocke
On 8/15/12 9:20 AM, "Grant Ridder" wrote:
>What kind of circuit? residential? commercial? DNS server ip's?
>
>On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:1
What kind of circuit? residential? commercial? DNS server ip's?
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:17 AM, jeff jones wrote:
> Anyone seeing issues with AT&T and DNS resolution? Still troubleshooting,
> but wanted other input.
>
> Thanks
> ~Jeff
>
Anyone seeing issues with AT&T and DNS resolution? Still troubleshooting, but
wanted other input.
Thanks
~Jeff
In a message written on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:46:52AM +0100, Stephen Wilcox
wrote:
> https://www.ripe.net/internet-coordination/news/clarification-on-reallocated-ipv4-address-space-related-to-dutch-police-order
From the article:
] The address space was quarantined for six weeks before being re
>From the little blurb on the RIPE site, it sounds like the Dutch police are
making threats (taking over administration) that they can't legally keep.
It also sounds like RIPE did a big screw you to the Dutch police for
trying to interfere.
-Grant
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Stephen Wilcox
FYI RIPE reallocated these blocks. Whilst I understand they didn't want the
court order, this seems a bit silly, doesn't that now make the machines
residing in these blocks special - even if the owners arent miscreants, it
makes them a viable target.
https://www.ripe.net/internet-coordination/news
37 matches
Mail list logo
