On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> and sorry that our certs did not pay godzilla or gobble for the
> privilege of being in their bowsers. refund below [1]
there was no [1]...
startssl.com - free certs. (that work)
While there may be other grounds for telling them not to call you, the
do not call list is not one of them as it does not apply to business
to business solicitations.
"The national Do-Not-Call list protects home voice or personal
wireless phone numbers only. While you may be able to register a
bus
> Could someone make:
> 2) put the graphs at 'not rpki.net' on rpki.net (too)
no. that is the exact point. the graph to which i pointed is on rob's
site. these are data each relying party can collect and see for
themselves and their point of view in the universe, not some central
authority.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> germane to this discussion) from the rpki.net relying party software at,
> for example,
> http://www.hactrn.net/opaque/rcynic/index.html
>
> suggestions for improvement solicited, of course.
the text talks about rpki.net
the link is for 'not
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:
> I liked Cogent when we had them years ago but due to routing instability
> (off the charts) and unplanned down time every single month we dropped
> them. they call me every 3-6 months (different person each time) and I
> tell them to go aw
I liked Cogent when we had them years ago but due to routing instability
(off the charts) and unplanned down time every single month we dropped
them. they call me every 3-6 months (different person each time) and I
tell them to go away
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Tim Vollebregt
> but we're more focused on giving the *user* the tools to measure and
> see. so you may want to look at the tables and graphs (graphs more
> germane to this discussion) from the rpki.net relying party software at,
> for example,
>http://www.hactrn.net/opaque/rcynic/index.html
oh, and the doc
> As the global RPKI data set and system load grows, we want to ensure
> that the system is performing well. This is why we have added
> measurement functionality to the RIPE NCC RPKI Validator toolset:
> https://www.ripe.net/certification/rpki-validator-metrics
>
> When enabled, it will gather th
> Users that have a hard time with Asterisk do not understand it.
been running it since pre 1. have large complex configs with confs,
follow-me (my original need), extensions and sip/iax peering with
strange things all over the developing world.
i still think config sucks. and changing syntax r
Ameen Pishdadi wrote:
A Kia and Ferrari can both get me from point a to point b, but the Ferrari is capable of getting me there way quicker, and yes I'm going to pay a premium for it but if I'm going from NYC to San Fran I'd definitely feel safer in the Ferrari reliability wise and get there a hel
( I coudln't resist )
http://traceroute.sourceforge.net/
#define DEF_RADB_SERVER "whois.radb.net"
#define DEF_RADB_SERVICE"whois"
const char *get_as_path (const char *query) {
server = getenv ("RA_SERVER");
if (!server) server = DEF_RADB_SERVER;
service =
Hello everyone!
I have a funny case - one of our upstream provider announced our address
space for very short time which was well due to confusion since we
requested them to announce one of other blocks while they by mistake
announced both blocks.
Anyways, now funny thing here is - whenever I ru
Hello,
If there is an mxlogic.net admin available, please contact me off list
regarding an IP block. I have tried traditional channels and they are not
getting me anywhere.
Thanks,
Mario Eirea
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Simon Perreault
wrote:
> On 2012-05-15 19:01, Tom Hill wrote:
>>
>> On 15/05/12 18:00, Randy Bush wrote:
>>>
>>> i run a raw asterisk and would not wish it on my worst enemy.
>>
>>
>> I've been itching to try Freeswitch
>
>
> I know FreeSWITCH and Asterisk from the
On 2012-05-15 19:01, Tom Hill wrote:
On 15/05/12 18:00, Randy Bush wrote:
i run a raw asterisk and would not wish it on my worst enemy.
I've been itching to try Freeswitch
I know FreeSWITCH and Asterisk from the inside out because we ported
both of them to IPv6.
Verdict:
- Asterisk start
Hi Faisal,
I have tried the setup in my lab. I can get the cSTM1s UP and the
controllers E1 up. But when I try to configure the subinterface, the
protocol does not come online.
Below is the configuration in one of the sides. The other side has
similar configuration.
controller SONET 4/0/2
frami
Yes, u will have to connect the fibers in a cross manner..and setup one side to
generate the clock..
Faisal
On May 16, 2012, at 8:09 AM, Diogo Montagner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> sorry for this dumb question.
>
> Is it possible to connect two routers like below ?
>
> RouterA/cstm1 dark fiber
Hello,
sorry for this dumb question.
Is it possible to connect two routers like below ?
RouterA/cstm1 dark fiber cstm1/RouterB
The interfaces used in this case are channelized STM1 in both sides.
Between RouterA and RouterB I would like to create many low-speed
interfaces ranging from
On 16 May 2012, at 00:01, Tom Hill wrote:
> I've been itching to try Freeswitch ever since I read this:
> http://www.freeswitch.org/node/117
Using FreeSwitch to provide trunk services for nearly a year. Very happy with
it. Just does what it says on the tin.
Currently installing a CudaTel as our
19 matches
Mail list logo
